Brett Kavanaugh’s Chickens Come Home to RoostThat didn't take long. Anyone who took the time to do the diligent research that is required and NOT be swayed by the Mockingbird Media knew that there are serious red flags with Kavanaugh's character. Evidently very few did any critical research and then went on to believe the lying media to include Fox News and several other major conservative media outlets. It was the perfectly played out psyop. Both sides were played and fooled. The more disappointing element was how Conservatives were told to gush, love and support an individual whose past already proved to be in complete contraindication to their ideological views. Yet, they followed just like good sheeple should. On a previous post, Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed, Possibly Most Conservative Supreme Court Since 1934. Really?, it was suggested: " Time will tell on this new SCOTUS appointment. And it may be prudent not to hold any high hopes on him upholding the U.S. Constitution." Time did tell and it didn't take long. Two articles expressing similar points on how easy it is to deceive. The Kavanaugh Betrayal Exclusive: Joseph Farah flays man who pushed Sandra Day O'Connor, latest Trump pick Published: 12/10/2018 at 7:29 PM By: Joseph Farah I hate to say it, but I saw this one coming. When President Trump selected Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court, I knew it was at least a very risky pick. But he won the hearts of conservatives because of the insanity of the opposition. Now we know, for certain, that Brett Kavanaugh is a fraud. He should never have been President Trump’s first choice. He’s a weakling. He buckled to the extreme left to salvage his own reputation. I had a bad feeling about this guy – ever since his role in the Vincent Foster cover-up and his tutelage by former independent counsel Kenneth Starr. How many times do we have to see this kind of betrayal by Republican nominees of Supreme Court justices – Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, John Roberts? Let’s review the facts. In 1981, it was young Justice Department lawyer Kenneth Starr who authored “a hurriedly prepared, error-filled memo,” according to Robert Novak and Rowland Evans, that convinced President Reagan to go through with the nomination of Sandra Day O’Connor to the high court – despite tremendous opposition from those who believed she was unfit and unworthy of Reagan’s support. The memo gave O’Connor a clean bill of health on abortion by “using legal gymnastics to explain her Arizona legislative record,” wrote Evans and Novak. He wrote that she had “no recollection” of how she voted on a 1970 bill to legalize abortion when, in fact, she was a co-sponsor of the measure that was defeated 6-3 in committee. Starr misrepresented that O’Connor was something of a friend and associate of Arizona pro-life leader Dr. Carolyn Gerster. In fact, Gerster told Evans and Novak: “I had an adversary position with Sandra O’Connor” and called her “one of the most powerful pro-abortionists in the [Arizona] Senate.” So-called “conservatives” have continued to give Starr a pass on this monstrous disservice to Ronald Reagan and America. He just did it again to Donald Trump with Kavanaugh. Unbelievable! But true. More: www.wnd.com/2018/12/the-kavanaugh-betrayal/ Brett Kavanaugh’s Chickens Come Home to Roost Submitted by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton on December 10, 2018 By: Cliff Kincaid Citizen journalist David Risselada has written a book, Psychopolitics in America: A Nation Under Conquest, in which he explains how so many are being led astray by what passes for the “conservative media.” Consider the case of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who was sold by Fox News and other beltway groups as a conservative pro-lifer. After Kavanaugh’s Monday ruling in favor of Planned Parenthood, many grassroots conservatives are beginning to realize they were misled about his real record. One conservative website called it a “betrayal.” It wasn’t a surprise to us. My group, America’s Survival, Inc., was virtually alone in exposing Kavanaugh’s real record on abortion and other social issues. We published the 44-page report, “The Deep State Wears Black Robes,” and called his nomination a “Trojan Horse.” Yet, Fox News and other conservative media, as well as various Washington, D.C.-based conservative groups, had advertised Kavanaugh as a strong conservative. Many of them were invited to the White House to listen to Kavanaugh hail the legacy of “liberty” of the man he would replace, pro-abortion and pro-gay Justice Anthony Kennedy. That turned out to be an indication of Kavanaugh’s liberal direction on the court. We had conducted a careful study of Kavanaugh’s record, noting that he was a virtual clone of Justice Kennedy. A liberal Catholic, Kavanaugh actually had a record of ruling against evangelical chaplains. But one leading conservative told me I had gone off “the deep end” by opposing Kavanaugh. Fox News refused to cover our detailed critique of his record. It was a very controlled “debate” with “both sides” defined so as to exclude the real truth. But Fox News wasn’t alone in stacking the deck. All of the major conservative websites fell for the ruse that Kavanaugh was a conservative. They know who they are. They owe their readers an apology. Kavanaugh’s ruling against pro-lifers will protect taxpayer funding of the abortion industry. A liberal commentator was ecstatic: “Justice Kavanaugh just saved Planned Parenthood from red states attempting to defund the clinic network.” Another said Justices Kavanaugh and John Roberts “joined with the court’s progressives to preserve Planned Parenthood’s public funding.” Drawing upon the material at our website, America’s Survival, Inc., Risselada’s book quotes from one of our reports on Kavanaugh’s Deep State and Washington insider background. Of course, Soros-funded groups were organizing against Kavanaugh. But we saw the opposition as largely fake and designed to get liberal-left forces agitated about the future of the court. In short, it was an organizing tool that accelerated when the sex charges were launched against him. In truth, Kavanaugh was one of the best judges they could hope for from a Republican president. Our opinion was that they were going through the motions of opposition in a dialectical maneuver designed to force conservatives in line behind him. A much better nominee would have been Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a conservative woman with a clear pro-life record. But she didn’t have Kavanaugh’s Washington establishment connections. In light of Monday’s ruling, Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel said that he isn’t ready to throw in the towel on Kavanaugh just yet, expressing the hope that another abortion case could come before the court in 2019 and that Kavanaugh and Roberts could end up on the right side. But pro-life author Gregg Jackson, who opposed Kavanaugh, isn’t surprised by his ruling in favor of the abortion industry: “We all know President Trump and the Republicans promised to defund Planned Parenthood in the run-up to the 2016 election, to get the pro-life Evangelical and Catholic vote. Instead of defunding Planned Parenthood when they had the ability to do so with a Republican congressional majority, Republican president, and Republican-appointed majority Supreme Court, not only did they fully fund Planned Parenthood baby killers/body parts sellers, giving them over a billion dollars in the last 24 months but they also increased funding by 37 percent. Republican-appointed judges gave us the pro-abortion rulings Roe and Casey and have funded Planned Parenthood at a greater clip then Democrats have!” It’s fascinating to note that an old photograph has surfaced showing a young Brett Kavanaugh appearing with a young lawyer by the name of Rod Rosenstein. It turns out they were both on the staff of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, who went through the motions of investigating the Clintons without pursuing charges of murder in the Vincent Foster death case. Rosenstein, now the United States Deputy Attorney General, appointed Robert Mueller as the Russia-gate prosecutor. As we argued in “The Deep State Wears Black Robes,” if Mueller or another prosecutor subpoenas Trump, and Trump refuses to comply, the case could very likely appear before the Supreme Court, where Kavanaugh could emerge as the deciding vote. We noted that the progressives are already calling for Kavanaugh to recuse himself from anything related to the Russia investigation if it comes before the Supreme Court. But rather than recuse himself, Kavanaugh could actually rule in favor of Mueller and the Russia-gate probe. He could vote against Trump in order to counter the criticism that he believes presidents can’t be subpoenaed and are “above the law.” The chickens are coming home to roost. President Trump, who is in the midst of a White House staff shake-up, should root out those who betrayed him in the Kavanaugh matter. For their part, responsible conservatives who backed Kavanaugh and either were deceived or consciously deceived the American people concerned about human life issues have no option other than to propose impeachment of the court’s newest Justice. Source: www.trevorloudon.com/2018/12/brett-kavanaughs-chickens-come-home-to-roost/?fbclid=IwAR3IDVV9x8guUA0HRhErnSwNcsFYKyGFIswVkSZSbdWFbLtaCMGSEFZMEq0 Related Articles: Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed, Possibly Most Conservative Supreme court Since 1934. Really? 3 Constitutional Reasons Why Kavanaugh Should Not Be On The Supreme Court The Kavanaugh Betrayal, Brett Kavanaugh's Chickens Come Home to Roost
#BretKavanugh #JudgeKavanaugh #VincentFosterCoverUp #VincentFoster #PatriotAct #DeepState #Obamacare #4thAmendment #5thAmendment #SCOTUS #PlannedParenthood #Abortion #Betrayal
0 Comments
Bret Kavanuagh could be the most conservative Supreme Court judge since 1934. That is according to Breitbart News purportedly to be a conservative media platform. There are plenty of issues questioning Kavanaugh's ideology and it makes one wonder what Ken Klukowski, the author of that article was thinking. Many may also wonder if the late Andrew Brietbart, founder of Breitbart News, is turning in his grave as his media platform seems to move further away from its original mission. Andrew Breitbart was the true #WalkAway individual in his time. To consider the new Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh as a conservative is questionable. As Benn Swan clearly points out his history suggests that he is not truly a Constitutionalist. As well conservatism was once associated with upholding the values that the Framers designed. Is that now gone? When given a critical historical account of Kavanuagh's history he appears to be far removed from the U.S. Constitution let alone being a Conservative. There are several arguments highlighting that Kavanuagh is more of a serious concern. What was Kavanaugh's Role as Prosecutor in the Office Of Independent Council with the cover up of the the murder of Vince Foster? By: USA Survival Published on Jul 4, 2018 Possible Trump Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh "is part of the ongoing cover-up of the murder of the [Clinton] White House deputy counsel" Vincent Foster. So charges researcher and journalist Hugh Turley. In this explosive video, learn how the Swamp operates in bipartisan fashion to cover up crimes, including murder, and how Deep State agents are deployed to intimidate witnesses and alter evidence. Turley worked with AIM's Reed Irvine and Cliff Kincaid on this case for years, only to face a cover-up from the liberal AND conservative media. KrisAnne Hall, a constitutional educator, speaker, author, attorney, and former prosecutor, provides an Op-Ed in The Western Journal with critical points on Kavanuagh: "In spite of the left’s phony hysteria, Justice Brett Kavanaugh was molded in the image of Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy and voted nearly in lockstep with Judge Merrick Garland, who was nominated to the Supreme Court by former President Barack Obama, in the District Court. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, gave a very detailed defense of why Kavanaugh was liberal enough for her to vote to confirm him, citing Kavanaugh’s judicial record:
A reasoned view of all the issues that have been highlighted by the political narrative proves that his opinions will very likely be no different than Kennedy’s. I therefore don’t see a tremendous change for the Supreme Court. Neil Gorsuch is the justice who probably moved the court more toward the Constitution, as he holds the Constitution as the ultimate standard, where Kavanaugh holds court precedent higher than the Constitution. Kavanaugh’s appointment does not so much move the court as it does stabilize the court as it has existed for many decades — or at least until Ginsberg retires and Trump nominates another justice. It is unfortunate that Kavanaugh’s confirmation was turned into a political tool for votes. We know this is the truth because his presence on the Supreme Court is absolutely no threat to any of the Democrats’ judicial idols. And both sides will now benefit in November from the unnecessary turmoil created by this political theater. After Justice Elena Kagan made a statement regarding the code of civility practiced by Supreme Court justices, the left has been asserting that Kavanaugh will somehow disrupt that tradition. Let’s be clear: The justices are not going to start brawling with one another. That’s just not how the court operates. They hear the arguments, ask their questions and issue their opinions. They are not constantly in the spotlight having to make speeches and triangulate public opinion like elected politicians, so I don’t see some kind of partisan infighting erupting in the Supreme Court. We know from the relationships of past justices that justices are capable of holding very disparate ideologies but behaving in a professional and civil manner. Kavanaugh’s behavior in the Senate hearings, where he was being personally attacked, cannot reasonably be considered a predictor of his behavior in a court hearing where a panel of judges are deciding the legal outcome of cases." KrisAnne Hall's analysis is on point, however, then attempts to give Kavanaugh a 'potential' benefit of doubt as the result of the circus waged against him where he may be inclined to opine more in line with the Constitution. His history suggests otherwise where he is more likely to align with the wrong side of the Constitution. There's no #WalkAway happening here. Just as with the Vince Foster cover up it's possible he was privy to the orchestrated circus that was planned well in advance. What else is there suggesting that Kavanugh is far from being conservative? Personal Liberty did a great write up revealing that Kavanugh is part of the Deep State: "Kavanaugh, while working as legal counsel in the White House of George Bush the lesser, also helped push the PATRIOT Act, which destroyed due process and 4th and 5th Amendments. Kavanaugh’s lawyer for his Senate Judiciary process is Beth Wilkinson, a longtime Democrat lawyer who represented several top aides to Hillary Clinton during the FBI investigation into Clinton’s homebrew server. She is married to David Gregory of CNN. Wilkinson was also on the prosecution team that convicted Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. That implicates her in the coverup of this false flag operation, protecting the FBI and then-U.S. Attorney Eric Holder, who provided the explosives for McVeigh and his partner, Terry Nichols. Personal Liberty's article finishes with this: "That there exists a nebulous group or groups actively working against the wishes of the American people is a difficult concept for a people as conditioned as Americans are to grasp. But anyone telling you there is no Deep State is either blind and ignorant or is lying to you." So true. Time will tell on this new SCOTUS appointment. And it may be prudent not to hold any high hopes on him upholding the U.S. Constitution. Sources: Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed, Possibly Most Conservative Supreme Court Since 1934 www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/10/06/kavanaugh-confirmed-possibly-most-conservative-supreme-court-since-1934/ Judge Brett Kavanaugh and the Murder of Vincent Foster https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3cDgq6tJsM KrisAnne Hall: What Justice Kavanaugh Means for the Future of the Supreme Court https://www.westernjournal.com/krisanne-hall-justice-kavanaugh-means-future-supreme-court/ Kavanaugh hearing confirms the existence of the Deep State https://personalliberty.com/kavanaugh-hearing-confirms-the-existence-of-the-deep-state/ Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed, Possibly Most Conservative Supreme Court Since 1934. Really? #BretKavanugh #JudgeKavanaugh #VincentFosterCoverUp #VincentFoster #PatriotAct #DeepState #Obamacare #4thAmendment #5thAmendment #SCOTUS #WalkAway |
Archives
September 2020
Categories
All
|