By John W. Whitehead “As more and more data flows from your body and brain to the smart machines via the biometric sensors, it will become easy for corporations and government agencies to know you, manipulate you, and make decisions on your behalf. Even more importantly, they could decipher the deep mechanisms of all bodies and brains, and thereby gain the power to engineer life. If we want to prevent a small elite from monopolising such godlike powers, and if we want to prevent humankind from splitting into biological castes, the key question is: who owns the data? Does the data about my DNA, my brain and my life belong to me, to the government, to a corporation, or to the human collective?”―Professor Yuval Noah Harari Uncle Sam wants you. Correction: Uncle Sam wants your DNA. Actually, if the government gets its hands on your DNA, they as good as have you in their clutches. Get ready, folks, because the government— helped along by Congress (which adopted legislation allowing police to collect and test DNA immediately following arrests), President Trump (who signed the Rapid DNA Act into law), the courts (which have ruled that police can routinely take DNA samples from people who are arrested but not yet convicted of a crime), and local police agencies (which are chomping at the bit to acquire this new crime-fighting gadget)—is embarking on a diabolical campaign to create a nation of suspects predicated on a massive national DNA database. As the New York Times reports: The science-fiction future, in which police can swiftly identify robbers and murderers from discarded soda cans and cigarette butts, has arrived. In 2017, President Trump signed into law the Rapid DNA Act, which, starting this year, will enable approved police booking stations in several states to connect their Rapid DNA machines to Codis, the national DNA database. Genetic fingerprinting is set to become as routine as the old-fashioned kind. Referred to as “magic boxes,” these Rapid DNA machines—portable, about the size of a desktop printer, highly unregulated, far from foolproof, and so fast that they can produce DNA profiles in less than two hours—allow police to go on fishing expeditions for any hint of possible misconduct using DNA samples. Journalist Heather Murphy explains: As police agencies build out their local DNA databases, they are collecting DNA not only from people who have been charged with major crimes but also, increasingly, from people who are merely deemed suspicious, permanently linking their genetic identities to criminal databases. Suspect Society, meet the American police state. Every dystopian sci-fi film we’ve ever seen is suddenly converging into this present moment in a dangerous trifecta between science, technology and a government that wants to be all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful. By tapping into your phone lines and cell phone communications, the government knows what you say. By uploading all of your emails, opening your mail, and reading your Facebook posts and text messages, the government knows what you write. By monitoring your movements with the use of license plate readers, surveillance cameras and other tracking devices, the government knows where you go. By churning through all of the detritus of your life--what you read, where you go, what you say—the government can predict what you will do. By mapping the synapses in your brain, scientists—and in turn, the government--will soon know what you remember. And by accessing your DNA, the government will soon know everything else about you that they don’t already know: your family chart, your ancestry, what you look like, your health history, your inclination to follow orders or chart your own course, etc. Of course, none of these technologies are foolproof. Nor are they immune from tampering, hacking or user bias. Nevertheless, they have become a convenient tool in the hands of government agents to render null and void the Constitution’s requirements of privacy and its prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures. Consequently, no longer are we “innocent until proven guilty” in the face of DNA evidence that places us at the scene of a crime, behavior sensing technology that interprets our body temperature and facial tics as suspicious, and government surveillance devices that cross-check our biometrics, license plates and DNA against a growing database of unsolved crimes and potential criminals. The government’s questionable acquisition and use of DNA to identify individuals and “solve” crimes has come under particular scrutiny in recent years. Until recently, the government was required to at least observe some basic restrictions on when, where and how it could access someone’s DNA. That has all been turned on its head by various U.S. Supreme Court rulings that pave the way for suspicionless searches and herald the loss of privacy on a cellular level. Certainly, it was difficult enough trying to protect our privacy in the wake of a 2013 Supreme Court ruling in Maryland v. King that likened DNA collection to photographing and fingerprinting suspects when they are booked, thereby allowing the government to take DNA samples from people merely “arrested” in connection with “serious” crimes. Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Maryland v. King is worth reading not only for the history lesson on the Fourth Amendment but for its clear-sighted rebuke of the police state’s tendency to justify every encroachment on our freedoms as necessary for security. As Scalia noted: Solving unsolved crimes is a noble objective, but it occupies a lower place in the American pantheon of noble objectives than the protection of our people from suspicionless law-enforcement searches… Make no mistake about it: As an entirely predictable consequence of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national DNA database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason. Today’s judgment will, to be sure, have the beneficial effect of solving more crimes; then again, so would the taking of DNA samples from anyone who flies on an airplane (surely the Transportation Security Administration needs to know the “identity” of the flying public), applies for a driver’s license, or attends a public school. Perhaps the construction of such a genetic panopticon is wise. But I doubt that the proud men who wrote the charter of our liberties would have been so eager to open their mouths for royal inspection. The Court’s decision to let stand the Maryland Court of Appeals’ ruling in Raynor v. Maryland, which essentially determined that individuals do not have a right to privacy when it comes to their DNA, made Americans even more vulnerable to the government accessing, analyzing and storing their DNA without their knowledge or permission. Although Glenn Raynor, a suspected rapist, willingly agreed to be questioned by police, he refused to provide them with a DNA sample. No problem. Police simply swabbed the chair in which Raynor had been sitting and took what he refused to voluntarily provide. Raynor’s DNA was a match, and the suspect became a convict. As the dissenting opinion in Raynor for the Maryland Court of Appeals rightly warned, a person desiring to keep her DNA profile private, must conduct her public affairs in a hermetically sealed hazmat suit…. The Majority’s holding means that a person can no longer vote, participate in a jury, or obtain a driver’s license, without opening up his genetic material for state collection and codification. Yet in refusing to hear the case, the U.S. Supreme Court gave its tacit approval for government agents to collect shed DNA, likening it to a person’s fingerprints or the color of their hair, eyes or skin. Whereas fingerprint technology created a watershed moment for police in their ability to “crack” a case, DNA technology is now being hailed by law enforcement agencies as the magic bullet in crime solving. It’s what police like to refer to a “modern fingerprint.” However, unlike a fingerprint, a DNA print reveals everything about “who we are, where we come from, and who we will be.” With such a powerful tool at their disposal, it was inevitable that the government’s collection of DNA would become a slippery slope toward government intrusion. All 50 states now maintain their own DNA databases, although the protocols for collection differ from state to state. Increasingly, many of the data from local databanks are being uploaded to CODIS (Combined DNA Index System), the FBI’s massive DNA database, which has become a de facto way to identify and track the American people from birth to death. Even hospitals have gotten in on the game by taking and storing newborn babies’ DNA, often without their parents’ knowledge or consent. It’s part of the government’s mandatory genetic screening of newborns. However, in many states, the DNA is stored indefinitely. What this means for those being born today is inclusion in a government database that contains intimate information about who they are, their ancestry, and what awaits them in the future, including their inclinations to be followers, leaders or troublemakers. For the rest of us, it’s just a matter of time before the government gets hold of our DNA, either through mandatory programs carried out in connection with law enforcement and corporate America, by warrantlessly accessing our familial DNA shared with genealogical services such as Ancestry and 23andMe, or through the collection of our “shed” or “touch” DNA. All of those fascinating, genealogical ancestral searches that allow you to trace your family tree can also be used against you and those you love. As law professor Elizabeth Joh explains, “When you upload your DNA, you’re potentially becoming a genetic informant on the rest of your family.” While much of the public debate, legislative efforts and legal challenges in recent years have focused on the protocols surrounding when police can legally collect a suspect’s DNA (with or without a search warrant and whether upon arrest or conviction), the question of how to handle “shed” or “touch” DNA has largely slipped through without much debate or opposition. Yet as scientist Leslie A. Pray notes: We all shed DNA, leaving traces of our identity practically everywhere we go. Forensic scientists use DNA left behind on cigarette butts, phones, handles, keyboards, cups, and numerous other objects, not to mention the genetic content found in drops of bodily fluid, like blood and semen. In fact, the garbage you leave for curbside pickup is a potential gold mine of this sort of material. All of this shed or so-called abandoned DNA is free for the taking by local police investigators hoping to crack unsolvable cases. Or, if the future scenario depicted at the beginning of this article is any indication, shed DNA is also free for inclusion in a secret universal DNA databank. What this means is that if you have the misfortune to leave your DNA traces anywhere a crime has been committed, you’ve already got a file somewhere in some state or federal database—albeit it may be a file without a name. As Forensic magazine reports, As officers have become more aware of touch DNA’s potential, they are using it more and more. Unfortunately, some [police] have not been selective enough when they process crime scenes. Instead, they have processed anything and everything at the scene, submitting 150 or more samples for analysis. Even old samples taken from crime scenes and “cold” cases are being unearthed and mined for their DNA profiles. Today, helped along by robotics and automation, DNA processing, analysis and reporting takes far less time and can bring forth all manner of information, right down to a person’s eye color and relatives. Incredibly, one company specializes in creating “mug shots” for police based on DNA samples from unknown “suspects” which are then compared to individuals with similar genetic profiles. If you haven’t yet connected the dots, let me point the way. Having already used surveillance technology to render the entire American populace potential suspects, DNA technology in the hands of government will complete our transition to a suspect society in which we are all merely waiting to be matched up with a crime. No longer can we consider ourselves innocent until proven guilty. Now we are all suspects in a DNA lineup until circumstances and science say otherwise. Of course, there will be those who point to DNA’s positive uses in criminal justice, such as in those instances where it is used to absolve someone on death row of a crime he didn’t commit, and there is no denying its beneficial purposes at times. However, as is the case with body camera footage and every other so-called technology that is hailed as a “check” on government abuses, in order for the average person—especially one convicted of a crime—to request and get access to DNA testing, they first have to embark on a costly, uphill legal battle through red tape and, even then, they are opposed at every turn by a government bureaucracy run by prosecutors, legislatures and law enforcement. What this amounts to is a scenario in which we have little to no defense of against charges of wrongdoing, especially when “convicted” by technology, and even less protection against the government sweeping up our DNA in much the same way it sweeps up our phone calls, emails and text messages. Yet if there are no limits to government officials being able to access your DNA and all that it says about you, then where do you draw the line? As technology makes it ever easier for the government to tap into our thoughts, our memories, our dreams, suddenly the landscape becomes that much more dystopian. With the entire governmental system shifting into a pre-crime mode aimed at detecting and pursuing those who “might” commit a crime before they have an inkling, let alone an opportunity, to do so, it’s not so far-fetched to imagine a scenario in which government agents (FBI, local police, etc.) target potential criminals based on their genetic disposition to be a “troublemaker” or their relationship to past dissenters. Equally disconcerting: if scientists can, using DNA, track salmon across hundreds of square miles of streams and rivers, how easy will it be for government agents to not only know everywhere we’ve been and how long we were at each place but collect our easily shed DNA and add it to the government’s already burgeoning database? As always there will be those voices—well-meaning, certainly—insisting that if you want to save the next girl from being raped, abducted or killed, then we need to give the government all the tools necessary to catch these criminals before they can commit their heinous crimes. If you care for someone, you’re particularly vulnerable to this line of reasoning. Of course we don’t want our wives butchered, our girlfriends raped, our daughters abducted and subjected to all manner of atrocities. But what about those cases in which the technology proved to be wrong, either through human error or tampering? It happens more often than we are told. For example, David Butler spent eight months in prison for a murder he didn’t commit after his DNA was allegedly found on the murder victim and surveillance camera footage placed him in the general area the murder took place. Conveniently, Butler’s DNA was on file after he had voluntarily submitted it during an investigation years earlier into a robbery at his mother’s home. The case seemed cut and dried to everyone but Butler who proclaimed his innocence. Except that the DNA evidence and surveillance footage was wrong: Butler was innocent. Moreover, despite the insistence by government agents that DNA is infallible, New York Times reporter Andrew Pollack makes a clear and convincing case that DNA evidence can, in fact, be fabricated. Israeli scientists “fabricated blood and saliva samples containing DNA from a person other than the donor of the blood and saliva,” stated Pollack. “They also showed that if they had access to a DNA profile in a database, they could construct a sample of DNA to match that profile without obtaining any tissue from that person.” The danger, warns scientist Dan Frumkin, is that crime scenes can be engineered with fabricated DNA. Now if you happen to be the kind of person who trusts the government implicitly and refuses to believe it would ever do anything illegal or immoral, then the prospect of government officials—police, especially—using fake DNA samples to influence the outcome of a case might seem outlandish. Yet as history shows—and as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People—the probability of our government acting in a way that is not only illegal but immoral becomes less a question of “if” and more a question of “when.” ABOUT JOHN W. WHITEHEAD Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His new book Battlefield America: The War on the American People (SelectBooks, 2015) is available online at www.amazon.com. Whitehead can be contacted at [email protected]. Publication Guidelines / Reprint Permission John W. Whitehead’s weekly commentaries are available for publication to newspapers and web publications at no charge. Please contact [email protected] to obtain reprint permission. Image credit: The Anti-Media Uncle Sam Wants Your DNA: The FBI's Diabolical Plan to Create a Nation of Suspects
#DNA #FBI #StopTechnocracy #Biometrics #PoliceState #CivilLiberties #U.S.Constitution #PrivacyRights #UncleSamWantsYourDNA
0 Comments
Why does President Trump continue to surround himself with Deep State Globalists, likely traitors and now here the Attorney General nominee, William Barr who has been shown to be friends with Robert Mueller, has a nefarious past and proven to be anti 2nd Amendment? Consider writing to your legislature and say no and give the reason why! Ed. William Barr’s ‘Deep State’ Resume: Cover-ups, Covert ops, and Pardons By Jefferson Morley AlterNet January 17, 2019 More “I started off in Washington at the Central Intelligence Agency and went to law school at night while I was working at CIA,” recalled William Barr in a 2001 oral history for the University of Virginia. Trump’s nominee to be attorney general has what Trump might call “deep state” credentials. Barr came to Langley in 1973. He was a 23-year-old graduate of Columbia with a master’s in political science and Chinese studies. His resume shows he toiled at the CIA by day and attended George Washington University law school at night. The Watergate scandal was ravaging the agency’s reputation and destroying the presidency of Richard Nixon. A close examination of Barr’s legal career indicates a high tolerance for presidentially sanctioned law-breaking. Barr spent four formative years in the Intelligence Directorate and the Office of Legislative Counsel. He even made the acquaintance of CIA director George H.W. Bush. In 1977 Barr moved on to a prestigious clerkship for a federal judge and then a series of jobs in private practice and the Justice Department. In 1991, Bush, now president, appointed Barr to be attorney general. At age 41, Barr was one of the youngest men ever to hold that office. He left after one year and went on to a long career in corporate law and public service. Barr now returns to his old job at the behest of besieged President Trump. Barr’s confirmation hearings open this week amid questions about the legality of the president’s conduct toward Russian state agents and FBI investigators. Will Barr protect the investigation of Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller? Or will he act on a tightly argued memo in which he claimed Mueller has already exceeded his authority? In his first turn as attorney general in 1991, Barr handled three legal issues of deep concern to the CIA. He helped resolve all three issues favorably for the agency’s leaders and the president. Barr’s decisions were unfavorable to law enforcement, Congress, and the voters. Bank of Fear The first deep state fiasco handled by Attorney General Barr was the mother of all scandals, known by the sibilant initials, BCCI. The Bank of Credit and Commerce International was a global institution, which deputy CIA director Robert Gates described, slightly more accurately, as “the Bank of Crooks and Criminals.” David Ignatius dubbed it “The Bank of Fear.” BCCI was a shadowy but very real institution with connections to governments and intelligence services all over the world. BCCI’s owners specialized in evading regulators so that they could speculate and bribe with the depositors’ money. As the fraud mounted and spread, law enforcement officials and bank regulators the world over discovered what the CIA had been trying to hide. Senate investigators, led by John Kerry, found the agency had numerous BCCI accounts. Kamal Adham, the former chief of Saudi intelligence and a CIA collaborator, played a leading role in the bank’s dealings. The final report of the Kerry Committee captures the mind-boggling scale of BCCI’s corruption. It was the kind of true story that makes people believe there is a “deep state.” In 1991, federal prosecutors in Tampa launched an investigation of money laundering at BCCI. The District Attorney of Manhattan investigated a broad array of bank activities and found itself getting zero cooperation from colleagues in the Justice Department and CIA. Barr sat on the influential deputies committee of the National Security Council, which controlled the paperwork. “We couldn’t get records. We couldn’t get witnesses. We could barely get a meeting,” said John Moscow, the lead BCCI prosecutor in Manhattan, in a recent interview. Barr was up for confirmation as attorney general. Moscow said he heard that Democrats on the Judiciary Committee made Barr promise to let the BCCI investigation go ahead. “We didn’t have a problem once Barr was in there,” Moscow said. “We got cooperation. We prosecuted seventeen people here in New York. Of course, the biggest guys got away.” Several of the BCCI ringleaders were indicted, but they got away. Barr did not press Pakistan for their extradition, nor did his successors in the Clinton administration. More: William Barr's Deep State Cover Up, covert ops, and pardons Kevin Shipp's commentary on William Barr William Barr’s Connection to Ruby Ridge, Defending FBI Snipers The Senate Judiciary Committee hearings for Attorney General nominee William Barr have focused heavily on Barr’s views on Special Counsel Robert Mueller. But nobody is asking about Barr’s legal crusade for blanket immunity for federal agents who killed American citizens. Barr received a routine questionnaire from the Judiciary Committee asking him to disclose his past work including pro bono activities “serving the disadvantaged.” The “disadvantaged” that Barr spent the most time helping was an FBI agent who slayed an Idaho mother holding her baby in 1992. Barr spent two weeks organizing former Attorneys General and others to support “an FBI sniper in defending against criminal charges in connection with the Ruby Ridge incident.” Barr also “assisted in framing legal arguments advanced… in the district court and the subsequent appeal to the Ninth Circuit,” he told the committee. That charitable work (for an FBI agent who already had a federally-paid law firm defending him) helped tamp down one of the biggest scandals during Barr’s time as Attorney General from 1991 to early 1993. Barr was responsible for both the U.S. Marshals Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, two federal agencies whose misconduct at Ruby Ridge “helped to weaken the bond of trust that must exist between ordinary Americans and our law enforcement agencies,” according to a 1995 Senate Judiciary Committee report. After Randy Weaver, an outspoken white separatist living on a mountaintop in northern Idaho, was entrapped by an undercover federal agent, U.S. marshals trespassed on Weaver’s land and killed his 14-year-old son, Sammy. The following day, FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi killed his wife, Vicki, as she was standing in the cabin doorway. Horiuchi had previously shot Randy Weaver in the back after he stepped out of the cabin. The suspects were never given a warning or a chance to surrender and had taken no action against FBI agents. Weaver survived. After an Idaho jury found Weaver not guilty on almost all charges, federal judge Edward Lodge slammed the Justice Department and FBI for concealing evidence and showing “a callous disregard for the rights of the defendants and the interests of justice.” A Justice Department internal investigation compiled a 542-page report detailing federal misconduct and coverups in the case and suggested criminal charges against FBI officials involved in Ruby Ridge. Barr told the New York Times in 1993 that he was not directly involved in the Ruby Ridge operation. Two years later, the Washington Post revealed that “top officials of the Bush Justice Department had at least 20 [phone] contacts concerning Ruby Ridge in the 24 hours before Vicki Weaver was shot,” including two calls involving Barr. In January 1995, FBI director Louis Freeh announced wrist slaps for the FBI officials involved, including his friend Larry Potts, who supervised the operation from headquarters and who approved the shoot-without-provocation orders that “contravened the constitution of the United States,” according to the Justice Department internal report. When Attorney General Janet Reno later nominated Potts for deputy director of the FBI, top newspapers and members of Congress protested but Barr told the New York Times that his friend Potts “was deliberate and careful, and I developed a great deal of confidence in his judgment… I can’t think of enough good things to say about him.” A few months later, the FBI suspended Potts after suspected perjury regarding Ruby Ridge. (Potts was not charged and retired two years later.) The Justice Department paid $3 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit from the Weaver family. But when Boundary County, Idaho filed criminal charges against Horiuchi, Barr sprang to action seeking immunity for FBI snipers. He spearheaded efforts to sway the court to dismiss all charges because holding a sniper liable would “severely undermine, if not cripple, the ability of future attorneys general to rely on such specialized units in moments of crisis such as hostage taking and terrorist acts.” When the Justice Department won an initial appeals court victory in the case in 2000, federal judge Alex Kozinski warned in a dissent of a new James Bond “007 standard for the use of deadly force” against American citizens. The same court reversed that decision the following year. Kozinski, writing for the majority, declared: “A group of FBI agents formulated rules of engagement that permitted their colleagues to hide in the bushes and gun down men who posed no immediate threat. Such wartime rules are patently unconstitutional for a police action.” Does William Barr still endorse “wartime rules” and a “007 standard” that absolve federal agents for questionable shootings of Americans? Does Barr consider “illegal government killings” to be an oxymoron? Best of all, can Barr explain to us his understanding of the phrase “government under the law”? James Bovard is the author of Lost Rights, Attention Deficit Democracy, and Public Policy Hooligan Barr is for Red Flag Laws! On January 15, 2019 during the nomination hearings: Attorney General nominee William Barr tells Dianne Feinstein Red Flag Gun Control Laws (ERPO laws authorizing the seizure of firearms) are the "single most important thing we can do in the gun control area" CSPAN Barr Nomination Hearings William Barr's Deep State Resume
#WilliamBarr #AttorneyGeneral #DeepState #RubyRidge #CIA #GeorgeHWBush #RobertMueller #RedFlagLaws So much for hoping that Trump would keep his oath to uphold and honor the U.S. constitution. It’s like a stab in the back. Yet, it’s not as if this type of crap has never happened before. Promises made, never kept. Just as with all Presidents especially since the JFK assassination they are no longer in much control to begin with. Either way, get past him and focus on what you need to do to protect your rights. There are two very dangerous regulations that not only undermine your 2nd Amendment rights but will ultimately transfer to the dismantling of the Bill of Rights altogether. The Bump Stock Ban is one and now the Red Flag regulation to be coined “Extreme Risk Protection Orders”. A good article written by Teresa Mull is posted below the commentary that accurately addresses the severe implications with this particular gun confiscating agenda. How is this happening so quickly with barely a whimper? In essence, ‘Trial by Jury’ of your peers is now gone. It’s now the Court of Public Opinion where the general population is easily manipulated into an opinion steered by the media, educational institutions indoctrinating with Common Core and leftist universities along with, sadly, many mainstream churches where all are in unison with the Marxist agenda. They then provide the talking points where their audiences will embrace without having the remotest clue if what was presented to them is based on truth or fiction. Critical thought and common sense are a figment of the past. Their emotional strings are tugged and the ever so insane frenzy begins. Little do they understand how easily manipulated they have become while at the same time they are monitored and measured on all media platforms where the planners can analyze, calculate and plan their next move based on the data they acquired. These evil planners know all of you better that you do. Thus, now comes in the Red Flag Laws. Anyone (and it doesn’t matter if they’re possibly also insane, and are at least fully indoctrinated and stupid) can turn another in based on subjective criteria where the rights without due process are stripped away and property is confiscated. Wow! How is easy is that? It starts with firearms. The planners know they can now initiate this diabolical agenda. Their analysis of the populace supports it. And it won’t stop with the total dismantling of the 2nd Amendment. The 1st Amendment will be history at the same time where the rabid censoring and dismantling is already occurring at break neck speed. Oh! And that buzzword ‘Extreme’! A recent circumstance here being called extreme simply due to opposition on the bump stock ban. This is an accessory typical for AR15’s that increase the rate of fire that any marksman would state is not much different than one skilled on rapid fire using a stock semi-auto having zero modifications. And it still requires trigger pull. Hardly close to a machine gun. Yet, coined an extremist here just the same for simply opposing the ban understanding the underlying agenda where it was easy to start with generally unknown accessory such as the bump stocks. The planners knew this and then proved that only a very few understand what a bump stock is. So, hold on folks as bans on other ‘minor’ modifications will soon follow. Then that will be followed with another ban for AR15’s and then a ban on all ALL semi-automatics altogether. Now that would be a very large percentage of current legal gun owners. All future bans will simply be done by the unconstitutional decree of the ATF. The redefined criteria for machine guns just made by the ATF will set the precedent. That’s the plan. Yet the indoctrinated considers those that oppose a bump stock ban to be extreme. Why extreme? The answer is simple. They were told to think that way. Heck, who needs to research and vet what the corrupt lying media is telling them? Sounds good to them especially when it tugs at their emotional strings. They believe a bump stock accessory is equivalent to a Thompson machine gun? Where did they get that from? Certainly, it came from a source that disseminates false information whether if it was deliberate or not, was not properly vetted for accuracy. Any poor soul who attempts combat in a war using a bump stock accessory against a REAL machine gun doesn’t have a bloody chance as they would get quickly mowed down. The 'extreme' here is the extreme willful ignorance. Sadly, these willfully ignorant individuals will now be able to call out on any person that they choose and claim they are a danger to society and their firearms must be confiscated. It will be simply an accusation not backed by fact or truth. An accusation all is what will be needed. Guilty until proven innocent. Due process need not apply. Confiscation without reparations. It goes on and on. Sadly, these willfully ignorant individuals do not see or understand the whole picture. It will not stop with the gun confiscation. That is simply the first step. Oh! How Hitler, Stalin and Mao would be so jealous if they could witness the schemes that the planners now use while supported by these useful idiots to effectively and systematically destroy this once free nation! For those who own firearms, yes, those law-abiding citizens who have gone through the required steps to own, properly train how to use such as by NRA certified instructors and have followed all the required criteria necessary in today’s Orwellian world where it now may be prudent to maintain silence on what you own or permits issued in order to protect yourself from those with a rabid desire to destroy your rights. That includes family members and friends. They are too indoctrinated to be changed and lack any common sense or appropriate facts to back their views. Yet, these individuals, these useful idiots, are the perfect vehicle the planners will use to implement a communist society. What is even scarier is that the percentage is rapidly growing with the general population of all age groups that now believe communism is a good idea. It is a very precarious time for America. BREAKING: White House Endorses Seizing Citizens’ Guns Published: Dec 20, 2018 By: Teresa Mull President Trump’s Commission on School Safety just released a report with recommendations for “how to address school safety and violence.” Seizing guns is among the commission’s suggestions. The report says: The Commission endorses Extreme Risk Protection Order laws, which give authorities a temporary way to keep those who threaten society from possessing or purchasing firearms. Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), also known as “Red Flag Gun Confiscation” laws, have taken effect in some states already. Gun owners across the country are having their guns seized by law enforcement, as Dudley Brown, president of the National Association for Gun Rights put it, “simply on the pretense of a ‘tip’ from someone you may not even know.” Fox News reported in July more than 450 Florida residents had been ordered to give up their guns under the new law. In Jacksonville, one gun owner has already had 23 guns seized, and ten ERPO cases are pending. In New Jersey earlier this year, “police invaded a veteran’s home on the basis of something a child overheard at school and attempted to confiscate his guns without a warrant. One county in Washington State just announced officers seized 466 guns in 2018 alone. Breitbart.com reports: The White House School Safety Commission’s report will be released this week, and it will include calls for such confiscatory laws. On December 18, 2018, Breitbart News quoted Education Secretary Betsy DeVos’s preview of the report, saying, “Our report endorses states adoption of extreme risk protection orders, which temporarily restrict access to firearms to individuals found to be a danger to themselves or others.” DeVos stressed that the White House wants the confiscatory orders structured in a way that is “cognizant of due process protections and respectful of Second Amendment liberties.” Four Scary Facts Gunpowder Magazine has repeatedly sounded the alarm on red flag laws, and reminds its readers of these four scary facts regarding ERPOs: Law-abiding gun owners are guilty until proven innocent under ERPOs. These bills open the floodgates for vindictive family members, friends, or John Q. Public to accuse you of almost anything as justification to take your firearms. They can take these accusations to court, even though you’ve never been charged with or convicted of a crime. At that point, you are on defense to try to convince the judge why you should be able to keep your guns and your Second Amendment rights ERPOs open up a Pandora’s Box of ways for cunning lawyers and conniving family members to exploit gun owners. Red flag ERPO bills have been written so broadly on two fronts that in some instances, people are given near-endless possibilities by which to use the legal system to persecute gun owners. The list of what violations you can be reported for is all over the place. If you made a comment to someone or seemed depressed, virtually raising any type of “mental health” red flag could end with you battling for your Second Amendment rights in court. The timeframe for confiscation can go on for months. ERPOs can last for weeks, months, or up to a year in cases where a gun owner would have to appear for repeated court hearings to try to win back his or her Constitutional rights. In some instances, the government would hold onto your guns for you; other bills have a neutral third party holding onto your guns. Both political parties are supporting ERPOs. Many would have you believe that Democrats are leading the charge for gun control in the wake of the horrific schools shootings of 2018. But nothing could be further from the truth. Republicans are leading efforts as well. Teresa Mull is editor of Gunpowder Magazine. Contact her at [email protected]. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Gunpowder Magazine. Source: www.gunpowdermagazine.com/breaking-white-house-endorses-seizing-citizens-guns/?fbclid=IwAR2ARFNLYE-NGd_Gacsrs6FawQ3BDKkdvVOZXIvo9Xer00whv5Gf5r4nVSY Additional Resources for Accuracy in Information: Gun Owners of America FPC/FPF Opposition to ATF's Proposed Ban on "Bump-Stock-Type" Devices (docket no. 2017R-22) BREAKING: Federal Lawsuit Filed Challenging Trump Bump-Stock Ban; Injunction Sought KrisAnne Hall JD Published on Nov 29, 2018 KrisAnne Hall is an attorney and former prosecutor, fired after teaching the Constitution to TEA Party groups – she would not sacrifice liberty for a paycheck. She is a disabled veteran of the US Army, a Russian linguist, a mother, a pastor’s wife and a patriot. She now travels the country and teaches the Constitution and the history that gave us our founding documents. KrisAnne Hall does not just teach the Constitution, she lays the foundations that show how reliable and relevant our founding documents are today. She presents the “genealogy” of the Constitution – the 700 year history and five foundational documents that are the very roots of American Liberty. - White House Endorses Seizing Citizen’s Guns
#ExtremeRiskProtectionOrders #ERPO #RedFlagGunConfiscation #RedFlagLaws #BumpStocks #BumpStockBan #ATF #BATF #2ndAmendment #1stAmendment #4thAmendment @RealDonaldTrump Brett Kavanaugh’s Chickens Come Home to RoostThat didn't take long. Anyone who took the time to do the diligent research that is required and NOT be swayed by the Mockingbird Media knew that there are serious red flags with Kavanaugh's character. Evidently very few did any critical research and then went on to believe the lying media to include Fox News and several other major conservative media outlets. It was the perfectly played out psyop. Both sides were played and fooled. The more disappointing element was how Conservatives were told to gush, love and support an individual whose past already proved to be in complete contraindication to their ideological views. Yet, they followed just like good sheeple should. On a previous post, Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed, Possibly Most Conservative Supreme Court Since 1934. Really?, it was suggested: " Time will tell on this new SCOTUS appointment. And it may be prudent not to hold any high hopes on him upholding the U.S. Constitution." Time did tell and it didn't take long. Two articles expressing similar points on how easy it is to deceive. The Kavanaugh Betrayal Exclusive: Joseph Farah flays man who pushed Sandra Day O'Connor, latest Trump pick Published: 12/10/2018 at 7:29 PM By: Joseph Farah I hate to say it, but I saw this one coming. When President Trump selected Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court, I knew it was at least a very risky pick. But he won the hearts of conservatives because of the insanity of the opposition. Now we know, for certain, that Brett Kavanaugh is a fraud. He should never have been President Trump’s first choice. He’s a weakling. He buckled to the extreme left to salvage his own reputation. I had a bad feeling about this guy – ever since his role in the Vincent Foster cover-up and his tutelage by former independent counsel Kenneth Starr. How many times do we have to see this kind of betrayal by Republican nominees of Supreme Court justices – Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, John Roberts? Let’s review the facts. In 1981, it was young Justice Department lawyer Kenneth Starr who authored “a hurriedly prepared, error-filled memo,” according to Robert Novak and Rowland Evans, that convinced President Reagan to go through with the nomination of Sandra Day O’Connor to the high court – despite tremendous opposition from those who believed she was unfit and unworthy of Reagan’s support. The memo gave O’Connor a clean bill of health on abortion by “using legal gymnastics to explain her Arizona legislative record,” wrote Evans and Novak. He wrote that she had “no recollection” of how she voted on a 1970 bill to legalize abortion when, in fact, she was a co-sponsor of the measure that was defeated 6-3 in committee. Starr misrepresented that O’Connor was something of a friend and associate of Arizona pro-life leader Dr. Carolyn Gerster. In fact, Gerster told Evans and Novak: “I had an adversary position with Sandra O’Connor” and called her “one of the most powerful pro-abortionists in the [Arizona] Senate.” So-called “conservatives” have continued to give Starr a pass on this monstrous disservice to Ronald Reagan and America. He just did it again to Donald Trump with Kavanaugh. Unbelievable! But true. More: www.wnd.com/2018/12/the-kavanaugh-betrayal/ Brett Kavanaugh’s Chickens Come Home to Roost Submitted by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton on December 10, 2018 By: Cliff Kincaid Citizen journalist David Risselada has written a book, Psychopolitics in America: A Nation Under Conquest, in which he explains how so many are being led astray by what passes for the “conservative media.” Consider the case of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who was sold by Fox News and other beltway groups as a conservative pro-lifer. After Kavanaugh’s Monday ruling in favor of Planned Parenthood, many grassroots conservatives are beginning to realize they were misled about his real record. One conservative website called it a “betrayal.” It wasn’t a surprise to us. My group, America’s Survival, Inc., was virtually alone in exposing Kavanaugh’s real record on abortion and other social issues. We published the 44-page report, “The Deep State Wears Black Robes,” and called his nomination a “Trojan Horse.” Yet, Fox News and other conservative media, as well as various Washington, D.C.-based conservative groups, had advertised Kavanaugh as a strong conservative. Many of them were invited to the White House to listen to Kavanaugh hail the legacy of “liberty” of the man he would replace, pro-abortion and pro-gay Justice Anthony Kennedy. That turned out to be an indication of Kavanaugh’s liberal direction on the court. We had conducted a careful study of Kavanaugh’s record, noting that he was a virtual clone of Justice Kennedy. A liberal Catholic, Kavanaugh actually had a record of ruling against evangelical chaplains. But one leading conservative told me I had gone off “the deep end” by opposing Kavanaugh. Fox News refused to cover our detailed critique of his record. It was a very controlled “debate” with “both sides” defined so as to exclude the real truth. But Fox News wasn’t alone in stacking the deck. All of the major conservative websites fell for the ruse that Kavanaugh was a conservative. They know who they are. They owe their readers an apology. Kavanaugh’s ruling against pro-lifers will protect taxpayer funding of the abortion industry. A liberal commentator was ecstatic: “Justice Kavanaugh just saved Planned Parenthood from red states attempting to defund the clinic network.” Another said Justices Kavanaugh and John Roberts “joined with the court’s progressives to preserve Planned Parenthood’s public funding.” Drawing upon the material at our website, America’s Survival, Inc., Risselada’s book quotes from one of our reports on Kavanaugh’s Deep State and Washington insider background. Of course, Soros-funded groups were organizing against Kavanaugh. But we saw the opposition as largely fake and designed to get liberal-left forces agitated about the future of the court. In short, it was an organizing tool that accelerated when the sex charges were launched against him. In truth, Kavanaugh was one of the best judges they could hope for from a Republican president. Our opinion was that they were going through the motions of opposition in a dialectical maneuver designed to force conservatives in line behind him. A much better nominee would have been Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a conservative woman with a clear pro-life record. But she didn’t have Kavanaugh’s Washington establishment connections. In light of Monday’s ruling, Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel said that he isn’t ready to throw in the towel on Kavanaugh just yet, expressing the hope that another abortion case could come before the court in 2019 and that Kavanaugh and Roberts could end up on the right side. But pro-life author Gregg Jackson, who opposed Kavanaugh, isn’t surprised by his ruling in favor of the abortion industry: “We all know President Trump and the Republicans promised to defund Planned Parenthood in the run-up to the 2016 election, to get the pro-life Evangelical and Catholic vote. Instead of defunding Planned Parenthood when they had the ability to do so with a Republican congressional majority, Republican president, and Republican-appointed majority Supreme Court, not only did they fully fund Planned Parenthood baby killers/body parts sellers, giving them over a billion dollars in the last 24 months but they also increased funding by 37 percent. Republican-appointed judges gave us the pro-abortion rulings Roe and Casey and have funded Planned Parenthood at a greater clip then Democrats have!” It’s fascinating to note that an old photograph has surfaced showing a young Brett Kavanaugh appearing with a young lawyer by the name of Rod Rosenstein. It turns out they were both on the staff of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, who went through the motions of investigating the Clintons without pursuing charges of murder in the Vincent Foster death case. Rosenstein, now the United States Deputy Attorney General, appointed Robert Mueller as the Russia-gate prosecutor. As we argued in “The Deep State Wears Black Robes,” if Mueller or another prosecutor subpoenas Trump, and Trump refuses to comply, the case could very likely appear before the Supreme Court, where Kavanaugh could emerge as the deciding vote. We noted that the progressives are already calling for Kavanaugh to recuse himself from anything related to the Russia investigation if it comes before the Supreme Court. But rather than recuse himself, Kavanaugh could actually rule in favor of Mueller and the Russia-gate probe. He could vote against Trump in order to counter the criticism that he believes presidents can’t be subpoenaed and are “above the law.” The chickens are coming home to roost. President Trump, who is in the midst of a White House staff shake-up, should root out those who betrayed him in the Kavanaugh matter. For their part, responsible conservatives who backed Kavanaugh and either were deceived or consciously deceived the American people concerned about human life issues have no option other than to propose impeachment of the court’s newest Justice. Source: www.trevorloudon.com/2018/12/brett-kavanaughs-chickens-come-home-to-roost/?fbclid=IwAR3IDVV9x8guUA0HRhErnSwNcsFYKyGFIswVkSZSbdWFbLtaCMGSEFZMEq0 Related Articles: Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed, Possibly Most Conservative Supreme court Since 1934. Really? 3 Constitutional Reasons Why Kavanaugh Should Not Be On The Supreme Court The Kavanaugh Betrayal, Brett Kavanaugh's Chickens Come Home to Roost
#BretKavanugh #JudgeKavanaugh #VincentFosterCoverUp #VincentFoster #PatriotAct #DeepState #Obamacare #4thAmendment #5thAmendment #SCOTUS #PlannedParenthood #Abortion #Betrayal Evil. Evil to the core. Yet George H W Bush's past will be whitewashed and history rewritten by the media and others to hide his most horrific acts. Is it possible that his crimes could even surpass the Clinton's? No tribute or eulogy here. The Bush Crime Family can now hopefully be dismantled now that he is gone.
Who Is George H. Scherff. Jr? How intriguing to consider that Bush Sr may have been born under another name. True identities of previous Presidents have come into recent scrutiny such as #44 where now it appears where #41 requires critical examination as well. Excerpts of the details are only highlighted where the sourced link is later posted. Based upon a preponderance of evidence, in addition to recent discoveries through independent research, indicating patterns of deceit, corruption, theft, conspiracy, murder and treason, it appears that George H. Scherf(f), Sr. (GHS1) was the real identity of Prescott Sheldon Bush (PSB). Even Skorzeny "bought" the story that George H. Scherf, Jr. (GHS2) was GHS1/PSBs adopted son. In effect, GHS1/PSB was a double agent who worked primarily on behalf of the Nazi SS apparatus that controlled the German Central banks who, in turn, controlled their counterparts on Wall Street and in London. [1] Otto Skorzeny - S.S./ODESSA/CIA master spy and assassin Friends and acquaintances of Nikola Tesla recall him complaining about Scherff's son, George, Jr., always snooping around Tesla's lab. On more than one occasion (probably during the late 1930s), Tesla caught the 14-year old Scherff looking at his notes, poring through his books, and stealing small items from his lab. Tesla gave him the nickname, "Curious George" and likened him to a "mischievous monkey." According to Skorzeny, (Adolph Hitler's former bodyguard) in a deathbed confession to Eric "Orion" (Eric Berman) in S. Miami, Florida, Tesla, "hated the younger Scherff." In fact, according to Skorzeny, the "Curious George" book and movie were inspired by Tesla' s suggestion. Curiously, the day before the national theatrical release of the Hollywood production of the Curious George feature length film, Alan Shalleck, the originator of Curious George (and the man in the Yellow hat), was found murdered under a pile of plastic garbage bags in his driveway in Florida at age 76. In short, Otto Skorzeny claimed that the true identity of George H.W. Bush was, "George H. Scherff, Jr., the son of Nikola Tesla's illegal-immigrant, German-born accountant, George H. Scherff, Sr." [1] Yet the timing does not make sense. The article points out the intriguing anomalies: So why did Scherff, Jr., lie to the FBI? Because it was dangerous for him to tell Hoover the truth about the real identities of his father and himself. Why would George H. Scherff, Sr. send his teen-age son to seek papers and other records (belonging to Tesla) from the FBI and not do it himself? Because the Director of the FBI, Herbert J. Hoover, would have recognized him as someone other than George H. Scherff, Sr. In fact, it is highly plausible that the individual who spoke to the FBI was not a Scherff and was a stand in. There also remains the most-likely possibility that the Scherff interview was nothing more than a ruse, created by the FBI for the purpose of obfuscating the facts around the government's involvement in the murder of Nikola Tesla, the theft of and covert infringement on his patents, and the money laundering that ensued between a few Wall Street banks and Adolph Hitler's Nazi Party. Anyone interviewing George H. Scherff, Jr., would have easily recognized that he was not old enough "to have worked for Nikola Tesla in 1914." Redacted statements in the above-referenced FOIA files indicate something was being covered up. The "Scherff" documents were created to thwart the research efforts of Leland J. Anderson, hide the facts behind Tesla's murder, and dispel any speculation that the FBI stole Tesla's records, research documents and new technologies. In 1942, less than a year prior to Tesla's untimely death, it was already known that principles at New York's Union Banking Corporation had been caught "Trading with the Enemy," Nazi Germany. Among the principals was George Herbert Walker, Prescott Sheldon Bush, "son" of industrialist Samuel Prescott Bush, who was president of Buckeye Steel Castings in Columbus, Ohio and the director of the Facilities Division of the War Industries Board. The WIB gave Samuel P. Bush unprecedented ties to the Eastern elite families through its association with one of the largest weapons manufacturers, Remington Arms. Buckeye Steel Castings supplied the railroad industry, controlled by the Rockefellers, the Harrimans, and J.P. Morgan with coupling parts and chassis for their tankers and railcars. Behind the scenes, Archbishop Francis Cardinal Spellman secretly influenced (or controlled) the activities of key intelligence agencies in the U.S., thus, affording the Vatican the opportunity to suppress potentially damaging information from reaching the public. Spellman and Hoover served the same "master," though it was not the U.S. government. Upon the revelations of the New York/Nazi money laundering and war profiteering, records in the National Archives, in particular those related to Samuel P. Bush, were destroyed "in order to ve space." Most likely, those records exposed multiple, covert relationships in a conspiracy of monumental proportions. [1] Look at the Bush and Walker families' lineage on this page and keep it in your mind as you read through and internalize this part of the story - the story of why America is ailing, how she became ill and who poisoned her. The relationships are (intentionally?) complex and difficult to decipher, so we have attempted to reduce them to workable symbols as if parts of equations. When we come out the other side of this article, we should have no question in our minds as to which "families" have been most influential in the preplanned destruction of America and her once-free people. [1] What Is the Real Story on GHW Bush's Service In The Military? It's too late to ask him. Yet it's likely he would have claimed not remembering just as he claimed to not remember where he was and what he was doing on the day of JFK's assassination. Whether it was Scherff or Bush for the true identities that is now in question, the evidence that the family originated in Germany is compelling. As with other family dynasties having the most evil intentions such as the Clinton's and the Rothschild's the lineage shows the same evil throughout the family tree along with deep Nazi connections. Open source information on the internet was not available during 41's reign as it is now. How many really knew any of this during his reign? Yet it is now becoming eerily apparent that Poppy/Rubbers Bush was deeply involved on the New World Order agenda in conspiring to take America down. Eugenics and Planned Parenthood Ties To JFK Assassination A thorough, documented, criminal indictment of George Herbert Walker Bush, establishing beyond a reasonable doubt his guilt as a supervisor in the conspiracy to assassinate John F. Kennedy. You must see it to believe that former president George Herbert Walker Bush was connected to the assassination of JFK. Once you see this documentary though there should be no doubt in your mind that it's true. The evidence is overwhelming and as the author of this documentary, John Hankey says, "If we could present this evidence to a jury in Texas, he would pay with his life". Did you know that Daddy Prescott Bush was Hitler's chief banker in the U.S. before 1942? Did you know that George H.W. Bush was in the CIA and in Dallas when Kennedy was killed? This video explores the many connections between George Bush and the Kennedy Assassination and makes a very convincing argument that he was the operational leader of the most important coup in American history. [3] Hunt's Deathbed Confession Reveals JFK Killers: "Consider the career of George H.W. Bush. He was a Texas oilman (Zapata Oil) and a CIA operative, involved with the Bay of Pigs. Bush's name was found in the papers of George DeMohrenschildt, one of Lee Harvey Oswald's CIA handlers. As documented by Pete Brewton, author of The Mafia, the CIA and George Bush, Bush was deeply connected with a small circle of Texas elites tied to the CIA and the Mafia, as well as the Florida-based CIA/anti-Casto Cuban exile/ Mafia milieu As Richard Nixon's hand-picked Republican National Committee chairman, and later as CIA director, Bush constantly covered-up and stonewalled for his boss about Watergate, which itself (by the admission of Frank Sturgis and others) was a cover-up of the JFK assassination." [5] The CIA Directorship GHSII/GHWB was CIA director from January 30, 1976 through January 20, 1977, or a total of 355 days. Not unlike his stint in Asia during the war in Vietnam, his presence in China probably involved drug smuggling and had little to do with diplomatic relations, outside of drug payoffs, assassinations and money laundering. His return to the U.S. was rewarded with a chairmanship at the First International Bank of Houston, a probable destination for illicit Asian profits. [1] Organized Child Sex Rings While In The White House George Bush Pedophile Sex Ring and Blackmail of Congress The Franklin Cover Up is only the tip of the Iceberg By Stew Webb, Veterans Today George HW Bush is a known evil pedophile, who ran a Congressional Blackmail Child Sex Ring during the 1980s known as “Operation Brownstone and Operation Brownstar”, and later to become known as “The Finders or The Franklin Coverup”. U.S. Vice President George HW Bush would sneak children over to Senator Barney Frank’s condo, known as a “Brownstone” to their famous cocktail parties, where U.S. Congressman and U.S. Senators — some willing and some unwilling participants — got a taste of the “Voodoo Drug” in their drink. To prove a case, you need one that was involved in an operation or a witness or documents; in this case, U.S. Customs documents prove the case without getting anyone still living killed. Inside the (scribd) document below is an article that appeared in US News and World report December 27 1993, entitled “Through a Glass Very Darkly”. This includes cops, spies and a very old investigation — also copies of the U.S. Customs Reports where the names are not blacked out. You may have purchased a set with the names blacked out from dirty FBI-CIA blackmailer Ted Gunderson, a known thief, liar and killer — a true “Daddy Bush FBI Troll, who surfaced in the 1990s to run cover for Bush and to identify those children who still may be living, who could be a liability to Bush, Gunderson and CIA George Pender’s Congressional Child Sex Blackmail Operation known as “Brownstar”. Ted Gunderson surfaced in the early 1990s as the so-called investigator in the Franklin Savings and Loan case against Larry King a Black Republican, who introduced George HW Bush at the 1988 Republican Convention as America’s next President. Ted Gunderson was there to get rid of any witnesses or children from “Boys Town”, an orphanage for all boys, many of whom had been transported to Washington DC and raped by these pedophiles in Bush-Gunderson-Pender Child Sex Ring known as “Operation Brownstar”. Alexander: Having watched many of Ted Gunderson's speeches online, in which he exposed child sex trafficking, I personally don't think he was involved in the coverup. I think (and I accept that I could be wrong) that it was simply impossible at the time for him to expose such a powerful organization. The true story never has been told that children from orphanages all across America during the 1980s came to Washington DC, paid by the US Taxpayers, to unknowingly participate in the Congressional Blackmail Child Sex Ring. Daddy Bush, Dick Cheney, John Sununu, according to sources, would be standing in line to greet the children and their caretakers as they came to the Vice President’s Home and or the White House for their specially invited tour at US Government expense. Bush, Cheney and Sununu would ask, “what’s your name”, and later just before dinner time, a call from the White House came into the hotel where the children were staying to the Caretakers inviting Little Billy, Mary, Johnny, Timmy, and Pam to the White House State dinner that evening. The caretakers thought it would be good for the children, since the White House could not accommodate the entire orphanage. Gunderson and Pender, who ran the operation, dispatched the limo at Bush’s request, and the female would take the children to the limo and immediately give them a Coke or Pepsi with the VOODOO DRUG in it, and they were off to U.S. Senator Barney Frank’s pad, known as a “Brownstone”. Of course, the U.S. Senators and U.S. Reps were there with the good-looking female prostitutes who would help get the congressmen and senators drunk on the “VOODOO DRUG”, so when Daddy Bush, Dick Cheney, John Sununu and others showed up at the party and the children in the limo arrived, the female prostitutes left and the child sex party started, with U.S. Vice President George HW Bush, Richard Cheney, John Sununu and others showing the VOODOO drunk congressman and senators how to have sex raping children, while the cameras were running. Someone pretending to be from the White House would call the caretakers back at the hotel and would tell them the children fell asleep and are staying the night here at the White House and will be returned before lunch tomorrow. The caretakers did not suspect a thing until 6 months later when their children were sitting in front of the TV watching the News and waiting for dinner, when many would jump up and point to the TV and say “He put his thing in me”, as the children pointed to either their rectum or the female side. These caretakers began to ask questions and did not know whom to call. Some called “People Magazine”, which spent a million dollars investigating all of America’s orphanages and found this was true, with those children selected out at the White House being greeted by these known pedophiles: Bush, Cheney and Sununu. The story was never told by “People Magazine”. The Journalist I talked to on many occasions in the late 1980s and early 1990s was never allowed to publish the story. [4] Papa NWO Bites The Dust The following video published December 1, 2018, American Intelligence Media adds additional critical information to include the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan where then how he essentially was in control over Reagan under Reagan's presidency. Notable Mentions [5] 1) Helping to orchestrate the “October Surprise,” in which the Iranian government was bribed or coerced into holding the American hostages until after the 1980 election, thereby helping to ensure Carter’s defeat and a Reagan/Bush victory. 2) The assassination attempt on Ronald Reagan two months after he took office. The Hinkley family, a Houston oil family, are long-time friends of the Bushes. 3) Presiding over the Savings and Loan/HUD scandal, in which taxpayers were made to pay over $500 billion for bailing out failed S&Ls. Son Neil Bush, director of Silverado Savings and Loan in Denver, is reported to have personally profited by about $1 billion. 4) As VP and therefore Head of the National Security Council’s Groups on Crisis Management, Drug Addiction, and Terrorism, Bush directed the Iran-Contra drug scandal, in which the secret government (comprised of ex-CIA and military intelligence operatives and businessmen) diverted profits from illegal arms sales to Iran to illegally fund the revolutionary Contras of Nicaragua and the Mujahadeen of Afghanistan. Under CIA protection, these covert operators flew vast quantities of cocaine and heroin into the poor neighborhoods of America, again using drug profits to fund the illegal covert war in Nicaragua, etc. 5) Under Bush’s watch, the CIA spent over $3 billion dollars fomenting holy war (“Jihad”) and training and funding the Mujahadeen terorists (including Osama bin Laden), their networks, and training camps in Afghanistan. Thus, the Taliban, the Mujahadeen, and Osama bin Laden were established as CIA assets and remain so to this day. Not coincidentally, under CIA supervision during the 80’s, Afghanistan became the number one heroin producer and exporter in the world. In 2000, the Taliban government banned the production of poppies (heroin). However, after the recent invasion of Iraq and installation of an American puppet government, Afghanistan is again the number heroin producer in the world. 6) Under Bush’s supervision of the first “War on Terrorism,” hundreds of thousands of Innocent civilians were killed, tortured and disappeared in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua. Another million or so each, again mostly civilians, were killed in the U.S.-supported and funded wars in Afghanistan and Iraq/Iran. 7) Presiding over invasions into both Panama and Iraq in which some 8000 Panamanians and over 200,000 Iraqis were killed. The U.S had illegally sold tens of billions of dollars worth of weapons, including chemical and biological weapons, to Saddam Hussein during the 80’s to help him build the strongest regional power in the Middle East. Evidence indicates that Saddam was more or less set up for the Gulf War when U.S. Ambassador Glaspie told him the U.S. had no interest in his border dispute with Kuwait. I.e., it was a trap. Good riddance Sources:
10 Reasons Why Not To Mourn George H W Bush
#GeorgeHWBushDead #GeorgeHWBush #Bush41 #BushCrimeFamily #ClintonCrimeFamily #CIA #JFK #JFKAssasination #Pedophilia #HumanTrafficking #ChildTrafficking #BayOfPigs #Rothschild SGT Report does an incredible expose' on the #campfires that will blow your mind. The first half of the commentary includes reports on critical insights in regards to voter fraud. There is an enemy. SGTreport Published on Nov 11, 2018 The second half of this important update may shock some of you to your core. The "camp fire" in California, like the Sebastopoll and Santa Rosa wildfires that came before it appears to have the hallmarks of something far more sinister than what is being reported by the mainstream media. Q is right, the enemy is at the front door and UN Agenda 21 is but one of his deadly weapons. SGTreport Intriguing insights in regards to voter fraud is discussed as well. Published November 14, 2018 SGTreport provides additional critical insight: SPACE WEATHER, ROTHSCHILD & AGENDA 21 “We do know that electric company PG&E experienced a problem with an electrical transmission line near the site of the fire, minutes before it broke out,” according to CBS News, and now criminal Governor has signed a bil allowing the company to CHARGE its customers whatever is necessary to pay for all of the lawsuits and losses that are coming. The punchline? PG&E is controlled by one of the world’s richest families, the Rothschild’s whose Agenda 21 goals seem to be coming along quite nicely with all of this “accidental” destruction." SGTreport Utility emailed woman about problems one day before fire MARTHA MENDOZA and GARANCE BURKE Nov 13th 2018 12:12PM PULGA, Calif. (AP) — A day before a deadly blaze destroyed a California town, the giant utility Pacific Gas & Electric Co. got in touch with Betsy Ann Cowley, saying they needed access to her property because their power lines were causing sparks. The cause of the fire that killed at least 42 people is still under investigation. What is known is that it started Thursday near Cowley's property in the tiny town of Pulga, incinerated the neighboring town of Paradise and killed dozens of people. On Monday, fire investigators declared the area surrounding power lines on Cowley's property, in an oak-filled canyon, a crime scene. Security guards would not let PG&E inspectors pass. Cowley said she was on vacation last Wednesday when she got a surprise email from PG&E. Details of that exchange, described to The Associated Press, combined with the utility's track record in California wildfire history has again brought the company under scrutiny. The email said that crews needed to come to her property to work on the high-power lines, Cowley said. PG&E told her "they were having problems with sparks," she said. They visited her property but she said she wasn't there Wednesday and was not aware of their findings. Cowley was back at the property Monday and expressed gratitude at finding most of the 65 structures on it still standing, just a few hundred feet from the crime scene where investigators worked to determine what had happened to spark the massive fire. The former landscaper bought Pulga, an abandoned and decrepit historic gold prospecting town, in 2015 and embarked on a project that transformed it into a picturesque private destination. She cleared overgrown brush, patched up buildings and added new ones. With Bay Area artists and architects, she recreated a town, complete with a stage and school house. And then, a year ago, she opened for business, renting out Pulga for corporate retreats. As she reached the site of her own home, she raised her hand to her cheek. "It's gone," she said. 'That's where all my stuff was, but it's not there anymore." She paused and picked up a mug that somehow had survived the inferno. "It's OK," Cowley told herself quietly. "It's OK." PG&E declined to discuss the email it sent Cowley with AP, saying it has provided an "initial electric incident report" with state regulators and will fully cooperate with any investigations. Publicly, PG&E has said it experienced a problem on an electrical transmission line near the site of the massive fire, minutes before the blaze broke out. In its Friday filing to the state Public Utilities Commission, it said it had detected an outage on an electrical transmission line near the site of the blaze. It said a subsequent aerial inspection detected damage to a transmission tower on the line. The area where CalFire says the blaze started, and where PG&E says sparks were detected on Cowley's property is roughly the same, according to an AP reporter at the site. The utility, which has been criticized and sued in a number of other large and deadly fires across California, had announced before the blaze started that it might shut down power in nine counties, including Butte County where Pulga and Paradise are, because of extreme fire danger. But it never did. Later Thursday, PG&E said it had decided against a power cut because weather conditions did not warrant one. State Sen. Jerry Hill, a Redwood City Democrat and longtime critic of the utility, called the report of troubles on PG&E's lines in the area extremely worrisome. "If PG&E is found responsible for burning down the state again, at some point we have to say enough is enough and we have to ask should this company be allowed to do business in California?" Hill said. "These fires take a spark, and at least in the last few years fires have been caused by negligent behavior by PG&E. We need to see how we can hold them responsible, or look at alternative way of doing business." California utility regulators are working with CalFire staff on their own, separate investigation into whether PG&E complied with state rules and regulations in areas that were torched in the fire. The California Public Utilities Commission will be evaluating PG&E's maintenance of their facilities, vegetation management and emergency preparedness and response, said commission spokeswoman Terrie Prosper. This is not the first time PG&E's management practices have come under question in the drought-stricken state. In 2014, regulators ordered the state's investor-owned utilities to set priorities for inspecting and removing dead and sick trees near their power lines, warning that "climate change has facilitated and exacerbated numerous wildfires" that have damaged and threatened their facilities. But after a wildfire killed two people, destroyed 475 homes and scorched 70,000 acres in the Sierra Nevada foothills the following year, homeowners and their attorneys questioned whether PG&E had done enough to clear dry trees flanking its power lines. In 2016, Cal Fire ultimately found PG&E was responsible for that fire, after tree maintenance by PG&E and its contractors led to a tree falling on a power line. Investigators have determined that PG&E equipment started several of the 2017 wildfires in Northern California wine country that killed 44 people. The company says it expects to pay more than $2.5 billion. _ Burke reported from San Francisco. Associated Press writer Jocelyn Gecker also contributed from San Francisco. www.aol.com/article/news/2018/11/13/utility-emailed-woman-about-problems-one-day-before-fire/23588480/?fbclid=IwAR22g9SWBqJT1V7LzOleKJiepjiDQ4fMXRjjaNT5_zg_8S7sQdgTlybwLFE California Fires: Enemy @ The Front Door
#CaliforniaWildFires #DEW #DirectedEnergyWeapons #WeatherWeapons #PG&E #Agenda21 #Agenda30 #VoterFraud #DEWMicrowaveTechnology #Laser #SpaceWeather #RothschildInc. #RothschilGlobalAdvisory #RothschildRestructuringOfAmerica #CampFire When one holds a Civil Service position such as a Senator of the United States, there are certain expectations held by most. In addition to the specific functions for each branch as outlined in the U.S. Constitution where an oath was taken to be held it is also required for additional attributes to be held where standards such as proper decorum, civility to all, along with respect, intelligence and integrity. It is evident that Senator Schumer lacks all. If he wishes to choose to act like an uneducated petulant child he should remove himself from office where then later he can spew all the crap he wants. This needs to stop and #SenSchumer needs to resign. Based on media information released primarily in other countries attempts against the French President were in play. The most recent occurrence was approximately four to five days prior to November 10. It is plausible to consider that cancellations had to made due to recent high risks. Until or when a confirmation for the 'correct', 'non-fake' reasons for this cancellation is reported it is best to look for more accurate sources and avoid like the plague what #SenSchumer thinks. Emmanuel Macron plot: Six people arrested over 'far-right' attempt to attack French president "Mr Macron was in Verdun, northeast France, for World War One commemorations when the latest arrests were made on Tuesday. He will host US president Donald Trump this weekend." www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/emmanuel-macron-attack-plot-six-arrested-far-right-france-isere-moselle-ille-et-vilaine-a8620101.html November 12, 2018 Update It does appear that weather played into the decision to cancel. However, the argument for cancelling due to security risk still stands. As Douglas M. Ducote Sr. clearly explains how POTUS does not have the power to decide mode of travel or where, or how in travel plans. The Secret Service does. If the distance is too long that is defined by specific criteria along with requiring the use of ONLY a specific mode of transport such as a helicopter and where the weather is too dangerous for helicopters to travel the trip WILL be cancelled. And POTUS had zero say in the matter. And Chuck Schumer certainly knows this as he has been around TOO long not to know. He lies. President Trump did NOT blow off these ceremonies. As he was already in Paris he attended a VA cemetery where, fortunately fell within the travel criteria that must be followed for adequate security. Other events were attended as well. Watch the full explanation that Douglas M. Ducote Sr. lays out on how travel security is coordinated. Go to his You Tube page and subscribe. When his videos get monetized he donates the proceeds to Veterans. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ecyPtHjU6o #SenSchumer 's Inexcusable Tweet
#SenSchumer #RealDonaldTrump #PresidentMacron #SenSchumerMustResign #WW1Commemoration "Joe Mahoney has covered state politics for many years. He knows the issues and he knows the players and he’s got perspective. This is what he’s been hearing in the last few days." NY2A Grassroots Coalition Marc Molinaro does have a shot at winning. He does not have a scandal ridden record as the corrupt King has. He does have a proven record of fiscal responsibility. Don't waste your vote on 3rd party candidates. Collectively they carry ONLY 7% with Larry Sharpe carrying only a meager 3%! And for any of you that are Anti-Trumpers, get this. Molinaro did NOT vote for Trump in 2016. Does that help? The reality is this. No matter what their platform is and although it sounds good for their audience the reality is they have a zero chance. And the chance is good that Cuomo can get fired. Get in the game, stay in the game post election to help influence critical issues. Engagement for only a few months every four years does not cut it. After all it should be 'Government By The People and For The People'. It first requires to get Cuomo fired! Don't Waste Your Vote! A Vote For Any Third Party Is A Vote For Cuomo! The November 1 2018 Sienna Poll shows Cuomo's lead narrowing! "Molinaro cut into the governor's lead as voters expressed the most unfavorable view of Cuomo in his eight years in office, the poll found. More voters now view Cuomo unfavorably (49 percent) than favorably (45 percent)." Poll: Andrew Cuomo holds shrinking lead in final days of NY governor's race An article written by George J. Marlin on October 4, 2018 reveals critical insight: "Andrew Cuomo is not very popular with rank-and-file Democrats and extreme leftists. He’s viewed as a pol who stands for nothing except holding onto power. Party regulars perceive him as a bully and a control freak. He treats them like dirt and they know he will throw them over the side if they get in his way or dare to disagree. Leftists consider Cuomo a political chameleon and they don’t trust him. They also believe his administration has been corrupt; that he is owned by oligarchs who finance his campaigns." Consider this other point that Marlin made: "And even if Molinaro falls short, if he and the minor party leftist candidates keep Cuomo’s total under 50 percent of the vote — that could kill Cuomo’s presidential aspirations. A candidate who can’t get a majority of the votes in his home state can’t be expected to get majority support from the nation at large. Think about it." source: Can Republican Marc Molinaro Defeat Governor Cuomo? Do New York and the other 49 states a huge favor! The 8 year nightmare that New York has been suffering from needs to end and can go no further. Vote as if your freedom, your children's and grandchildren's freedom from this tyrant depends on it! Not Voting Is A Vote For Cuomo And that is what happened 4 years ago. If all gun owners had gone to the polls to vote against Cuomo as the result of the passing of the the UnSAFE ACT he would not be Governor today. There were sufficient numbers of gun owners to have fired him had they voted. Where were they then? And there is zero argument, such as the questionable 2nd Amendment position of Molinaros' running mate that applies. If New Yorker's, especially all areas outside the New York City influence don't get vigilantly (that means ongoing, folks) engaged at the state and local level they have zero standing on what could be right or wrong with the candidates that run for office. Nor do any have standing when simply complaining on the anit-gun Bills that get passed by hook or crook along with with getting 'unnoticed' or otherwise. Stay and remain engaged. And don't allow any bad weather stop you as that would be much too much of a lame excuse. Get out and vote and help others to get to the polls. #VoteRed New York can be great again. It all depends on you. A Vote For A Third Party Candidate Is A Vote For Cuomo
#FireCuomo #VoteRed #MarcMentum #BelieveAgain #MarcMolinaro #LarrySharpe #GovernorCuomo #VoteMolinaro #2ndAmendment American Intelligence Media updates on how to recognize false flags such as the fake bomb threat and potentially the recent Tree Of Life Synagogue shooting. American Intelligence Media Published on Oct 28, 2018 The Globalists Are Losing
#Nationalists #Globalists #FakeBombs #TreeOfLife #SynagogueShooting #FalseFlag #SympathyForTheDevil The following guide is published by the New Yorker's Family Research Council focusing on the Governor and Senate races. Their comments remain Non-Partisan only suggesting to remain informed and to vote. Here? The only suggestion is to Vote Red. Cuomo Must be Fired! Gillibrand Must Be Fired! Vote! Your votes are critical! And yes, Vote Red! Another excellent guide is published by The New American providing the ability to drill down to every member of both Senate and House of Representatives for each state. An example would be New York District 20, Paul Tonko. His score is always abysmal as it shows here. Go directly to The Freedom Index to review how the score was determined by the following criteria: "The Freedom Index: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution" rates congressmen based on their adherence to constitutional principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, national sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements. The percentages below are cumulative scores based on key votes from 1999 to June 2018. Click on a senator's or representative's name to get a detailed breakdown of his or her voting record. https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38&Itemid=828&nameid=T000469 And don't forget to check Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's score where it's worse at 15%! See you at the Polls November 6th. New York State Mid-Term Election Guides on Governor, Senate and House Races
#GovernorAndrewCuomo #SenatorKirstenGillbrand #RepresentativePaulTonko #FireCuomo #FireGillibrand #FireTonko #VoteRed #WalkAway |
Archives
September 2020
Categories
All
|