5G Is A Crime Against Humanity A full length documentary by Sacha Stone exposing the 5G existential threat to humanity in a way we never imagined possible! Please SHARE this as widely as you feel drawn...use it to target your local bureaucrats, technocrats, health practitioners, local and federal government agencies and more than anything else...your family and friends. Featuring in this film: weapons development experts, biologists, molecular & cellular biologists, blood microscopists, activists, as well as good leaders out there on the frontline. We know what this technology is - we know how it was conceived and we know where it is intended to take people and planet. We are drawing the line here....and we are doing so with the full fire of consciousness. Arise Homo sapiens! NEP New Earth Project Published on Mar 23, 2019 5G Apocalypse - The Extinction Event #5GIsAnExtinctionEvent #5GLiscensedToKill #SayNoTo5G #5G #No5G #5GKills #CellTowers #SmartCities #EMFHarms #RFHarms #Geoengineering #WiFi #DEW #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #Health #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer
0 Comments
Mind numbing atrocities are now occurring with increasing frequency around the world. Most are planned by the players (State Sponsored) hiding behind the alleged perpetrator. They are then designed to instill fear with the ultimate goal to have complete control over every human being on the planet. Below is a series of articles and interviews highlighting the MO behind false flag events using the most recent at Christchurch as the example.
Undeniable Proof: CGI Used in New Zealand Shooting (continuing updates) Veterans Today By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor March 18, 2019 Ed. Note: There may be continuing updates if more info is acquired. Thus, excerpts here. Visit VT's website for the entire expose'. By Gordon Duff with Scott Bennett, Robert David Steele, Jim Fetzer and others Introduction by Gordon Duff The Nature and Intent of False Flag TerrorismWe are all now reexamining the video and problems are coming up. Here is the rub, the more problems we find, shotgun rounds coming out of a rifle, shotguns turning into rifles, disappearing shell casings, none of this is accidental. We are dealing with a heavily doctored video but not because, and this is my belief, we have no real dead. Here is the game: You commit an act, real dead, hired crisis actors, it doesn’t matter. This might well be a Syrian gas attack, one time 1200 dead, the next, hired kids paid with potato crisps and splashed down with bleach and dragged to the hospital by the White Helmets. Here, we have something else. We have fabricated fakery. I am seeing real people shot but I am also seeing video I believe has edited into it fake episodes as well, as with Sandy Hook. Remember the nuns in the van? Remember, when news crews arrived, the police chased and arrested a suspect that, soon after, simply disappeared? Remember Robbie Parker the giggling dad? Remember the school social worker who first saw the son of a teacher, looked him in the eye and next day denied it all? Remember the fake FBI agents speaking Hebrew, loudly, so reporters could hear? We have all this again. You see, you only have to sucker one blogger into declaring a “false flag” and taking the bait then all their evidence, all the real stuff, is fake as well. It is hard not to “hit for the fence” and put out an InfoWars/Fox News story. The public is hungry for something powerful and “insider” that may stem the feeling of loss and hopelessness those of us in the intelligence trade live with everyday. We saw it all with Charlie Hebdo in Paris, guns that had no bullets, much more powerful weapons fired from inches away to no effect. Here…why do we have low resolution when the original was in 4k? Why leak something “dumbed down” like the Pentagon “tiny little white plane attack” on 9/11? Never believe what you are given. On to today’s material: We have received information from our sources in India that this attack was planned and coordinated with the February 14 Kashmir attack. Netanyahu was scheduled to be in India on the 11th and both Netanyahu and India’s Modi are facing possible prison for kickback deals, Netanyahu for German subs and Modi for French jets. Israel runs India, rigs their elections like they do in the US and terrorism, in America, in New Zealand, in Kashmir, certainly in Paris and around the world, are part of their bag of tricks. VT received information from intelligence agency sources immediately after the New Zealand shooting that the suspect was a trained assassin and his cover identity and that of his family is largely false. That the family are Jews that immigrated to Britain and then Australia from Palestine in 1948 is, in itself, of no telling consequence. The video below is a test fire of a similar weapon noting rate of fire, for reference purposes only. Ed. Note: Screen shots are taken from DTube's channel showing the CGI used to make appear real fire occurred. Go to VT's article or directly to DTube's link titled Magically Disappearing Cartridges to view the video. Unlike You Tube that now censors and bans any truth, this video can not be removed. And now a reference video showing full automatic fire, which according to New Zealand authorities, was used during some of the original video: That the alleged shooter, and we are moving to that term, “alleged,” is extremely well known to intelligence agencies throughout Europe and elsewhere, trained in Israel, active inside Syria with terror groups, now that’s something else. The video above cannot be denied. There are other things wrong as well. We will be publishing more. Governments with Islamic populations are asking questions, even India, certainly Pakistan and others. There is a desire to send investigation teams. This is certainly a war on Islam. The media has already touched on wider involvement here and our sources say it is international and involves multiple organizations. There has to be a real inquiry, starting here, then a new look at MH17 and MH370. A mechanism for investigating all terror acts for deception and fakery. The assumption has to be, as our team includes those who have, on behalf of the US, staged fake terror attacks, that terrorism is, too often, used as justification of policies that run contrary to the interests of the United States and the welfare of the republic and those who serve here. From Scott Bennett: THE NEW ZEALAND SHOOTING: WHAT HAPPENED AND WHY? By Scott Bennett, Ph.D. (abd) Former U.S. Army Psychological Operations Officer and State Department Counterterrorism Contractor OVERVIEW There may be more to the New Zealand shooting event which just occurred than meets the eye. In fact, there is a very real possibility that it may have been the “Pearl Harbor” attack in a long campaign against President Trump, designed ultimately to neutralize the conservative republican base, weaken President Trump, and take-over America in a blitzkrieg of political turmoil. Here’s how, theoretically, the plan seems to be unfolding. FORENSIC ANALYSIS: Now let me first start out by saying that after thoroughly examining the 17 minute video of the shooter frame-by-frame, and after applying deductive reasoning in the forensic analysis, I am convinced this was a false-flag event for the following reasons:
Additionally, no pools of blood can be seen either around the bodies on the floor after being shot, except from one body which strangely appears lying next to the first victim in the doorway, which was not present when the shooter initially entered. So this suggests the body or actor was placed in that position, with blood added afterwards.
The shooter then drives off with music playing in the background, either from his car radio or bluetooth headset, that resembles some kind of hokey Pulp Fiction type soundtrack, as he comments on the shooting thrills and challenges to his Youtube type audience. The video then stops. THE WHY? THEORETICAL RATIONALE BEHIND THE NEW ZEALAND PSYOP I have translated the New Zealand PSYOP campaign into the standard metrics of an advertising campaign, which implements a specific layout of goals, objectives, strategy, tactics—with each element working to compliment, advance and achieve the ultimate goal of the campaign. This might explain the agenda of the far left globalist democrat and how the New Zealand operation fits into the bigger picture. It’s what I would do if I was a God-hating, sexually schizophrenic, liberty fearing Leftist—which thankfully I am not. The leftist campaign may unfold as follows: THE GOAL: Political takeover of the United States OBJECTIVE: Neutralize Right-Wing, Conservative Republican Christian base of President Trump STRATEGY: Brand Right-Wing, Conservative Republican Christians as violent extremists threatening civilized society. TACTIC: Generate false-flag events where Right-Wing, Conservative Republican Christians are blamed for acts of violent extremism, such as shootings, bombings, staged protests, government building takeovers (i.e., Malheur Refuge, etc.). TACTIC: Orient Department of Justice and all law enforcement agencies to elevate white, right-wing, conservative republican Christians to top of list of domestic threats and terrorist list, and consequently increase incidents of “stop, investigate, and arrest” actions against this group. TACTIC: Increase red-flag gun confiscation laws by including the justification for this action will include allegations of participation in white, right-wing, conservative republican Christian suspect groups or activities. TACTIC: Conduct Democrat controlled House Committee hearings on white, right-wing, conservative republican Christians and directly associate President Trump with rhetoric and beliefs and agenda of this white, right-wing, conservative republican Christians terrorist group. THE WHO? Who benefits? Certainly not right-wing, christians-conservative republican white Americans—or white people in general. Certainly not Trump, as the shrill cries by leftist Democrats calling for blood, punishment, and repentance by him for seemingly speaking rhetoric that conveniently resembles the alleged rhetoric of this kind of shooter—even though the manifesto allegedly written by the shooter does not claim support for conservatism. Indeed the manifesto seems more likely written by a leftist inarticulately trying to channel or inhabit the language and ideas of conservatives, albeit deceptively. The winners in this always seem to be the political-police-military industrial complex who get expanded budgets, more powers, less limitations, and more license to control and abuse the civilian population; as well as the media—which like vampires feed on the fear of their audience through Nielsen ratings. And who controls the media? From what I’ve seen by many sources and analysts, judging by most ethnic-religious-political identity charts—and I say this with no phobic prejudice or bigotry in mind—it is always a Jewish-Israeli establishment of Ivy league leftists. That’s just how it is—good or bad. The next question becomes, “Why is that?” Perhaps we can explore that another day. For now, let’s stay on the shooting event and evidence of fakery. CONCLUSION: The two years of needless agony the American people were put through during the Watergate hearings are nothing compared to what the media and democrats have intentionally put the American people through in their accusations of treasonous corruption and indeed spying they have made against President Trump. It is important to understand that this act by the media and democrats was more than acrimonious or even deceptive political debate. It was an act of the most grotesque and violent selfishness and hysterical arrogance and blind self-righteousness manipulation ever to transpire in American politics. It is nothing more than a shabby—albeit vicious—attempt at overthrowing America’s political system and leadership in a Bolshevik type revolution by implementing the tyranny of the majority to overthrow the American Constitutional Republic into a mob like democracy where numbers of people—legal and illegal—in the United States ultimately supplant the electoral college and sovereignty of the individual states. It is an attempt to overthrow the Republic and replace it with a police state socialist democracy, with the “enlightened” political-academic-media elite at the top, the thuggish police-military industrial complex in the middle, and everyone else on the bottom. This cannot be allowed to take place, and indeed civil wars and wars of independence and spiritual revolutions and revivals ignite as a result of these types of conditions and events. Time will tell how Americans will react to the next stage of this psyop, but I can say boldly, “as for me and my house, we will serve the truth”….and the God of all truth, without any fear of man. Scott Bennett Read More: Undeniable Proof: CGI Used in New Zealand Shooting (continuing updates) Time and time again crisis actors do a terrible job at acting. One 'dead' actor couldn't wait to stay off his smart phone and was caught texting. And this appears to be both the 'Texting Dude' and 'Hero Dad'. Here's an excerpt and photo taken for The Fellowship of the Minds where photos shows where this dude can also play the part of the hero dad: This post is about the shooting at the second mosque — the Linwood Islamic Centre. Interesting how that smart phone remains glued in his left hand while the two year searches for sign of life..... More from this article: But wait, you say. Investigating this shooting can conclude that the New Zealand event was completely staged and the role of censorship along with the media in manipulating public opinion in order to pass legislation contrary to the public interest. Whenever a tragic event occurs consider in avoiding in jumping to immediate conclusions of what really occurred and the motives if viewing from main stream narratives as even merely a drivel of truth is rarely given. It is getting more difficult in locating good sources for careful and objective research as these sources are buried pages deep in the popular search engine algorithms (DuckDuckGo is an excellent search engine and a great alternative). Bookmark those sources that can be properly vetted as the social media platforms are now actively censoring. Christchurch Uncovered and the Analysis of the Event
#Christchurch #FalseFlag #MassMindControl #GunControl #5G #MKUltra #NWO #CognitiveDissonance #StateSponsored #PSYOP The attack on American freedoms is now unprecedented. Social media platforms along with major media outlets are censoring any form of information that does not align with their ideological, corporate and government sponsored lines. All one needs to ask if this censoring actually is an intentional and deliberate attempt to suppress not only the actual truth but also effectively destroying our freedom of speech. Dr. John Bergman Published on Mar 17, 2019 Visit Dr. John Bergman's You Tube site for outstanding instructional health videos. Health Is your Natural State The Loss of Freedom of Speech
#VaccineTruth #VaccineDangers #VaccineChoice #SaveOurChildren #StopMandatoryVaccines #HealthFreedom #FreedomOfSpeech #1stAmendment EMF Action Network Premiered February 23, 2019 EMF Action Network:
5G in 5 Minutes
#5GIsAnExtinctionEvent #5GLiscensedToKill #SayNoTo5G #5G #No5G #5GKills #CellTowers #SmartCities #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #DEW #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #Health #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer Smart Cities = Enslaved Citizens By Patrick M. Wood, Author of Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order In 1932, Aldous Huxley foresaw a Scientific Dictatorship in his book, Brave New World. In 2019, Huxley’s dystopian future is appearing right before our eyes, but few recognize it. - Patrick Wood People who have a modern smartphone normally think of 5G as nothing more than a progression from 3G and 4G. Offering fewer dropped calls, faster data transfer, and more convenience. 5G is the fifth generation of wireless technology. This thinking barely scratches the surface. There must be a greater reason why CEOs of major cellular carriers are breaking their necks to railroad the fastest implementation in history of a new communication standard. This reason has little to do with your personal cellphone and everything to do with the so-called Internet of Things (IoT) where all electronic devices will be connected together in real-time. Collectively, the IoT is the core technology used to implement Smart City makeovers. “Real time” is a magical tech term. 5G is at least one order of magnitude faster than anything before it. It is comparable to everything being connected directly by fiber-optic cable where as soon as you touch the send key, your data transmission is received at the other end, faster than a blink of your eye. Let’s do some math. 4G can transfer data at 100,000,000 bits per second (which is 10 megabits per second). That’s really fast! However, 5G blows out the same data at 10,000,000,000 bits per second, or 10 Gbps (Gigabits per second). This is 100 times faster than 4G. Secondly, 4G has a typical “ping” factor between 10ms and 50ms (milliseconds) that measures the time needed in order to send a single packet of information. 5G drops that time to 1ms. In spite of the cutthroat American race between wireless providers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile, China has declared that it intends to emerge as the global leader on 5G rollout to its own 1.4 billion citizens. China is also mass-producing the technology to sell to the rest of the world. In the U.S., 5G is being heavily promoted by the Trump Administration. The Federal Communications Commission issued a ruling in September that blocks cities from charging higher fees for installing 5G infrastructure. Loud protests have been registered from the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National Association of Counties, the National Governors Association and the Nation Conference of State Legislatures. Why? Because the FCC’s actions are unconstitutional and cities are being stripped of the little sovereignty they have left. Thus far, the FCC is undeterred in its position. Smart City technology is brought to us exclusively by Big Tech corporations in the name of Technocracy and Sustainable Development. With the advent of sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs, massive amounts of data collected from sensors of all types can be analyzed in real-time, displaying the results in a multi-dimensional model. What are sensors? Cameras, microphones, self-driving vehicles, license-plate readers, cell phones, Bluetooth devices, Smart Meters and all connected devices in Smart Homes. Thanks to real-time connections between autonomous vehicles, road censors and central computers equipped with AI, they will be able to navigate any and all roadways with authority and impunity. They will also inform on you every inch of the way. In China, where all of this massive surveillance is weaponized against civilians, Technocrats have implemented a Social Credit Score assigned by algorithm, to all 1.4 billion inhabitants. By 2020, China intends to have 600 million facial recognition cameras installed, or about one camera for every 4 citizens. All of them will transmit their images in real-time to central computers running sophisticated AI programs. Each person in the big-data database will have their personal data pulled from every conceivable location in the nation. By the time that they know who you are, what you are, what you do, what you think and what you intend to do, their AI algorithms will calculate and assign to you a Social Credit Score that will limit or expand whatever privileges you will have from that time on. The Social Credit Score system is coming to America as well, unless we somehow convince our own officials that this is a horrible idea that will utterly destroy the American dream. Nothing has changed in the 85 years since Technocracy, Inc. defined its original mission in 1938: Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population. Scoffers may argue that history does not mean anything and there is no relevance to modern times. If they understood history, they would not say such a thing. For instance, consider ‘ride-sharing’ schemes where nobody owns a vehicle and everyone shares a common pool of community owned autos. This idea is not new. Technocrats had it in their sights as early as 1934: The Automotive Branch of Transportation would provide a network of garages at convenient places all over the country from which automobiles could be had at any hour of the night or day. No automobiles would be privately owned. When one wished to use an automobile he would merely call the garage, present his driver’s license, and a car of the type needed would be assigned to him. ‘When he was through with the car, he would return it either to the same garage or to any other garage that happened to be convenient, and surrender his Energy Certificates in payment for the cost incurred while he was using it. I will suggest that the modern world cannot be even remotely understood except in terms of Technocracy and its inevitable outcome: Scientific Dictatorship. Every major meme in global geopolitics, economics and globalization, devolution of national sovereignty, etc., is dancing to the Technocrat drumbeat. As to today, 5G is about to deliver the ultimate tool for total control over Americans, and it has nothing to do with your cell phones getting a speed upgrade. Patrick Wood where his site is Technocracy News Article source Total Data Domination: 5G, IoT, A.I. Surveillance and the Smart City . Total Data Domination: 5G, IoT, A.I. Surveillance and the Smart City
#5GIsAnExtinctionEvent #5GLiscensedToKill #SayNoTo5G #5G #No5G #5GKills #CellTowers #SmartCities #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #DEW #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #Health #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer Cell Phone RADIATION & 5G DANGERS | An In-Depth Exploration
#5GIsAnExtinctionEvent #SaveTheInsects #5GLiscensedToKill #SayNoTo5G #5G #No5G #5GKills #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #DEW #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #Health #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer The first eight months of WWII with no fighting – was called The Phoney War. Using millimetre waves as a fifth-generation or 5G wireless communications technology is a phoney war of another kind. This phoney war is also silent, but this time shots are being fired – in the form of laser-like beams of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from banks of thousands of tiny antennas[1] – and almost no one in the firing line knows that they are being silently, seriously and irreparably injured. In the first instance, 5G is likely to make people electro-hypersensitive (EHS).[2] Perhaps it was sitting in front of two big computer screens for many of the 18 years I worked at the UN that made me EHS. When the UN Office at Vienna installed powerful WiFi and cellphone access points – designed to serve large, public areas – in narrow, metal-walled corridors throughout the Vienna International Centre in December 2015, I was ill continuously for seven months. I did my best for two and a half years to alert the UN staff union, administration and medical service to the danger to the health of UN staff of EMR from these access points, but was ignored. That’s why, in May 2018, I took the issue to the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres [transcript]. He is a physicist and electrical engineer and lectured on telecommunications signals early in his career, yet asserted that he knew nothing about this. He undertook to ask the World Health Organization to look into it, but seven months later those public access points remain in place. I received no replies to my many follow-up emails. As a result, I welcomed the opportunity to join the effort to publish an International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space because it was clear to me that, despite there having been 43 earlier scientific appeals, very few people understood the dangers of EMR. My experience as an editor could help ensure that a new 5G appeal, including the issue of beaming 5G from space, was clear, comprehensive, explanatory, and accessible to the non-scientist. The International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space is fully referenced, citing over a hundred scientific papers among the tens of thousands on the biological effects of EMR published over the last 80 years.[3] Having spent years editing UN documents dealing with space, I know that outer space is hotly contested geopolitically and any untoward event involving a military satellite risks triggering a catastrophic response.[4] Space law is so inadequate – just one example is the complexity of space liability law [5],[6] – that we could really call the Earth orbits a new Wild West. China caused international consternation in 2007 when it demonstrated an anti-satellite weapon by destroying its own satellite. Space debris is the main concern among space-faring nations, with a so-called Kessler syndrome positing a cascade of space debris that could make the Earth orbits unusable for a thousand years.[7] Does launching 20,000+ commercial 5G satellites in such circumstances sound rational to you? I live in Vienna, Austria, where the 5G rollout is suddenly upon us. Within the last five weeks, pre-5G has been officially announced at Vienna airport and 5G at the Rathausplatz, the main square in Vienna, which attracts tens of thousands of visitors to its Christmas market each December and skating rink each January, which are special treats for children. Along with birds and insects, children are the most vulnerable to 5G depredation because of their little bodies.[8] Friends and acquaintances and their children in Vienna are already reporting the classic symptoms of EMR poisoning:[9] nosebleeds, headaches, eye pains, chest pains, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, tinnitus, dizziness, flu-like symptoms, and cardiac pain. They also report a tight band around the head; pressure on the top of the head; short, stabbing pains around the body; and buzzing internal organs. Other biological effects such as tumours and dementia usually take longer to manifest, but in the case of 5G, which has never been tested for health or safety, who knows?[10] Seemingly overnight a forest of 5G infrastructure has sprouted in Austria. In the space of three weeks one friend has gone from robust health to fleeing this country, where she has lived for 30 years. Each person experiences EMR differently. For her, it was extreme torture so she and I spent her last two nights in Austria sleeping in the woods. Interestingly, as she drove across southern Germany, she suffered torture even worse than in Austria, while in northern Germany she had no symptoms at all and felt completely normal, which suggests that there has been as yet no 5G rollout there. There are no legal limits on exposure to EMR. Conveniently for the telecommunications industry, there are only non-legally enforceable guidelines such as those produced by the grandly named International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection, which turns out to be like the Wizard of Oz, just a tiny little NGO in Germany that appoints its own members, none of whom is a medical doctor or environmental expert.[11] Like the Wizard of Oz, ICNIRP seems to have magical powers. Its prestidigitation makes non-thermal (non-heating) effects of EMR exposure disappear into thin air, for taking into account the tens of thousands of research studies demonstrating the biological effects of EMR would invalidate its so-called safety guidelines.[12]It has bewitched the International Telecommunication Union, part of the UN family, into recognising these guidelines.[13] And one little email sent to ICNIRP in October 2018 to submit Professor Martin Pall’s comments on ICNIRP’s new draft guidelines conjured up an immediate explosion of interest in the sender’s online presence – which had hitherto attracted none – from companies and individuals worldwide, one country’s immigration authorities, the office of the Austrian Chancellor (head of government), a firm of lawyers in Vienna and even Interpol![14],[15] I hope that people read and share our Stop 5G Space Appeal to wake up themselves and others quickly and use it to take action themselves to stop 5G. Even eight short months of this 5G Phoney War could spell catastrophe for all life on Earth. Elon Musk is set to launch the first 4,425 5G satellites in June 2019 and “blanket” the Earth with 5G, in breach of countless international treaties. This could initiate the last great extinction, courtesy of the multi-trillion-US-dollar 5G, the biggest biological experiment and most heinous manifestation of hubris and greed in human history.[10] People’s first reaction to the idea that 5G may be an existential threat to all life on Earth is usually disbelief and/or cognitive dissonance. Once they examine the facts, however, their second reaction is often terror. We need to transcend this in order to see 5G as an opportunity to empower ourselves, take responsibility and take action. We may have already lost 80 per cent of our insects to EMR in the last 20 years.[16] Our trees risk being cut down by the millions in order to ensure continuous 5G signalling for self-driving cars, buses and trains.[17] Are we going to stand by and see ourselves and our children irradiated, our food systems decimated, our natural surroundings destroyed? Our newspapers are now casually popularising the meme that human extinction would be a good thing,[18],[19] but when the question becomes not rhetorical but real, when it’s your life, your child, your community, your environment that is under immediate threat, can you really subscribe to such a suggestion? If you don’t, please sign the Stop 5G Appeal and get active in contacting everyone you can think of who has the power to stop 5G, especially Elon Musk[20] and the CEOs of all the other companies planning to launch 5G satellites, starting in just 20 weeks from now. Life on Earth needs your help now. The transcript of my exchange with the UN Secretary-General of 14 May 2018 follows:
Note to readers: please click the share buttons below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc. Claire Edwards, BA Hons, MA – worked for the United Nations as Editor and Trainer in Intercultural Writing from 1999 to 2017. Notes [1] Delos, Peter. “The Way to a New Phased Array Radar Architecture.” TechTime: Electronics & Technology News. January 15, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://techtime.news/2018/01/ 15/analog-devices-phased-array-radar/. “Although there is a lot of discussion of massive MIMO and automotive radar, it should not be forgotten that most of the recent radar development and beamforming R&D has been in the defense industry, and it is now being adapted for commercial applications. While phased array and beamforming moved from R&D efforts to reality in the 2000s, a new wave of defense focused arrays are now expected, enabled by industrial technology offering solutions that were previously cost prohibitive.” [2] “Electrosensitive Testimonials.” We Are The Evidence. 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019.http://wearetheevidence.org/adults-who-developed-electro-sensitivity/. “WATE intends to expose the suppressed epidemic of sickness, suffering and human rights crisis created by wireless technology radiation; elevate the voice of those injured; defend and secure their rights and compel society and governments to take corrective actions and inform the public of the harm.” [3] Glaser, Lt. Z. “Cumulated Index to the Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (‘effects’) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-frequency Radiation: Report, Supplements (no. 1-9).” BEMS Newsletter B-1 through B-464 (1984). Accessed January 1, 2019. http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Zory-Glasers-index.pdf. Lt. Zorach Glaser, PhD, catalogued 5,083 studies, books and conference reports for the US Navy through 1981. [4] “Space Sustainability: A Practical Guide.” Secure World Foundation, 2014, 21. Accessed January 1, 2019.https://swfound.org/media/206289/swf_space_sustainability-a_practical_guide_2018__1.pdf. “However, as more countries integrate space into their national military capabilities and rely on space-based information for national security, there is an increased chance that any interference (either actual or perceived) with satellites could spark or escalate tensions and conflict in space or on Earth. This is made all the more difficult by the challenge of determining the exact cause of a satellite malfunction: whether it was due to a space weather event, impact by space debris, unintentional interference, or deliberate act of aggression.” [5] “Space Law: Liability for Space Debris.” Panish, Shea & Boyle LLP. 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019.https://www.aviationdisasterlaw.com/liability-for-space-debris/. “Filing a lawsuit against SpaceX for space debris is a little different than one against the commercial industry or state-sponsored launch. Since SpaceX is a private company, injured parties can file claims directly against the establishment in accord with the state’s personal injury laws. For the claim to be successful, the plaintiff will have to prove that SpaceX was negligent in some way that caused the space debris collision. Space law is notoriously complex, making it very difficult for injured parties to recover for [sic] their damages in California.” [6]Von Der Dunk, Frans G. “Liability versus Responsibility in Space Law: Misconception or Misconstruction?” University of Nebraska-Lincoln College of Law: Space, Cyber, and Telecommunications Law Program Faculty Publications 21 (1992). Accessed January 1, 2019. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/spacelaw/21/?utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu/spacelaw/ [7]Kessler, D. J., P. M. Landry, B. G. Cour-Palais, and R. E. Taylor. “Aerospace: Collision Avoidance in Space: Proliferating Payloads and Space Debris Prompt Action to Prevent Accidents.” IEEE Spectrum 17, no. 6 (1980): 37-41. [8] Morgan, L. Lloyd, Santosh Kesari, and Devra Lee Davis. “Why Children Absorb More Microwave Radiation than Adults: The Consequences.” Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 2, no. 4 (December 2014): 197-204. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S2213879X14000583. Highlights: (1) Children absorb more microwave radiation (MWR) than adults. (2) MWR is a Class 2B (possible) carcinogen. (3) The fetus is in greater danger than children from exposure to MWR. (4) The legal exposure limits have remained unchanged for decades. (5) Cellphone manuals warnings and the 20 cm rule for tablets/laptops violate the “normal operating position” regulation. [9]Electro Hypersensitivity: Talking to Your Doctor. PDF. Canadian Initiative to Stop Wireless, Electric, and Electromagnetic Pollution. http://weepinitiative.org/talkingtoyourdoctor.pdf. [10]FCC Chairman on 5G: “We won’t study it, regulate it, have standards for it.” Youtube. June 20, 2016. Accessed January 1, 2019. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bwgwe01SIMc. Notes in video: Ultra-high frequency radiation (24 to 100 GHz or more); aimed and amplified signals; massive deployment of towers; worth billions; no standards, no testing; sharing with satellite and military operations; all areas (including rural areas) to be saturated with radiation; all local deployments to be fast-tracked; everything to be microchipped. [11] Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD. “Is ICNIRP Reliable Enough to Dictate Meaning of Science to the Governmental Risk Regulators?” Between a Rock and a Hard Place(blog), April 8, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019.https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/type/gallery/. “The major problems of ICNIRP are: (1) it is a “private club” where members elect new members without need to justify selection; (2) lack of accountability before anyone; (3) lack of transparency of their activities; (4) complete lack of supervision of its activities; (5) skewed science evaluation because of the close similarity of the opinions of all members of the Main Commission and all of the other scientists selected as advisors to the Main Commission.” [12] Matthes, Rüdiger. “EMF Safety Guidelines: The ICNIRP View.” International Telecommunications Union Workshop on Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, May 9, 2013. Accessed January 1, 2019.https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/climatechange/emf-1305/Documents/Presentations/s2part1p1-Rued igerMatthes.pdf. [13] ITU Telecommunication Development Sector Study Group 2: Session on Modern Policies, Guidelines, Regulations and Assessments of Human Exposure to RF-EMF. Session 1: Recent Activities on Human Exposure to RF-EMF in ITU and ICNIRP, Geneva, Switzerland. October 10, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019.www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Study-Groups/2018-2021/Pages/ meetings/session-Q7-2-oct18.aspx. “Session 1 will discuss some of the recent activities held in ITU and describe the latest updates to the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection) guidelines.” [14] Martin L. Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University. Response to 2018 ICNIRP Draft Guidelines and Appendices on Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields (100 KHz to 300 GHz). October 8, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019.www.5gexposed.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/FINAL-Martin-L-Pall-Response-to-2018-Draft-Guidelines-8.10.18.pdf. [15] Cooperation Agreement Between The International Criminal Police Organization Interpol and The International Telecommunication Union. Plenipotentiary Conference (PP-18) Dubai 29 October–16 November 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/md/18/pp/c/S18-PP-C-0047!!MSW-E.docx. “2. In implementing the Agreement, each Party shall act within their respective areas of competence. More specifically, the implementation of the Agreement by ITU shall not exceed beyond its mandate pertaining to building confidence and security in the use of ICTs, in accordance to Plenipotentiary Conference Resolution 130 (Rev. Busan, 2014) and to its role on child online protection in accordance to Plenipotentiary Conference Resolution 179 (Rev. Busan, 2014), whereas the implementation of the Agreement by INTERPOL shall not exceed its mandate as defined by article 2 of its Constitution which include activities pertaining to cybercrime and online child exploitation”. (emphasis added) [16] Hallmann C.A., M. Sorg and E. Jongejans. “More than 75 per cent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas.” PLOS One 12, no. 10 (2017): e0185809.http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185809&type=printable. Accessed January 1, 2019. [17] Laville, Sandra. “Millions of Trees at Risk in Secretive Network Rail Felling Programme.” The Guardian, April 29, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/ apr/29/millions-of-trees-at-risk-in-secretive-network-rail-felling-programme. [18] May, Todd. “Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?” The New York Times, December 17, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/17/opinion/human-extinction-climate-change.html. [19] Davis, Nicola. “Falling total fertility rate should be welcomed, population expert says: figures showing declining birth rates are ‘cause for celebration’, not alarm.” The Guardian, December 26, 2018. Accessed January 3, 2019. www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/26/falling-total-fertility-rate-should-be-welcomed-population-expert-says. [20] “Planet Earth: Worldwide 5G Radiation from Orbit?” Letter from Claus Scheingraber, Roland Wolff and others to Elon Musk. June 18, 2018. Brunnthal, Germany. “… We are sure that your satellite project is already at an advanced stage. But even if much money has been invested, one should consider that it is only a matter of time until the fact of damaging health potential of mobile communications – and especially of 5G-mobile communication – can no longer we overlooked. Therefore we emphatically recommend not to implement the satellite project.” (Letter in German) (Letter in English) Featured image is from TruePublica What You Don't Know About 5G but Will Find Out When It's Too Late
#5GIsAnExtinctionEvent #SaveTheInsects #5GLiscensedToKill #SayNoTo5G #5G #No5G #5GKills #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #DEW #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #Health #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer Dana Ashlie Published on Jan 25, 2019 Dana Ashlie's summary: Anonymous insider shares what we all may face...and how to prepare. Ex-Department of Homeland Sec. employee tells all she experienced with her declining health working next to 5G Tech! Shocking interview on real world impacts of this coming technology. Ex DHS Employee Reveals All in This Interview on This Coming Technology #5G #No5G #DHS #TSA #CellTowers #Satellites #5GSatellites #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #DEW #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #Health #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer 5G Licensed to Kill. The Insect Inspector investigates what you are not being told about the 5G grid1/30/2019 When it comes to #5G the insects and their population decline is the canary in the coalmine. The critical summary text with the You Tube presentation below is by mickeytwonames, publisher, 5G Licenced to Kill. The Insect Inspector investigates what you are not being told about the 5G grid 5G is a buzzword for the digitally connected world some see as the future of mankind - it comes with risks - the most immediate being that it will be the most effective pesticide since DDT. The Insect Inspector explains how this runaway untested global experiment may kill us all. Simply put, the 30-year radiation from millions of cellular phone masts is the single factor present in every region of insect decline. With the imminent addition of 5G pollution, the situation is about to get much worse. Rather than ridiculing this idea, independent experts from around the world sent me evidence to prove It. They cited papers, experiments, and surveys to show that wireless tech is damaging the ecosphere. Insects are like the canary in the coal mine. Their slump in numbers is a warning to us all. In short, 5G poses a catastrophic threat to bugs the world over. This video is a warning notice so public officials can no longer plead ignorance when rubber stamping its roll-out. 5G is a buzz word for connecting every 'smart' wireless device. The phone, software and internet giants aka Big Wireless are in a bid to dominate society with the Internet of Things - that means controlling as many of your gadgets as they can harvest your profile data from. It is also a push to build a world of industrious robots, automated vehicles and a population of addicted phone Zombies. We are being softened up to accept 5G as "inevitable." Across the media, it is being sold as "game-changing - the next big thing." What no one tells you is how much of a dangerous gamble it is to expose everything on the planet to untested ultra-high-frequency microwave radiation at an unprecedented intensity. The 5G grid, a follow-on, not a replacement for the wireless network we now use, is being built by a powerful self-regulating industry that tolerates no restraint nor criticism. Big Wireless claims 5G is a safe technology on which to build the digital society they want us to connect to. Let me outline the side effects that no one is prepared to talk about but are unavoidable. G5 devices use very high electromagnetic frequencies. Ubiquitous transmitters, planned for every school, shop, and neighbourhood, will generate billions of millimetre length waves. These signals will be the same size as most insects creating an electrical charge between the two. The energy flow also pulses creating tiny shockwaves that damage eyes, wings, antennae, and other delicate body parts. 5G communications have to be powerful enough to penetrate buildings so with nowhere to hide and under relentless bombardment, insects, trapped in an environmental microwave oven, will simply cook. Despite the evidence that 5G is an environmental hazard, the body that regulates Big Wireless has been hijacked by those it is supposed to regulate. It has gained powers and brought influence to steamroller anyone opposed to its impatience to be the first to market. With Governments everywhere lobbied with biased data, the benefits of the 5G Grid are purposely overblown and the drawbacks hidden. No tests have been run for potential damage to the environment - a failing that goes against the UN's Precautionary Principle. A risk analysis put in place after it was proved the asbestos and tobacco industries concealed known risks and dangers. Radiation levels will be100 times above the standards agreed 20 years ago. 5G safety standards are unfit for purpose. We live with wireless tech in our pockets. There is Wifi in our homes already claiming to be 5G - it is not. It is a dupe to make the term acceptable. So dismissing the link of insect decline to invisible wireless radiation is an easy option. But all the signs point to a strong connection between the two. From bugs to birdsong, small things disappearing easily escape our notice, but Insects make our life possible. Their destruction breaks a vital in the food chain. We are not going to give up the convenience of hand-held devices, but we are being hustled into expensive enslavement where we pay for the privilege of being monitored. Make no mistake when all the 5G cells are connected our children will be living in a global airport body scanner 24/7. It's critical to postpone the rollout of what scientists, environmental groups, doctors and citizens see as a potentially toxic infrastructure without a public debate. We must not blindly accept every technological development especially one we are tricked into thinking as Green. Wireless tech gobbles up a whopping 10% of the world's electricity consumption. Let us not sleepwalk towards an insect armageddon that may herald our own. 5G Licensed to Kill. The Insect Inspector investigates what you are not being told about the 5G grid. #SaveTheInsects #5GLiscensedToKill #SayNoTo5G #5G #No5G #5GKills #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #DEW #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #Health #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer By John W. Whitehead “As more and more data flows from your body and brain to the smart machines via the biometric sensors, it will become easy for corporations and government agencies to know you, manipulate you, and make decisions on your behalf. Even more importantly, they could decipher the deep mechanisms of all bodies and brains, and thereby gain the power to engineer life. If we want to prevent a small elite from monopolising such godlike powers, and if we want to prevent humankind from splitting into biological castes, the key question is: who owns the data? Does the data about my DNA, my brain and my life belong to me, to the government, to a corporation, or to the human collective?”―Professor Yuval Noah Harari Uncle Sam wants you. Correction: Uncle Sam wants your DNA. Actually, if the government gets its hands on your DNA, they as good as have you in their clutches. Get ready, folks, because the government— helped along by Congress (which adopted legislation allowing police to collect and test DNA immediately following arrests), President Trump (who signed the Rapid DNA Act into law), the courts (which have ruled that police can routinely take DNA samples from people who are arrested but not yet convicted of a crime), and local police agencies (which are chomping at the bit to acquire this new crime-fighting gadget)—is embarking on a diabolical campaign to create a nation of suspects predicated on a massive national DNA database. As the New York Times reports: The science-fiction future, in which police can swiftly identify robbers and murderers from discarded soda cans and cigarette butts, has arrived. In 2017, President Trump signed into law the Rapid DNA Act, which, starting this year, will enable approved police booking stations in several states to connect their Rapid DNA machines to Codis, the national DNA database. Genetic fingerprinting is set to become as routine as the old-fashioned kind. Referred to as “magic boxes,” these Rapid DNA machines—portable, about the size of a desktop printer, highly unregulated, far from foolproof, and so fast that they can produce DNA profiles in less than two hours—allow police to go on fishing expeditions for any hint of possible misconduct using DNA samples. Journalist Heather Murphy explains: As police agencies build out their local DNA databases, they are collecting DNA not only from people who have been charged with major crimes but also, increasingly, from people who are merely deemed suspicious, permanently linking their genetic identities to criminal databases. Suspect Society, meet the American police state. Every dystopian sci-fi film we’ve ever seen is suddenly converging into this present moment in a dangerous trifecta between science, technology and a government that wants to be all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful. By tapping into your phone lines and cell phone communications, the government knows what you say. By uploading all of your emails, opening your mail, and reading your Facebook posts and text messages, the government knows what you write. By monitoring your movements with the use of license plate readers, surveillance cameras and other tracking devices, the government knows where you go. By churning through all of the detritus of your life--what you read, where you go, what you say—the government can predict what you will do. By mapping the synapses in your brain, scientists—and in turn, the government--will soon know what you remember. And by accessing your DNA, the government will soon know everything else about you that they don’t already know: your family chart, your ancestry, what you look like, your health history, your inclination to follow orders or chart your own course, etc. Of course, none of these technologies are foolproof. Nor are they immune from tampering, hacking or user bias. Nevertheless, they have become a convenient tool in the hands of government agents to render null and void the Constitution’s requirements of privacy and its prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures. Consequently, no longer are we “innocent until proven guilty” in the face of DNA evidence that places us at the scene of a crime, behavior sensing technology that interprets our body temperature and facial tics as suspicious, and government surveillance devices that cross-check our biometrics, license plates and DNA against a growing database of unsolved crimes and potential criminals. The government’s questionable acquisition and use of DNA to identify individuals and “solve” crimes has come under particular scrutiny in recent years. Until recently, the government was required to at least observe some basic restrictions on when, where and how it could access someone’s DNA. That has all been turned on its head by various U.S. Supreme Court rulings that pave the way for suspicionless searches and herald the loss of privacy on a cellular level. Certainly, it was difficult enough trying to protect our privacy in the wake of a 2013 Supreme Court ruling in Maryland v. King that likened DNA collection to photographing and fingerprinting suspects when they are booked, thereby allowing the government to take DNA samples from people merely “arrested” in connection with “serious” crimes. Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Maryland v. King is worth reading not only for the history lesson on the Fourth Amendment but for its clear-sighted rebuke of the police state’s tendency to justify every encroachment on our freedoms as necessary for security. As Scalia noted: Solving unsolved crimes is a noble objective, but it occupies a lower place in the American pantheon of noble objectives than the protection of our people from suspicionless law-enforcement searches… Make no mistake about it: As an entirely predictable consequence of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national DNA database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason. Today’s judgment will, to be sure, have the beneficial effect of solving more crimes; then again, so would the taking of DNA samples from anyone who flies on an airplane (surely the Transportation Security Administration needs to know the “identity” of the flying public), applies for a driver’s license, or attends a public school. Perhaps the construction of such a genetic panopticon is wise. But I doubt that the proud men who wrote the charter of our liberties would have been so eager to open their mouths for royal inspection. The Court’s decision to let stand the Maryland Court of Appeals’ ruling in Raynor v. Maryland, which essentially determined that individuals do not have a right to privacy when it comes to their DNA, made Americans even more vulnerable to the government accessing, analyzing and storing their DNA without their knowledge or permission. Although Glenn Raynor, a suspected rapist, willingly agreed to be questioned by police, he refused to provide them with a DNA sample. No problem. Police simply swabbed the chair in which Raynor had been sitting and took what he refused to voluntarily provide. Raynor’s DNA was a match, and the suspect became a convict. As the dissenting opinion in Raynor for the Maryland Court of Appeals rightly warned, a person desiring to keep her DNA profile private, must conduct her public affairs in a hermetically sealed hazmat suit…. The Majority’s holding means that a person can no longer vote, participate in a jury, or obtain a driver’s license, without opening up his genetic material for state collection and codification. Yet in refusing to hear the case, the U.S. Supreme Court gave its tacit approval for government agents to collect shed DNA, likening it to a person’s fingerprints or the color of their hair, eyes or skin. Whereas fingerprint technology created a watershed moment for police in their ability to “crack” a case, DNA technology is now being hailed by law enforcement agencies as the magic bullet in crime solving. It’s what police like to refer to a “modern fingerprint.” However, unlike a fingerprint, a DNA print reveals everything about “who we are, where we come from, and who we will be.” With such a powerful tool at their disposal, it was inevitable that the government’s collection of DNA would become a slippery slope toward government intrusion. All 50 states now maintain their own DNA databases, although the protocols for collection differ from state to state. Increasingly, many of the data from local databanks are being uploaded to CODIS (Combined DNA Index System), the FBI’s massive DNA database, which has become a de facto way to identify and track the American people from birth to death. Even hospitals have gotten in on the game by taking and storing newborn babies’ DNA, often without their parents’ knowledge or consent. It’s part of the government’s mandatory genetic screening of newborns. However, in many states, the DNA is stored indefinitely. What this means for those being born today is inclusion in a government database that contains intimate information about who they are, their ancestry, and what awaits them in the future, including their inclinations to be followers, leaders or troublemakers. For the rest of us, it’s just a matter of time before the government gets hold of our DNA, either through mandatory programs carried out in connection with law enforcement and corporate America, by warrantlessly accessing our familial DNA shared with genealogical services such as Ancestry and 23andMe, or through the collection of our “shed” or “touch” DNA. All of those fascinating, genealogical ancestral searches that allow you to trace your family tree can also be used against you and those you love. As law professor Elizabeth Joh explains, “When you upload your DNA, you’re potentially becoming a genetic informant on the rest of your family.” While much of the public debate, legislative efforts and legal challenges in recent years have focused on the protocols surrounding when police can legally collect a suspect’s DNA (with or without a search warrant and whether upon arrest or conviction), the question of how to handle “shed” or “touch” DNA has largely slipped through without much debate or opposition. Yet as scientist Leslie A. Pray notes: We all shed DNA, leaving traces of our identity practically everywhere we go. Forensic scientists use DNA left behind on cigarette butts, phones, handles, keyboards, cups, and numerous other objects, not to mention the genetic content found in drops of bodily fluid, like blood and semen. In fact, the garbage you leave for curbside pickup is a potential gold mine of this sort of material. All of this shed or so-called abandoned DNA is free for the taking by local police investigators hoping to crack unsolvable cases. Or, if the future scenario depicted at the beginning of this article is any indication, shed DNA is also free for inclusion in a secret universal DNA databank. What this means is that if you have the misfortune to leave your DNA traces anywhere a crime has been committed, you’ve already got a file somewhere in some state or federal database—albeit it may be a file without a name. As Forensic magazine reports, As officers have become more aware of touch DNA’s potential, they are using it more and more. Unfortunately, some [police] have not been selective enough when they process crime scenes. Instead, they have processed anything and everything at the scene, submitting 150 or more samples for analysis. Even old samples taken from crime scenes and “cold” cases are being unearthed and mined for their DNA profiles. Today, helped along by robotics and automation, DNA processing, analysis and reporting takes far less time and can bring forth all manner of information, right down to a person’s eye color and relatives. Incredibly, one company specializes in creating “mug shots” for police based on DNA samples from unknown “suspects” which are then compared to individuals with similar genetic profiles. If you haven’t yet connected the dots, let me point the way. Having already used surveillance technology to render the entire American populace potential suspects, DNA technology in the hands of government will complete our transition to a suspect society in which we are all merely waiting to be matched up with a crime. No longer can we consider ourselves innocent until proven guilty. Now we are all suspects in a DNA lineup until circumstances and science say otherwise. Of course, there will be those who point to DNA’s positive uses in criminal justice, such as in those instances where it is used to absolve someone on death row of a crime he didn’t commit, and there is no denying its beneficial purposes at times. However, as is the case with body camera footage and every other so-called technology that is hailed as a “check” on government abuses, in order for the average person—especially one convicted of a crime—to request and get access to DNA testing, they first have to embark on a costly, uphill legal battle through red tape and, even then, they are opposed at every turn by a government bureaucracy run by prosecutors, legislatures and law enforcement. What this amounts to is a scenario in which we have little to no defense of against charges of wrongdoing, especially when “convicted” by technology, and even less protection against the government sweeping up our DNA in much the same way it sweeps up our phone calls, emails and text messages. Yet if there are no limits to government officials being able to access your DNA and all that it says about you, then where do you draw the line? As technology makes it ever easier for the government to tap into our thoughts, our memories, our dreams, suddenly the landscape becomes that much more dystopian. With the entire governmental system shifting into a pre-crime mode aimed at detecting and pursuing those who “might” commit a crime before they have an inkling, let alone an opportunity, to do so, it’s not so far-fetched to imagine a scenario in which government agents (FBI, local police, etc.) target potential criminals based on their genetic disposition to be a “troublemaker” or their relationship to past dissenters. Equally disconcerting: if scientists can, using DNA, track salmon across hundreds of square miles of streams and rivers, how easy will it be for government agents to not only know everywhere we’ve been and how long we were at each place but collect our easily shed DNA and add it to the government’s already burgeoning database? As always there will be those voices—well-meaning, certainly—insisting that if you want to save the next girl from being raped, abducted or killed, then we need to give the government all the tools necessary to catch these criminals before they can commit their heinous crimes. If you care for someone, you’re particularly vulnerable to this line of reasoning. Of course we don’t want our wives butchered, our girlfriends raped, our daughters abducted and subjected to all manner of atrocities. But what about those cases in which the technology proved to be wrong, either through human error or tampering? It happens more often than we are told. For example, David Butler spent eight months in prison for a murder he didn’t commit after his DNA was allegedly found on the murder victim and surveillance camera footage placed him in the general area the murder took place. Conveniently, Butler’s DNA was on file after he had voluntarily submitted it during an investigation years earlier into a robbery at his mother’s home. The case seemed cut and dried to everyone but Butler who proclaimed his innocence. Except that the DNA evidence and surveillance footage was wrong: Butler was innocent. Moreover, despite the insistence by government agents that DNA is infallible, New York Times reporter Andrew Pollack makes a clear and convincing case that DNA evidence can, in fact, be fabricated. Israeli scientists “fabricated blood and saliva samples containing DNA from a person other than the donor of the blood and saliva,” stated Pollack. “They also showed that if they had access to a DNA profile in a database, they could construct a sample of DNA to match that profile without obtaining any tissue from that person.” The danger, warns scientist Dan Frumkin, is that crime scenes can be engineered with fabricated DNA. Now if you happen to be the kind of person who trusts the government implicitly and refuses to believe it would ever do anything illegal or immoral, then the prospect of government officials—police, especially—using fake DNA samples to influence the outcome of a case might seem outlandish. Yet as history shows—and as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People—the probability of our government acting in a way that is not only illegal but immoral becomes less a question of “if” and more a question of “when.” ABOUT JOHN W. WHITEHEAD Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His new book Battlefield America: The War on the American People (SelectBooks, 2015) is available online at www.amazon.com. Whitehead can be contacted at [email protected]. Publication Guidelines / Reprint Permission John W. Whitehead’s weekly commentaries are available for publication to newspapers and web publications at no charge. Please contact [email protected] to obtain reprint permission. Image credit: The Anti-Media Uncle Sam Wants Your DNA: The FBI's Diabolical Plan to Create a Nation of Suspects
#DNA #FBI #StopTechnocracy #Biometrics #PoliceState #CivilLiberties #U.S.Constitution #PrivacyRights #UncleSamWantsYourDNA |
Archives
September 2020
Categories
All
|