"Oklahoma House Bill 2872 is the most comprehensive bill I’ve seen to date dealing with the horrendous draconian totalitarian AMI Smart Meter implementation against supposedly free people’s rights and/or objections to causing them problems and/or damaged health!" [author, Catherine J Frompovich ] New York State for all levels of government take note. This legislation by Oklahoma so far is not only the best but better than the bill 7214 introduced to the NY Senate Energy Committee on January 3, 2018. Contact New York State Sen. Parker to voice support for the bill 7214 and suggest amendments [to include similar as below]. Call members of the New York Senate Energy and Telecommunications Committee to help get, what is still a critically important bill, out of committee. By Catherine J. Frompovich January 25, 2017 You know it just had to happen! Some scientifically-hip legislator in one of the 50 United States finally decided to introduce a bill to protect his constituents’ Constitutional rights guaranteed by both state and federal Constitutions, plus delineated the factual, independent--not consensus—science that radiofrequencies (RFs) from AMI Smart Meters damage health and “The OCC [Oklahoma Corporation Commission] is to understand by this legislation that they work for the consumers and citizens of the State of Oklahoma and not the utility”! [1] Applause, applause, applause and many kudos to Oklahoma State House of Representatives legislator Dale Derby for introducing House Bill 2872 that would provide many legislative means of relief for utility consumers who reject AMI Smart Meters, including removal at no cost to consumers, plus many more exemplary legislative provisions sorely needed by those individuals who are compromised by and suffer with electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) or idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI). Oklahoma House Bill 2872 is the most comprehensive bill I’ve seen to date dealing with the horrendous draconian totalitarian AMI Smart Meter implementation against supposedly free people’s rights and/or objections to causing them problems and/or damaged health! The Oklahoma bill is 12 pages in length, which I encourage everyone to study and also to ask your respective states’ Capitol legislators to introduce to provide the sorely-needed relief that has not been forthcoming from either harassing utility companies or lax and/or lackey state utility commissions. The bill’s language is nothing short of all encompassing, I think, considering the totality of issues involved. It cites independent studies confirming health harms from AMI Smart Meter radiation; defines what an electromechanical analog meter and wireless meters are, i.e., “AMR, ERT, smart, AMI and Comprehensive Advanced Metering Plan (CAMP)”; plus discusses and delineates “equivalent technology, cell phone, WiFi, Ratepayer, Opt-in, and Opt-out.” Oklahoma HB 2872 provides for the following: 1 – A choice of the type of utility meters to be installed and operated on their places of residence, property or business; among the choices offered shall be the installation or ongoing operation of a nontransmitting electromechanical analog meter; 2 – The ability to retain and operate an electromechanic alanalog [sic] meter on an ongoing basis at no cost; and 3 – The right to replacement of a wireless meter with a nontransmitting electromechanical meter at no cost. C. The utility companies in Oklahoma shall be required to obtain the ratepayer’s written consent, i.e. opt-in or opt-out: 1 – Before installing wireless meters or equivalent technology on the ratepayer’s property; and 2 – Before altering the functionality of said meters. D. The utility companies shall provide written notice to ratepayers within ninety (90) days of the effective date of this act for the purpose of informing said ratepayers if wireless meters have been installed on their properties. [….] E. Utility companies by this section of law shall be: 1 – Prohibited from shutting off service to a ratepayer based on the ratepayer’s utility usage or on the ratepayer having electromechanical analog meters; 2 – Prohibited from imposing any disincentive on a ratepayer for not consenting to the installation or use of wireless meters; 3 – Required to notify ratepayers in writing that the installation and use of wireless meters are not mandated by state or federal law and are not permitted without the ratepayer’s consent; Additionally, the bill provides that the OCC
How about these provisions! The OCC shall exercise its constitutional duty to independently review the safety of devices, such as smart meters, …. 5 – The OCC shall also promulgate rules that shall make Oklahoma permanently an opt-in state for any kind of smart meter application. And here’s the pièce de résistance, which refers to an “Electric Usage Data Protection Act” to be developed by the OCC to … remove the capability of the utility to have access to any information from the consumer except for what is necessary, in calculating gross consumption of the utilities services, to bill for the amount of the utility used by the consumer. The revised language is to make it clear that the consumer, not the utility, owns consumer information and any information that is unnecessary for billing may be released only for good and valuable consideration received by the consumer from the utility through a written agreement. Additionally, the utility may not sell the information, whether it identifies the consumer or not, nor may it aggregate the information to sell it, unless each individual consumer owner has given permission in writing to the utility. [CJF emphasis] There is something ‘missing’ from this exemplary bill, in my opinion. There is no mention of--nor does it address—the connection(s) between the fast-approaching and dramatically health-dangerous 5G broadband, which will require small cell towers placed every 300 feet that probably will have definite tie ins to AMI Smart Meters, the “key feedback loop” for the Internet of Things (IoT) reporting system for personal in-home data sharing, the concerns about which were discussed and neutralized in HB 2872. More.... https://www.activistpost.com/2018/01/oklahomas-exemplary-ami-smart-meters-removal-consumer-protection-bill-model-states-follow.html?winst=1517333615545&of=0
0 Comments
Town Supervisor, Chris Koetzle delivered the State of the Address January 17, 2018. Its entirety is available via You Tube and really worth the time for particularily Glenville residents to watch. Have the Town Board and the Town Supervisor’s initiatives for the past eight years taken Glenville in the right direction be it fiscally and commercially along with adding benefits such as park improvements? Yes. And thank you Supervisor Koetzle for taking Glenville out of the near crap hole the town was precariously heading into prior. However, not all is perfect and it is critical to take all of the Town Board to task when necessary. Really, no surprise that the Town of Glenville Comprehensive Plan updated October 2017 was so easily passed. This plan is, of course, all about improvements be it long or short term. The plan does contain some very sensible, well thought out and well planned goals along with some practical objectives. However, it does have those 'lovely' platitudes. And it is riddled with well hidden Agenda 21/2030 driven goals (who advised those planners when drafting where one can only wonder). If anyone is not familiar with the Agenda 21/2030 scheme it is imperative to get familiarized and educated NOW! There are several resources to bring all up to speed. An excellent place to start is Technocracy News & Trends. There have been minimal attempts to educate the board by residents several years ago where sadly all simply ignored the warnings. In summary this scheme will undermine every right you ‘think’ you have and take full control over every aspect of your life. The scheme includes ‘feel good’ ideas, plans and platitudes to get you hooked into thinking all are great. It is NOT. It is a global scheme affecting all countries such as the USA where is filters down to state then to local levels such as town governments for the most efficient implementation. Once one truly understands this scheme they will also understand how diabolical it really is. Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) and Public-Private Partnerships such as the NY Smart Grid are working alongside towns to direct what will get accomplished and its timing. Get educated on this! Agenda 21/2030 was necessary for a brief review as the theme for Smart Growth is directly associated. Automatic Read Water Meters (AMR) is part of the Smart Growth agenda. Once all infrastructure is fully in place that would include the necessary software and devices to capture the constant emitting of RF signals your privacy rights under the 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution will be completely stripped as these signals will document 24/7 of water used by all residents with these AMR devices. Why would anyone consider this type of surveillance even remotely necessary? The answer is To Control You. Does the Town Board understand this? Who knows? What is obvious is that the song and dance about cutting costs only applies to the Town on this matter. At 21:00 minutes in the You Tube link that is provided Koetzle discusses about the significant investments that ‘help us’ cut costs. Who is “us”? When on page 100 of the Town’s New Comprehensive Plan updated October 2017 where it includes that the billing structure for the water bills will change how does that equate in helping the residents? Just wait. 2018 will still be one bill. However, here comes those capital investments that Koetzle discusses where, mark, my words, it will be changed to a higher billing frequency of more than once per year and that cost will go up. Somebody is paying for all of that. Who might that be? At the 20:07 minute mark in the You Tube link provided Koetzle discusses about the cleanup of environmental hazards that have been completed providing specifics and expresses his concerns about matters “that threaten the health of our residents”. Good to hear that. However, if that is the case why is the Town attempting to force AMR Water Meters into the Glenville residents’ homes when it’s now established radio frequencies harm health? Look up Agenda 21/2030 for the answer. They think it’s only about efficiency or possibly they know the hidden agendas and otherwise spew that it’s about efficiency in running the Town and are also very likely advised (by NGOs and others) how to tell the residents otherwise. Along with the health destructive causes from Electric Utility Smart Meters, Cell Phones, Wi-Fi and Cell Towers to name the more obvious, AMR Water Meters are an additional health hazard on every resident. Along with the invasion of privacy that is compromised awareness is growing in efforts to protect each and every individual’s privacy. And the industries involved are withholding what is already known. Two points to be made to verify and prove these concerns are as follows:
Exposure to Radio Frequencies is now recognized as causing harm. Go to the ICD’s website: http://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/V00-Y99/W85-W99/W90-/W90.0XXA
All of these technologies are spying devices and violates your constitutional rights. To have the option to opt out without penalties to threats is paramount. The text of this bill can reviewed here: https://legiscan.com/NY/bill/S07214/2017 At 28:14 minutes Koetzle then discusses the plan for amending zoning and codes “in accordance with the Town Comprehensive Plan". And it will be hard work of ‘synching our code with the plan’. As AMR Water Meters are frequently referenced in the plan does this mean that a code ‘mandating’ the installation of an AMR Water Meter having radio frequency technology now known to cause medical harm will be one of them? If so, isn’t that ‘willful harm’ and as all board members are sworn in oath to the Constitution. Therefore, wouldn’t that now be consider as treason? How about the violation of the 4th Amendment rights? Thus a message going to the Town Supervisor, Commissioner of Public Works and the Town Board where ‘thank you’ for what has been truly positive. However, is the position for Smart Growth going to remove the rights of the citizens along with without any redress as the result in order to move full speed ahead on this agenda? And that is exactly what Agenda 21/2030 does to affected citizens. The Town of Glenville has enjoyed excellent improvements. However, it does not appear that the plans installing technology violating rights of the residents are of any concern to any or all of those involved. Here’s hoping that changes. There is a simple solution. An opt-out of an AMR Water Meter without any penalty or fee is all that is needed. January 17, 2018 – Town Board Meeting, Town of Glenville https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu7qKugJXvg www.technocracy.news/index.php/2017/11/06/rise-water-data-means-control-water-land/ The ICD Adds a New Diagnostic Code for Exposure to Radio Frequencies (RF) as Legitimate Health Condition On October 1, 2017, the International Classification of Diseases added a new Diagnostic Code for Exposure to Radio Frequencies (RF) as a legitimate and billable Health Condition. Previously, there was a diagnostic code for non-ionizing radiation only. The Medical system is now recognizing that exposure to Radio Frequency emissions is an actual cause of health issues that can be diagnosed and billed to insurance companies. Previously, there was a code for non-ionizing radiation but this new one is specific! The new CPT Code specifically is for RF Emissions, the exact type that Electronic Smart Meters, AMR Water Meters, Wi-Fi, Cell Phones and the list goes on emits. Most medical practitioners will not yet be aware of this. Take a copy of this code with you on your doctor’s visit. Most, or more likely, where all utilities, Federal, state and local governments will do everything they can to willfully ignore this. And that translates to cause of ‘willful harm’. This new diagnostic code provides vetting for you confirming that all radio frequencies causes harm. And that is powerful having this information for doctor’s visits and more. Awareness is growing in realizing how seriously all RF's affects the health to humans, animals, insects and plants. However, it is not quick enough. Share this information and educate. The RF, EMF and microwave exposure is getting worse at breakneck speeds and it must be stopped. 2018 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code W90.0XXA
Exposure to radio frequency, initial encounter 2016 2017 2018 Billable/Specific Code
A bill introduced on January 3rd by New York Sen. Kevin Parker would allow customers to opt out of installing Smart meter’ technology. Without question this is a critical bill to move forward and get passed. What this bill does not appear to list are the Smart Water Meters although the criteria designating this technology stated under this bill would qualify for inclusion. As of now the bill list meters related to electric or gas corporations. Smart Water Meters do need to get included. Writing and calling Senator Parker, contact Senator Parker’s Office, and all member of the energy committee to support and suggest the addition of smart water meters to the bill. Requesting one’s representative to co-sponsor would strengthen the chance to get out committee. As of this posting the list of members of the Energy Committees may or may not correctly reflect (updated) the 2018 members. Links for the both the NY Senate or Assembly: New York Senate Energy and Telecommunications Committee and the Assembly Standing Committee on Energy. Having the ability to get removed or prevent the installation of any smart meter is essential. As more understand the connection of so many confirmed health impacts that these devices create and the invasive technology compromising privacy is understood the demand by New Yorkers will only explode. It would be great if it were nipped in the bud now! By Mike Maharrey Tenth Amendment Center January 5, 2018 ALBANY, N.Y. (Jan. 5, 2018) – A bill introduced in the New York Senate would allow customers to opt out of installing “smart meter” technology on their homes and businesses. Passage of this bill would allow New Yorkers to protect their own privacy, and it would take a step toward blocking a federal program in effect. Sen. Kevin Parker (D-Brooklyn) introduced Senate Bill 7214 (S7214) on Jan. 3. The legislation would allow New Yorkers to opt out of any utility company smart meter program with no penalty. Smart meters monitor home energy usage in minute detail in real time. The devices transmit data to the utility company where it gets stored in databases. Anybody with access to the data can download it for analysts. Without specific criteria limiting access to the data, these devices create significant privacy issues. Smart meters can also be used to remotely limit power usage during peak hours. S7214 provides a comprehensive smart meter opt-out right for utility customers. It shall be the right of every customer of an electric and/or gas corporation, at no penalty, fee or service charge to decline the permission of his or her electric and/or gas corporation, (a) to replace an existing meter at such customer’s premises that is assigned to such customer’s account with a two-way smart meter or (b) to install any two-way smart meter device at his or her property without such customer’s consent. The legislation would also require utility companies to give customers 90-day notice before installing smart meter technology with a right to decline installation. It would further allow a customer to require removal of a smart meter with no charge for one year after installation. S7214 is a companion bill to A3066 currently pending in the New York Assembly. Privacy Concerns The proliferation of smart meters creates significant privacy concerns. The data collected can tell anybody who holds it a great deal about what goes on inside a home. It can reveal when residents are at home, asleep or on vacation. It can also pinpoint “unusual” energy use, and could someday serve to help enforce “energy usage” regulations. The ACLU summarized the privacy issues surrounding smart meters in a recent report. “The temptation to use the information that will be collected from customers for something other than managing electrical loads will be strong – as it has been for cell phone tracking data and GPS information. Police may want to know your general comings and goings or whether you’re growing marijuana in your basement under grow lights. Advertisers will want the information to sell you a new washing machine to replace the energy hog you got as a wedding present 20 years ago. Information flowing in a smart grid will become more and more ‘granular’ as the system develops.” The privacy issues aren’t merely theoretical. According to information obtained by the California ACLU, utility companies in the state have disclosed information gathered by smart meters on thousands of customers. San Diego Gas and Electric alone disclosed data on more than 4,000 customers. The vast majority of disclosures were in response to subpoenas by government agencies “often in drug enforcement cases or efforts to find specific individuals,” according to SFGate. “Mark Toney, executive director of the Utility Reform Network watchdog group, said the sheer number of data disclosures made by SDG&E raised the possibility that government agencies wanted to sift through large amounts of data looking for patterns, rather than conducting targeted investigations.” No Smart Meter, No Data Refusing to allow a smart meter on your property is the only sure-fire way to ensure your energy use data won’t fall into the hands of government agents or private marketers, or end up stored in some kind of government database. Passage of S7214 would make opting out a legal option for New Yorkers and give them control over their own privacy. Impact on Federal Program The federal government serves as a major source of funding for smart meters. A 2009 program through the U.S. Department of Energy distributed $4.5 billion for smart grid technology. The initial projects were expected to fund the installation of 1.8 million smart meters over three years. The federal government lacks any constitutional authority to fund smart grid technology. The easiest way to nullify such programs is to simply not participate. A3066 would make that possible. If enough states pass similar legislation, and enough people opt out, the program will go nowhere. We’ve seen a similar opt-out movement undermining Common Core in New York. Opting out follows a strategy James Madison advised in Federalist #46. “Refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union” provides a powerful means to fight back against government overreach. Such actions in multiple states would likely be effective in bringing down federal smart meter programs. UP NEXT S7214 was referred to the Senate Energy and Telecommunications Committee where it will need to pass by a majority vote before moving forward in the legislative process. Source: http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2018/01/new-york-bill-would-allow-customers-to-opt-out-of-smart-meters-undermine-federal-program-3/ STATE OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________________________________ 7214 IN SENATE January 3, 2018 ___________ Introduced by Sen. PARKER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Energy and Telecommuni- cations AN ACT to amend the public service law, in relation to advanced metering infrastructure devices for residential services The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. The public service law is amended by adding a new section 2 67-b to read as follows: 3 § 67-b. Advanced metering infrastructure devices for electric and gas 4 services. 1. The commission shall not allow for the installation of any 5 advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) device by an electric and/or gas 6 corporation unless such device meets or exceeds the following standards 7 for AMI performance and safety, which shall include: 8 (a) Federal Communications Commission standards for intentional and 9 unintentional radio frequency emissions and any other relevant standards 10 related to radio frequency exposure; 11 (b) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) specifications for 12 meter accuracy and performance; and 13 (c) any other standards, requirements and guidelines established by 14 the commission to protect customer health and safety and ensure, to the 15 fullest extent possible, the protection and encryption of customer 16 personal, financial and energy usage information. The commission shall 17 promulgate regulations necessary to effectuate this subdivision. 18 2. For purposes of this section advanced metering infrastructure shall 19 include: 20 (a) a one-way smart meter, which shall mean a device designed to 21 utilize one-way communications systems, including but not limited to: 22 (i) power line carrier; (ii) radio frequency; (iii) wireless fidelity 23 network; (iv) telephony; and (v) the internet to transmit customer usage 24 data to an electric and/or gas corporation for the purposes of billing; 25 and be designed to be capable of measuring and storing customer electric 26 and/or gas usage data, including time of use in real time; or EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD08581-01-7 S. 7214 2 1 (b) two-way smart meter, which shall mean a device that is designed to 2 utilize two-way communications systems, including but not limited to: 3 (i) radio frequency; (ii) wireless fidelity network; or (iii) the inter- 4 net to transmit electric usage and pricing data between an electric 5 and/or gas corporation and its customers, where such device is capable 6 of (A) measuring usage data and transmitting such data in intervals of 7 at least once per day; (B) receiving in real-time, per-kilowatt hour 8 (kWh) and/or per (therm) gas and electric supply and delivery rates; (C) 9 detecting customer service disruptions and transmitting such information 10 to an electric and/or gas corporation; and (D) storing customer usage 11 data. 12 3. It shall be the right of every customer of an electric and/or gas 13 corporation, at no penalty, fee or service charge to decline the permis- 14 sion of his or her electric and/or gas corporation, (a) to replace an 15 existing meter at such customer's premises that is assigned to such 16 customer's account with a two-way smart meter or (b) to install any 17 two-way smart meter device at his or her property without such custom- 18 er's consent. 19 4. An electric and/or gas corporation may not install a two-way smart 20 meter on a customer's premises that is assigned to such customer's 21 account unless it shall provide written notice to the customer no less 22 than ninety days prior to the scheduled installation of such meter. Such 23 notice shall provide that: 24 (a) the customer shall have the right to decline his or her electric 25 and/or gas corporation from installing a two-way smart meter with no 26 fee, penalty or service charge; 27 (b) the customer may, at any point during a period of three hundred 28 sixty-five days following the installation of a two-way smart meter, 29 require the removal of such device with no fee, penalty or service 30 charge; 31 (c) the customer may be liable for a fee to be determined by the 32 commission for the removal of a two-way smart meter device if the 33 customer requests the removal more than three hundred sixty-five days 34 following the installation of such meter at his or her premises. 35 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately. https://legiscan.com/NY/bill/S07214/2017
The truth regarding smart water meter misinformation A response to Ramona Municipal Water District's smart meter misinformation allegations
By Susan Brinchman, Patch Poster | Dec 27, 2017 11:25 pm ET | Updated Dec 27, 2017 11:55 pm ET Ramona Municipal Water District (RMWD) is currently installing smart water meters throughout its district, starting with San Diego Country Estates. RMWD has graciously agreed to provide free opt-outs for those customers who don't want a smart meter, according to its metering supervisor. Upon visiting RMWD's website (www.rmwd.org), a new article appears, entitled "Smart Meter Infrastructure." It alleges that the community is being misinformed about the new smart water meters, without naming sources. Smart water meter misinformation is alive and well. Unfortunately, the misinformation appears to be emanating from within, using industry-generated assertions designed to promote smart meters and calm the public down about smart meter realities many scientists and experts warn about. Literally, hundreds of thousands of utility - including water - customers have experienced unpleasant results from smart meter implementation, nationwide, in the past decade that they've been used in North America. These well-documented concerns, described at more length in the Patch article, Ramona's new smart water meters not a smart choice , involve:
Another critic of the CCST report found on the RMWD website was Dr. Karl Moret, MD, with a BS in Electrical Engineering, a Master of Engineering degree in Biomedical Engineering, and a four year post-doctoral fellowship in physiology. Dr. Moret had an interest for years in the health effects of electro-magnetic fields and energy medicine, lecturing on these topics widely. Dr. Moret's concerns about the CCST report included the following, and he called for a halt to smart meter installations as a result:
RMWD does not address the potential for conflict with other wireless devices using the same frequencies, such as garage door openers and baby monitors, described in Ramona's new smart water meters not a smart choice. In conclusion, I agree that smart water meter information can be misleading. But it is the promotional materials generated by a profit-making industry that is the source. I encourage Ramona Municipal Water District customers to strongly consider opting out of smart water meters and keeping an analog meter, by calling (and writing to document the request) the water district. As the nonprofit director of Center for Electrosmog Prevention closely involved in successfully obtaining a reduced cost gas and electric smart meter opt-out for customers of PG&E, Southern CA Edison, Southern CA Gas, and SDG&E (2011-2014), and who successfully prevailed upon Helix Water District, a utility providing water to 200,000 customers in East County, to drop their smart water meter program (2011), and now, working with RMWD to provide a free opt-out and to reconsider their smart water meter plans, I tell you that we can all make a difference. "It takes a village", as they say ... I appreciate the water RMWD has brought to such a wide area with a long history of water needs, as well as its expanded responsibilities for vital fire and emergency services. I suggest that the infrastructure and water services become more affordable - not less affordable - and truly safe for the community, and with a willing and informed spirit. I applaud RMWD for offering the free opt-out. That is a great beginning. Susan Brinchman, Director, Center for Electrosmog Prevention www.electrosmogprevention.org Ramona, CA Source: https://patch.com/california/ramona/truth-regarding-smart-water-meter-misinformation By - Lori Alton, staff writer for Natural Health 365 Originally published: June 9, 2017 (NaturalHealth365) Over 65 million American homes have currently been outfitted with ‘smart meters.’ Meanwhile, natural health experts and consumer rights advocates continue to speak out against the threat of this wireless technology – which exposes us all to highly-toxic frequency vibrations. In fact, research has shown that repeated exposure to excessive amounts of radiation can trigger migraines, neurological conditions and cancer. Now, new video evidence testifies to the damage that smart meters may be doing to our hearts. The results are visible – and undeniable The video (below) shows Warren Woodward, a specialist in smart meter microwave transmission power, connected to an EKG monitor while lying near an Elster smart meter. The Elster is connected to a high frequency analyzer, which measures microwave frequencies. As the HFA alternates between readings of 00.1 and 00.2, the EKG laptop monitor display – which shows the electrical activity of Woodward’s heart – indicates a regular, symmetrical pattern. When the meter momentarily spikes to 139.3, there is a corresponding – and drastic – alteration in Woodward’s EKG pattern. According to Dr. Gilberto Leon, a holistic medicine doctor in Chandler, AZ, the symmetrical pattern represents the characteristic waves of normal heart rhythm. The sudden irregularity, which he describes as a “massive” change in the pattern, occurs at a time when Woodward’s heart should be resting. Over time, this type of reaction makes the heart work too hard, causing fatigued cardiac function, Leon says. And, the process is symptomless and “silent” – especially in healthy people, who may not feel the disruption. Describing the bombardment of microwave frequencies as “an unnatural sequence of events that we’re not programmed to respond to,” Leon confirms that frequencies from smart meters have an effect on myocardial function. Troubling fact: Other meters in common use are more powerful than the one tested. Woodward notes that the Elster smart meter used in the video transmits at about ¼ of a watt. Other smart meters – including the Landis and Gyr Focus – transmit at just under one watt, making them roughly three times more powerful. Woodward points out that the power of the smart meter was controlled outside of his sight and hearing – meaning there is no way he could have consciously manipulated the experiment, even if he could somehow alter his actual heart rhythm on demand. Not only that, but he notes he does not have a heart condition or a history of one – nor does he take any medication that could affect his EKG readings. Go to end to watch the video: EKG Proof - Smart Meters Affect Your Heart https://youtu.be/p-aNRQNRtaI Smart meters are a threat not only to your health – but to your wallet as well According to an eye-opening Dutch study conducted by the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences and published in the scientific journal IEEE Electromagnetic Compatability Magazine, over half of the smart meters tested gave readings that were higher than the actual power consumed. And these were not modest or insignificant errors. In some cases, the false readings came in at a whopping 582 percent higher – with 581, 566 and 475 percent following close behind. This could theoretically result in a near six-fold increase in a utility bill – an outrageous rip-off. You can legally refuse to have a smart meter installed in your home – and here’s how. To begin the process of protecting your health and your rights, be sure to read “Forced vaccinations and smart meters – How to legally stop it” – which includes a podcast featuring Jonathan Landsman and consumer rights advocate, Jerry Day. Smart meters pose a fire risk On July 9, 2010, a Vacaville, CA man was killed by a fire caused by a Pacific Gas and Electric smart meter, with the fire consuming his house the day after contractors installed a Landis and Gyr meter. Larry Nikkel, a well-liked local musician who was on the eve of retirement from his day job as groundskeeper at Solano Community College, lost his life due to smoke inhalation and burns from electrical fire. It is believed that the meter may have been improperly installed, causing a dangerous phenomenon known as “arcing.” In violation of the FCC requirements that smart meters be installed by a professional electrician, workers at the Wellington Energy – the company that installed the meter – only receive 20 hours of training. A wrongful death lawsuit filed by the family against the utility company, subcontractor and meter manufacturer has since been settled for an undisclosed sum. And, there are other reports of smart meter fires throughout North America. In August 2012, PECO Energy of Pennsylvania was forced to suspend its deployment after 26 separate incidents in which smart meters either caught fire or exploded. In Canada, the Ontario Fire Marshall reported encountering “an unusual amount of fire incidents involving smart meters.” Many more incidents are documented at StopSmartMeters.org. Enough is enough: We must stand up and protect our lives Millions of people live, work and play in close proximity to smart meters, with apartment residents often forced to sleep near entire banks of them. Although we’ve been told by utility companies and utility regulators that smart meters are safe and have no effect, the fact is: smart meters may be affecting everyone’s health by stressing cardiac function. And, this in addition to the other serious threats to health, privacy and safety represented by these toxic devices. The American Academy of Environmental Medicine has already requested a recall of smart meters until their effects have been adequately studied. And, at the video’s end, Woodward echoes their plea, calling for a complete safety recall of all smart meters – immediately. But will the “powers that be” actually listen? Source: https://www.naturalhealth365.com/smart-meters-emf-2268.html Editor’s note: You can see part one and two – of the videos – here: https://youtu.be/UIobFr3m8kk An interview with a whistleblower back in in August 2014. The whistleblower was contracted to work on these death towers. The audio is not the greatest; however, by careful listening all can be heard and reveals some very disturbing details. Interviewer: “Are these towers endangering your lives?” Whistleblower: “Uh, yes, definitely.” Madisonstar Moon Published on Aug 24, 2014 Madison Star Moon interviews a death tower whistleblower. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2h7ckVw53c "There is no longer any connection between consensus, public health and public policy." Jerry Day Public policy is totally out of control. Video Published: October 24, 2017 By Cabin Talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8a7-PRswCrQ Where were the voters in general? The Board was creamed as voter turnout was abysmal. Comparing to a non-president election year for 2015, 2017 total votes for Town Boards candidates reflect a 28% drop in turnout close to 3,000 voters. And 2015 only had ONE position up for a vote! Thus, based on a rough estimate approximately 3,000 didn’t bother to cast their vote in the Town of Glenville. Compared between the two parties only 48 more votes went to the Democrat candidate. ONLY 48! There were 2954 fewer votes for the Republican candidate verses 2015. This is unbelievable! Where were you? The weather was good so there is no excuse there. Where were you? Were you making assumptions that incumbents always win? Maybe that holds essentially true for State and Federal but NOT local! Where were you? Sure many are giving up on New York and are leaving the state where these totals affect the local districts and towns. However, the populations’ totals have been consistent for the Town of Glenville and certainly did not experience a 28% drop. Did all you die? RIP if you did. However, most died morally and ethically. Where were you? There is no excuse for abdicating your civic duty to remain engaged and participate in the voting process. The town lost dearly due to your apathy, laziness, willful ignorance and lack of civic integrity. And if I run into any of you when you begin to complain about the likely 2018 and on detrimental effects that the two newly elected Board members (already proven liars) will likely create I will first ask you if you voted. If you are stupid enough to admit that you didn’t bother I will then tell you to shut up and that you failed the town to begin with. |
Archives
September 2020
Categories
All
|