Bret Kavanuagh could be the most conservative Supreme Court judge since 1934. That is according to Breitbart News purportedly to be a conservative media platform. There are plenty of issues questioning Kavanaugh's ideology and it makes one wonder what Ken Klukowski, the author of that article was thinking. Many may also wonder if the late Andrew Brietbart, founder of Breitbart News, is turning in his grave as his media platform seems to move further away from its original mission. Andrew Breitbart was the true #WalkAway individual in his time. To consider the new Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh as a conservative is questionable. As Benn Swan clearly points out his history suggests that he is not truly a Constitutionalist. As well conservatism was once associated with upholding the values that the Framers designed. Is that now gone? When given a critical historical account of Kavanuagh's history he appears to be far removed from the U.S. Constitution let alone being a Conservative. There are several arguments highlighting that Kavanuagh is more of a serious concern. What was Kavanaugh's Role as Prosecutor in the Office Of Independent Council with the cover up of the the murder of Vince Foster? By: USA Survival Published on Jul 4, 2018 Possible Trump Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh "is part of the ongoing cover-up of the murder of the [Clinton] White House deputy counsel" Vincent Foster. So charges researcher and journalist Hugh Turley. In this explosive video, learn how the Swamp operates in bipartisan fashion to cover up crimes, including murder, and how Deep State agents are deployed to intimidate witnesses and alter evidence. Turley worked with AIM's Reed Irvine and Cliff Kincaid on this case for years, only to face a cover-up from the liberal AND conservative media. KrisAnne Hall, a constitutional educator, speaker, author, attorney, and former prosecutor, provides an Op-Ed in The Western Journal with critical points on Kavanuagh: "In spite of the left’s phony hysteria, Justice Brett Kavanaugh was molded in the image of Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy and voted nearly in lockstep with Judge Merrick Garland, who was nominated to the Supreme Court by former President Barack Obama, in the District Court. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, gave a very detailed defense of why Kavanaugh was liberal enough for her to vote to confirm him, citing Kavanaugh’s judicial record:
A reasoned view of all the issues that have been highlighted by the political narrative proves that his opinions will very likely be no different than Kennedy’s. I therefore don’t see a tremendous change for the Supreme Court. Neil Gorsuch is the justice who probably moved the court more toward the Constitution, as he holds the Constitution as the ultimate standard, where Kavanaugh holds court precedent higher than the Constitution. Kavanaugh’s appointment does not so much move the court as it does stabilize the court as it has existed for many decades — or at least until Ginsberg retires and Trump nominates another justice. It is unfortunate that Kavanaugh’s confirmation was turned into a political tool for votes. We know this is the truth because his presence on the Supreme Court is absolutely no threat to any of the Democrats’ judicial idols. And both sides will now benefit in November from the unnecessary turmoil created by this political theater. After Justice Elena Kagan made a statement regarding the code of civility practiced by Supreme Court justices, the left has been asserting that Kavanaugh will somehow disrupt that tradition. Let’s be clear: The justices are not going to start brawling with one another. That’s just not how the court operates. They hear the arguments, ask their questions and issue their opinions. They are not constantly in the spotlight having to make speeches and triangulate public opinion like elected politicians, so I don’t see some kind of partisan infighting erupting in the Supreme Court. We know from the relationships of past justices that justices are capable of holding very disparate ideologies but behaving in a professional and civil manner. Kavanaugh’s behavior in the Senate hearings, where he was being personally attacked, cannot reasonably be considered a predictor of his behavior in a court hearing where a panel of judges are deciding the legal outcome of cases." KrisAnne Hall's analysis is on point, however, then attempts to give Kavanaugh a 'potential' benefit of doubt as the result of the circus waged against him where he may be inclined to opine more in line with the Constitution. His history suggests otherwise where he is more likely to align with the wrong side of the Constitution. There's no #WalkAway happening here. Just as with the Vince Foster cover up it's possible he was privy to the orchestrated circus that was planned well in advance. What else is there suggesting that Kavanugh is far from being conservative? Personal Liberty did a great write up revealing that Kavanugh is part of the Deep State: "Kavanaugh, while working as legal counsel in the White House of George Bush the lesser, also helped push the PATRIOT Act, which destroyed due process and 4th and 5th Amendments. Kavanaugh’s lawyer for his Senate Judiciary process is Beth Wilkinson, a longtime Democrat lawyer who represented several top aides to Hillary Clinton during the FBI investigation into Clinton’s homebrew server. She is married to David Gregory of CNN. Wilkinson was also on the prosecution team that convicted Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. That implicates her in the coverup of this false flag operation, protecting the FBI and then-U.S. Attorney Eric Holder, who provided the explosives for McVeigh and his partner, Terry Nichols. Personal Liberty's article finishes with this: "That there exists a nebulous group or groups actively working against the wishes of the American people is a difficult concept for a people as conditioned as Americans are to grasp. But anyone telling you there is no Deep State is either blind and ignorant or is lying to you." So true. Time will tell on this new SCOTUS appointment. And it may be prudent not to hold any high hopes on him upholding the U.S. Constitution. Sources: Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed, Possibly Most Conservative Supreme Court Since 1934 www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/10/06/kavanaugh-confirmed-possibly-most-conservative-supreme-court-since-1934/ Judge Brett Kavanaugh and the Murder of Vincent Foster https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3cDgq6tJsM KrisAnne Hall: What Justice Kavanaugh Means for the Future of the Supreme Court https://www.westernjournal.com/krisanne-hall-justice-kavanaugh-means-future-supreme-court/ Kavanaugh hearing confirms the existence of the Deep State https://personalliberty.com/kavanaugh-hearing-confirms-the-existence-of-the-deep-state/ Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed, Possibly Most Conservative Supreme Court Since 1934. Really? #BretKavanugh #JudgeKavanaugh #VincentFosterCoverUp #VincentFoster #PatriotAct #DeepState #Obamacare #4thAmendment #5thAmendment #SCOTUS #WalkAway
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
September 2020
Categories
All
|