Listen to this interview very carefully. Then please share it. Thoughts and prayers to all affected by Hurricane Michael. American Intelligence Media Published on Oct 12, 2018 Douglas Gabriel introduces MICHAEL THOMAS, the founder and editor of two of the independent media's most substantive news sites - State of the Nation and The Millennium Report. As a resident of Florida, a first-hand eye witness of the devastation of Hurricane Michael, and a citizen journalist who has followed the progress of weather being weaponized against citizens, Michael is outraged at what is happening in Florida's panhandle just as the midterms are around the corner. Weather Terrorism Obliterates MAGA Panhandle
#WeatherTerrorism #GeorgeSoros #FloridaElection #ElectionMeddling #FloridaGovernorElection #StateOfTheNation #HurricaneMichael #Hurricane #Micahael #WeatherWarfare #WeatherModification #HurricaneSteering #ControllingTheWeather2025 #Agenda21 #Agenda2030 #5G #SkyNet #HAARP #MicrowavePulse #NEXRAD #Geoengineering
0 Comments
Bret Kavanuagh could be the most conservative Supreme Court judge since 1934. That is according to Breitbart News purportedly to be a conservative media platform. There are plenty of issues questioning Kavanaugh's ideology and it makes one wonder what Ken Klukowski, the author of that article was thinking. Many may also wonder if the late Andrew Brietbart, founder of Breitbart News, is turning in his grave as his media platform seems to move further away from its original mission. Andrew Breitbart was the true #WalkAway individual in his time. To consider the new Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh as a conservative is questionable. As Benn Swan clearly points out his history suggests that he is not truly a Constitutionalist. As well conservatism was once associated with upholding the values that the Framers designed. Is that now gone? When given a critical historical account of Kavanuagh's history he appears to be far removed from the U.S. Constitution let alone being a Conservative. There are several arguments highlighting that Kavanuagh is more of a serious concern. What was Kavanaugh's Role as Prosecutor in the Office Of Independent Council with the cover up of the the murder of Vince Foster? By: USA Survival Published on Jul 4, 2018 Possible Trump Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh "is part of the ongoing cover-up of the murder of the [Clinton] White House deputy counsel" Vincent Foster. So charges researcher and journalist Hugh Turley. In this explosive video, learn how the Swamp operates in bipartisan fashion to cover up crimes, including murder, and how Deep State agents are deployed to intimidate witnesses and alter evidence. Turley worked with AIM's Reed Irvine and Cliff Kincaid on this case for years, only to face a cover-up from the liberal AND conservative media. KrisAnne Hall, a constitutional educator, speaker, author, attorney, and former prosecutor, provides an Op-Ed in The Western Journal with critical points on Kavanuagh: "In spite of the left’s phony hysteria, Justice Brett Kavanaugh was molded in the image of Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy and voted nearly in lockstep with Judge Merrick Garland, who was nominated to the Supreme Court by former President Barack Obama, in the District Court. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, gave a very detailed defense of why Kavanaugh was liberal enough for her to vote to confirm him, citing Kavanaugh’s judicial record:
A reasoned view of all the issues that have been highlighted by the political narrative proves that his opinions will very likely be no different than Kennedy’s. I therefore don’t see a tremendous change for the Supreme Court. Neil Gorsuch is the justice who probably moved the court more toward the Constitution, as he holds the Constitution as the ultimate standard, where Kavanaugh holds court precedent higher than the Constitution. Kavanaugh’s appointment does not so much move the court as it does stabilize the court as it has existed for many decades — or at least until Ginsberg retires and Trump nominates another justice. It is unfortunate that Kavanaugh’s confirmation was turned into a political tool for votes. We know this is the truth because his presence on the Supreme Court is absolutely no threat to any of the Democrats’ judicial idols. And both sides will now benefit in November from the unnecessary turmoil created by this political theater. After Justice Elena Kagan made a statement regarding the code of civility practiced by Supreme Court justices, the left has been asserting that Kavanaugh will somehow disrupt that tradition. Let’s be clear: The justices are not going to start brawling with one another. That’s just not how the court operates. They hear the arguments, ask their questions and issue their opinions. They are not constantly in the spotlight having to make speeches and triangulate public opinion like elected politicians, so I don’t see some kind of partisan infighting erupting in the Supreme Court. We know from the relationships of past justices that justices are capable of holding very disparate ideologies but behaving in a professional and civil manner. Kavanaugh’s behavior in the Senate hearings, where he was being personally attacked, cannot reasonably be considered a predictor of his behavior in a court hearing where a panel of judges are deciding the legal outcome of cases." KrisAnne Hall's analysis is on point, however, then attempts to give Kavanaugh a 'potential' benefit of doubt as the result of the circus waged against him where he may be inclined to opine more in line with the Constitution. His history suggests otherwise where he is more likely to align with the wrong side of the Constitution. There's no #WalkAway happening here. Just as with the Vince Foster cover up it's possible he was privy to the orchestrated circus that was planned well in advance. What else is there suggesting that Kavanugh is far from being conservative? Personal Liberty did a great write up revealing that Kavanugh is part of the Deep State: "Kavanaugh, while working as legal counsel in the White House of George Bush the lesser, also helped push the PATRIOT Act, which destroyed due process and 4th and 5th Amendments. Kavanaugh’s lawyer for his Senate Judiciary process is Beth Wilkinson, a longtime Democrat lawyer who represented several top aides to Hillary Clinton during the FBI investigation into Clinton’s homebrew server. She is married to David Gregory of CNN. Wilkinson was also on the prosecution team that convicted Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. That implicates her in the coverup of this false flag operation, protecting the FBI and then-U.S. Attorney Eric Holder, who provided the explosives for McVeigh and his partner, Terry Nichols. Personal Liberty's article finishes with this: "That there exists a nebulous group or groups actively working against the wishes of the American people is a difficult concept for a people as conditioned as Americans are to grasp. But anyone telling you there is no Deep State is either blind and ignorant or is lying to you." So true. Time will tell on this new SCOTUS appointment. And it may be prudent not to hold any high hopes on him upholding the U.S. Constitution. Sources: Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed, Possibly Most Conservative Supreme Court Since 1934 www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/10/06/kavanaugh-confirmed-possibly-most-conservative-supreme-court-since-1934/ Judge Brett Kavanaugh and the Murder of Vincent Foster https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3cDgq6tJsM KrisAnne Hall: What Justice Kavanaugh Means for the Future of the Supreme Court https://www.westernjournal.com/krisanne-hall-justice-kavanaugh-means-future-supreme-court/ Kavanaugh hearing confirms the existence of the Deep State https://personalliberty.com/kavanaugh-hearing-confirms-the-existence-of-the-deep-state/ Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed, Possibly Most Conservative Supreme Court Since 1934. Really? #BretKavanugh #JudgeKavanaugh #VincentFosterCoverUp #VincentFoster #PatriotAct #DeepState #Obamacare #4thAmendment #5thAmendment #SCOTUS #WalkAway Remembering John McCain for Who He Really Was |
| John McCain Lied To Us All on 'Repeal and Replace' By: John Bouchell - JohnnyBravo Published on Aug 29, 2018 'You Lied to Us All. This is your legacy.' JB |
That is how much theft Sen. John McCain tried to help cover up from his friend and benefactor Charles Keating who had greased McCain and other senators with more than $1 million in political contributions. But that did not include the family vacations McCain’s family took with the Keating’s.
And the campaign cash.
And the private jets.
And whatever side deals, property and cash these senators quietly scored.
So while everyone in D.C. now is offering tributes to John McCain — no one seems to remember the time he tried to make sure his pal could rip off billions from hard-working Americans who deposited their money in Lincoln Savings and Loan. Americans who lost their cash — and taxpayers who were on the hook for guaranteeing that money.
More:
truepundit.com/john-mccain-took-part-of-1-million-in-cash-lavish-vacations-private-jets-from-conman-then-lobbied-feds-to-cover-up-3-4-billion-crook-ripped-off-from-americans/
"McCain likes to illustrate his moral fibre by referring to his five years as a prisoner-of-war in Vietnam. And to demonstrate his commitment to family values, the 71-year-old former US Navy pilot pays warm tribute to his beautiful blonde wife, Cindy, with whom he has four children.
But there is another Mrs McCain who casts a ghostly shadow over the Senator’s presidential campaign. She is seldom seen and rarely written about, despite being mother to McCain’s three eldest children.
And yet, had events turned out differently, it would be she, rather than Cindy, who would be vying to be First Lady. She is McCain’s first wife, Carol, who was a famous beauty and a successful swimwear model when they married in 1965.
She was the woman McCain dreamed of during his long incarceration and torture in Vietnam’s infamous ‘Hanoi Hilton’ prison and the woman who faithfully stayed at home looking after the children and waiting anxiously for news.
But when McCain returned to America in 1973 to a fanfare of publicity and a handshake from Richard Nixon, he discovered his wife had been disfigured in a terrible car crash three years earlier. Her car had skidded on icy roads into a telegraph pole on Christmas Eve, 1969. Her pelvis and one arm were shattered by the impact and she suffered massive internal injuries.
When Carol was discharged from hospital after six months of life-saving surgery, the prognosis was bleak. In order to save her legs, surgeons had been forced to cut away huge sections of shattered bone, taking with it her tall, willowy figure. She was confined to a wheelchair and was forced to use a catheter.
Through sheer hard work, Carol learned to walk again. But when John McCain came home from Vietnam, she had gained a lot of weight and bore little resemblance to her old self.
Today, she stands at just 5ft4in and still walks awkwardly, with a pronounced limp. Her body is held together by screws and metal plates and, at 70, her face is worn by wrinkles that speak of decades of silent suffering.
For nearly 30 years, Carol has maintained a dignified silence about the accident, McCain and their divorce. But last week at the bungalow where she now lives at Virginia Beach, a faded seaside resort 200 miles south of Washington, she told The Mail on Sunday how McCain divorced her in 1980 and married Cindy, 18 years his junior and the heir to an Arizona brewing fortune, just one month later."
Source:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024927/The-wife-John-McCain-callously-left-behind.html
HighImpactVlogs
Published on Sep 2, 2018
#JohnMcCainDead #TraitorMcCain #WarMongerMcCain #RINOMcCain #SongbirdMcCain #RepealandReplace
The segment produced by Paul Joseph Watson is well done and may actually be a bit of a mind blower for many as the script is exactly the same across the American news stations to include the local one here in the Capital District of New York State.
Shame, shame. Unless content is about strictly local news stories such as the annual Saratoga Racing in August nothing else is otherwise original or likely not even true.
To be fair, Liz Bishop has proven to have done excellent reporting in the past. However, things have changed as the stations ceased providing original and more importantly objective content be it local or national. Liz Bishop obviously was reading off a teleprompter in a nationwide unified propaganda effort to control and shape your 'collective' mind.
And that folks, is what fake news looks like
By the way Liz, the United States is NOT a democracy. The United States of America is a Constitutional Republic. Hopefully you will take the opportunity to admit to your regrettable mistake and openly sate the correction on the air.
#FakeNews #Propaganda #LizBishop #CBS6Albany-WRGB
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”
Benjamin Franklin
“Last week my Assembly Colleagues and I helped pass several measures to address the issue of gun violence across our state. While I voted in favor of bills that would ban bump stocks and increase wait times for gun buyers flagged as needing more time to vet through mandatory background checks, I strongly believe that we must turn our focus to improving school safety rather than only having a dialogue about gun control. We can all agree that we want our students and staff members to be safe when they go to school, and in order to do that we must bring together experienced experts to make recommendations and move forward with potentially life saving measures for New Yorkers.”
Updating her constituents is certainly appreciated. However, Assemblywoman Mary Beth Walsh voted on criteria that suggest ignorance both on firearms and trends on violent crime in New York where one can only wonder why a yes vote would fly to begin with. Bringing in experts is also concerning as the anti-gun Democrats will make sure to find only those so-called experts intended to provide false and incorrect information. Transparency for those on a list for whom the ‘experienced experts’ will be is expected with alternative sources open to constituent’s advice, if necessary.
Taken from Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie’s state website:
“The legislative package includes measures that would prevent individuals determined to be a danger to themselves or others from possessing or purchasing firearms, establish a longer waiting period before delivery of a purchased firearm to a person who has not cleared a background check and ban devices that turn legal firearms into machines guns, commonly referred to as "bump stocks."
Bump Stocks do NOT turn firearms into machine guns. His claim is false and misleading, intentionally or not, to all legislatures and to the public. It appears that there is a serious issue where legislatures are not appropriately educated on firearms where even the ATF does not recognize the Assembly Speaker’s claim that bump stocks turns semiautomatics into machine guns:
“In a letter dated October 12, the ATF Association informed lawmakers that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) approved bump stocks because they do not turn a semiautomatic rifle into “a machine gun.”
The ATF Association letter was written by the group’s president, Michael Bouchard, who said:
The National Firearms Act of 1934, Title 26 U.S.C. 5845(b) defines a “machine gun” as any combination of parts designed and intended for use in converting a weapon to shoot automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. ATF also holds that any item that can cause a firearm to fire more than one shot by the single function of the trigger is also regulated as a machine gun.
The Las Vegas killer used a “bump slide” accessory that attaches to the stock of a semi-automatic rifle and enhances the rate at which the shooter can pull the trigger on the firearm. This increases the rate of fire close to that of an actual machine gun. However, under the current law, it does not make it a machine gun.
A semiautomatic fires one round–and only one round–each time the trigger is pulled. An automatic fires continuously with one pull of the trigger. A bump stock allows a trigger to be pulled quickly–thus allowing the gun owner to mimic automatic fire in short bursts–but he is never firing more than one round per each pull of the trigger.” 1
The ignorance that Assembly Speaker Heastie is showing is troubling.
What was the opening statement on Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie’s state website ?
“Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie today announced the Assembly plans to pass legislation to help prevent and reduce gun violence in New York. “
Reduce? So what are the stats for New York?
Released for data up through 2016
4.4 per 100,000 for New York
Highest Alaska 23.3
Lowest Massachusetts 3.4
National Average 11.8
These stats were NOT all violent related.
New York ranks the third lowest in gun deaths. See ‘Notes’ for sources and additional information.
Let’s dig into this a little further. According the NYS Crime Report Final Data for 2016 published September 2017, here’s what we find:
Page 4 Referencing “Trends in Violent Crimes by Firearm 2015-2016”, Regional Trends:
“Homicides increased (+1.6%), driven exclusively by a 10.2 percent increase (293 vs. 266) in homicides reported in the 57 counties outside of New York City. Homicides in the five boroughs decreased 4.8 percent (335 vs. 352). See Appendices 1 and 2 for more details.
Despite the statewide increase, there were significantly fewer homicides when comparing 2007 to 2016: 808 vs. 628, a decrease of 22.3 percent.
Homicides by firearm showed a similar trend, declining 27 percent.
The number of non firearm related homicides also decreased (14.4%) when comparing 2007 to 2016, but there was a notable increase between 2015 and 2016 (+13.5%). It is important to note, however, that non firearm related homicides reached an all time low in 2015, with 230 reported.”
Message to all New York State Assembly – Did you miss this publication or ignore it? Calling for reduction in gun related violence is deceiving and disingenuous, deliberately or not, to the constituents of New York when it is already occurring in a state ranking as the third or fourth lowest along with declining rates on recent trending years in 50 states for gun violence.
The measures on several of these bills are suggest deception, ignorance and total lack of regard to the unalienable 2nd Amendment rights by attempting to pass laws on false premises. This is unacceptable.
Although Assemblywoman Walsh does suggest not limiting the debate to only guns we see capitulating on bills that are unconstitutional, based on incorrect claims while incrementally removing rights of law abiding citizens which again, is unacceptable.
Ignorance being a pervasive issue across the United States where an excellent commentary published March 9, 2018 in the Washington Examiner addresses this very problem:
“It’s the ignorance of lawmakers, gun control activists, and media commentators that is inexcusable and insulting. Understanding the issue is the bare minimum required of their respective professions. Yet, so many simply refuse to learn the topic.”
Consider the event that occurred in Pennsylvania where a student went on a rampage injuring 22, many seriously. Has anyone heard or even recall hearing about it? It occurred close to four years ago. Although it did make the news there wasn’t much attention given post the event and the story ‘quickly’ faded away. Why is that? Those who pay close and objective attention understand that it doesn’t fit the anti-gun agenda’s narrative. The choice of weapon was a knife. The student was arrested, charged as an adult and the case was closed as far as the media and the rest were concerned.
The case doesn’t close for this obviously troubled student, victims and families. What were the underlying causes to begin with? Many will ponder a very common denominator of possibly being on anti-psychotic drugs.
However, if he was or not on prescribed medications there is often another common anomaly that is revealed with these types of events:
“The attacker “had the same expression on his face that he has every day, which was the freakiest part,” Moore said. “He wasn’t saying anything. He didn’t have any anger on his face. It was just a blank expression.”
What is going on? There are so many points to consider.
If keeping children safe is so critical why are these children subjected to this type of psychological conditioning and indoctrination whether or not it is line with family or individual values be it from any other source to include the government schools and the state government?
What right did the schools have to sanction this?
Isn't this child abuse? Using children for political gain was also used by Hitler, Mao and Castro.
- They’re victims of broken families primarily as a result of social engineering.
- They are deliberately taught to be confused about sense of self. They are forced into government indoctrination centers called schools and forced to be spoon sped information rather to ever develop true critical thought (Common Core). They are also taught in a manner only to confuse their minds and only memorize for tests. The subject matter is dubious at best as it is totally different to the curriculum prior to the 2009’s scheme of Common Core’s implementation.
- Children are given electronic devices, surrounding by Wi-Fi that are proven to adversely change their brains, create cancer, destroy their reproductive organs such as from the radiation of lap top devices and have access to video games in order to desensitize to otherwise unthinkable crimes and also have easy access to pornography at a very young age. The real mind blower is how so many adults, guardians and parents let alone the government and their schools are seemingly OK with this. Let’s not use the recent reprehensible event as an example where Facebook asks users if showing pedophile pictures is OK.
- Today’s children are in severe lack of nutrition in spite of the common belief and are given genetically modified, nutrient deprived foods proven to destroy gut health and also consume the pesticide, insecticide and glyphosate drenched foods causing many skyrocketing illnesses to include cancer rarely seen at these ages only 10-20 years ago.
- If they manage to make it out of K-12 what may be seemingly unscathed so far where many at an increasing rate eventually enter into early onset Alzheimer’s by their 40’s due to high heavy metal overload, particularly mercury proven to cause dementia be it from the amalgam fillings with mercury, the mercury contaminated fish, and last but not least the unbelievably ‘forced’ called mandated 72+ vaccinations with many containing neurotoxins such as mercury and aluminum, let alone a plethora of other serious toxins and pathogens and last but not least ‘aborted’ fetal cells.
- If these poor kids show any degree of behavior previously coined as normal they’re now a problem and often diagnosed often by non-medical school staff as such with the often immediate pressure for a permanent brain destroying pharmaceutical fix to make them docile and servile. Forget the real underlying cause, re-read points for clues, and where the government schools typically receive monetary kickbacks for a given number of children per year that they are rewarded for getting them on mind destroying anti-psychotic drugs.
- Oh, let’s not forget the neurotoxin, IQ lowering, bone cancer causing, pineal gland calcifier fluoride that’s in bottled water, toothpastes, many foods, baby formulas, many pharmaceutical drugs and most regrettably municipal water. Another drug that serves to pacify.
The surface was only scratched on these points. And one can only wonder why this poor child had a ‘blank stare’ at the 2014 incident. The insane everyday environment that he and all children are subjected to and being harmed from are right in front of all of you and all either fail/refuse to see it or are willingly partaking in, be it the ideology, accepting corporate campaign donations and promising their agenda’s, unconstituitonal federal program funding such as Common Core, pressure from within in order to tow the party line or state line and etcetera resulting in the destruction of these children. This is what they need to be protected from instead.
Forget about all of that. Let’s focus on gun violence and that affects 0.004 percent of the New York population, where although every life counts pales in comparison to the genocide occurring at Planned Parenthood where New York ranks first on totals and pass additional unconstitutional laws that punish law abiding citizens instead.
And really, forget the kids. They’re without question desperate for the sound guidance, wisdom and leadership that have been lost and now they are only lost souls. Of course, let’s forget that part. They’re only important as pawns in the game for political agendas in order to strip away more rights at least here in the state of New York government.
Notes
“Age-adjusted rates per 100,000 U.S. standard population. Rates for the United States and each state are based on populations enumerated in the 2010 census as of July 1, 2013. Since death rates are affected by the population composition of a given area, age-adjusted death rates should be used for comparisons between areas because they control for differences in population composition.
Causes of death attributable to firearm mortality include ICD-10 Codes W32-W34, Accidental discharge of firearm; Codes X72-X74, Intentional self-harm by firearm; X93-X95, Assault by firearm; Y22-Y24, Firearm discharge, undetermined intent; and Y35.0, Legal intervention involving firearm discharge. Deaths from injury by firearms exclude deaths due to explosives and other causes indirectly related to firearms.”
Sources
“Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Underlying Cause of Death 1999-2016 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released 2017. Data are from the Multiple Cause of Death Files, 1999-2016, as compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program. Accessed at http://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html on February 26, 2018.”
KKF Firearms Death Rate per 100,000
Additional Sources:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/no-one-would-accept-in-any-other-national-discussion-the-level-of-ignorance-seen-in-the-gun-debate
https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/firearms-death-rate-per-100000/?activeTab=map¤tTimeframe=0&selectedDistributions=firearms-death-rate-per-100000&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D
Mary Beth Walsh NY (R) 112th District Breaks 2016 Campaign Promise
#GunControl #GunViolence #MBWalsh112 #AssemblyNY #GovernorAndrewCuomo #BumpStocks @MBWalsh112 #CommonCore #PlannedParenthood #Vaccines #JamesTedisco
https://www.budget.ny.gov/pubs/archive/fy19/exec/fy19approps/Local.pdf
The Lancet Neurology, Volume 13, Issue 3, in the March 2014 edition, by authors Dr. Phillippe Grandjean and Philip J. Landrigan, MD has officially classified fluoride as a neurotoxin, in the same category as arsenic, lead and mercury.
“A federal court has denied an attempt by the Environmental Protection Agency to dismiss a lawsuit seeking to ban the use of fluoride under the Toxic Substances Control Act.”
“In a victory for water fluoridation opponents, a judge in the Northern District of California has denied a motion by the Environmental Protection Agency that sought to limit the information available to the court while making their decision on whether or not to ban water fluoridation. The lawsuit was brought forth by Food and Water Watch Inc. and a coalition of health organizations and individuals concerned about fluoride. Under section 21 of The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) citizens are allowed to petition the EPA to regulate or ban individual chemicals. Food and Water Watch filed the lawsuit after the EPA rejected a citizen petition calling for the EPA to ban the addition of fluoride chemicals to the drinking water supply.”
Source: Court Decision Could Lead to EPA Banning Water Fluoridation Published March 3, 2018
It is critical to contact your New York State legislatures to remove the fluoridation funding form the budget!
Sample contact for letter:
Referencing pages 531-532 notes where ten million is to be allocated for fluoridation purposes. As research has proven as well the classification that fluoride is a drug requiring consent for consumption along with the very serious health impacts from any fluoride applicaitons it is requested that this budget allocation be removed. A brief summary below reinforces the need to ban this dangerous neurotoxin. Water utilities utilizing this additive or not removing from agriculture runoff are poisoning their customers!
The Lancet Neurology, Volume 13, Issue 3, in the March 2014 edition has officially classified fluoride as a neurotoxin.
A new development where a federal court in the Northern District of California has denied an attempt by the Environmental Protection Agency to dismiss a lawsuit seeking to ban the use of fluoride under the Toxic Substances Control Act where it may force the EPA to ban water fluoridation altogether. Source: Court Decision Could Lead to EPA Banning Water Fluoridation Published March 3, 2018
In addition to Fluoride being classified as a neurotoxin it has also already been proven to lower IQ in children, adversely impact thyroid function, may lead to urinary stone disease, contribute to ADHD and also contribute to fluorosis of the developing teeth in children. Please review the link for additional adverse health impact information: https://www.activistpost.com/2018/03/court-decision-epa-banning-water-fluoridation.html
Rather than funding for fluoridation purposes, banning fluoridation altogether is the required alternative. It is strongly requested the funding for any fluoridation purposes be fully removed.
Thank You,
https://www.nysenate.gov/registration/nojs/form/start/find-my-senator
Find your New York assembly members here:
http://nyassembly.gov/mem/
For grants to counties, cities, towns or
60
villages that own their public water
61
system and the water supply for such
62
system for the purpose of providing
1
assistance towards the costs of installa-
2
tion, including but not limited to techni-
3
cal and administrative costs associated
4
with planning, design and construction,
5
and start-up of fluoridation systems, and
6
repair or upgrading of fluoridation equip-
7
ment for such public water systems.
8
Notwithstanding any provision of law to the
9
contrary, the portion of this appropri-
10
ation covering fiscal year 2018-19 shall
11
supersede and replace any duplicative (i)
12
reappropriation for this item covering
13
fiscal year 2018-19, and (ii) appropri-
14
ation for this item covering fiscal year
15
2018-19 set forth in chapter 53 of the
16
laws of 2017 (26932) ..................... 10,000,000
@JamesTedisco @MBWalsh112 @NYSenate @AssemblyNY #NYSenate #AssemblyNY #NoFluoride #FluorideKills
Contact New York State Sen. Parker to voice support for the bill 7214 and suggest amendments [to include similar as below]. Call members of the New York Senate Energy and Telecommunications Committee to help get, what is still a critically important bill, out of committee.
By Catherine J. Frompovich
January 25, 2017
You know it just had to happen! Some scientifically-hip legislator in one of the 50 United States finally decided to introduce a bill to protect his constituents’ Constitutional rights guaranteed by both state and federal Constitutions, plus delineated the factual, independent--not consensus—science that radiofrequencies (RFs) from AMI Smart Meters damage health and “The OCC [Oklahoma Corporation Commission] is to understand by this legislation that they work for the consumers and citizens of the State of Oklahoma and not the utility”! [1]
Applause, applause, applause and many kudos to Oklahoma State House of Representatives legislator Dale Derby for introducing House Bill 2872 that would provide many legislative means of relief for utility consumers who reject AMI Smart Meters, including removal at no cost to consumers, plus many more exemplary legislative provisions sorely needed by those individuals who are compromised by and suffer with electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) or idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI).
Oklahoma House Bill 2872 is the most comprehensive bill I’ve seen to date dealing with the horrendous draconian totalitarian AMI Smart Meter implementation against supposedly free people’s rights and/or objections to causing them problems and/or damaged health!
The Oklahoma bill is 12 pages in length, which I encourage everyone to study and also to ask your respective states’ Capitol legislators to introduce to provide the sorely-needed relief that has not been forthcoming from either harassing utility companies or lax and/or lackey state utility commissions.
The bill’s language is nothing short of all encompassing, I think, considering the totality of issues involved. It cites independent studies confirming health harms from AMI Smart Meter radiation; defines what an electromechanical analog meter and wireless meters are, i.e., “AMR, ERT, smart, AMI and Comprehensive Advanced Metering Plan (CAMP)”; plus discusses and delineates “equivalent technology, cell phone, WiFi, Ratepayer, Opt-in, and Opt-out.”
Oklahoma HB 2872 provides for the following:
1 – A choice of the type of utility meters to be installed and operated on their places of residence, property or business; among the choices offered shall be the installation or ongoing operation of a nontransmitting electromechanical analog meter;
2 – The ability to retain and operate an electromechanic alanalog [sic] meter on an ongoing basis at no cost; and
3 – The right to replacement of a wireless meter with a nontransmitting electromechanical meter at no cost.
C. The utility companies in Oklahoma shall be required to obtain the ratepayer’s written consent, i.e. opt-in or opt-out:
1 – Before installing wireless meters or equivalent technology on the ratepayer’s property; and
2 – Before altering the functionality of said meters.
D. The utility companies shall provide written notice to ratepayers within ninety (90) days of the effective date of this act for the purpose of informing said ratepayers if wireless meters have been installed on their properties. [….]
E. Utility companies by this section of law shall be:
1 – Prohibited from shutting off service to a ratepayer based on the ratepayer’s utility usage or on the ratepayer having electromechanical analog meters;
2 – Prohibited from imposing any disincentive on a ratepayer for not consenting to the installation or use of wireless meters;
3 – Required to notify ratepayers in writing that the installation and use of wireless meters are not mandated by state or federal law and are not permitted without the ratepayer’s consent;
Additionally, the bill provides that the OCC
- Shall establish an absolute state-wide moratorium on the deployment of smart meter AMI (advanced metering infrastructure), metering equipment that uses microwave technology to communicate information from the consumer to the utility, whether it is an electric utility or other. Such moratorium to remain in place until released by action of the State Legislature rescinding the requirements of this paragraph;
- Shall ensure that all utility and phone service providers properly notice [sic] all customers of potential health hazards of any and all of their services and allow the customer to opt-out or modify services if desired by the customer;
How about these provisions!
The OCC shall exercise its constitutional duty to independently review the safety of devices, such as smart meters, ….
5 – The OCC shall also promulgate rules that shall make Oklahoma permanently an opt-in state for any kind of smart meter application.
And here’s the pièce de résistance, which refers to an “Electric Usage Data Protection Act” to be developed by the OCC to
… remove the capability of the utility to have access to any information from the consumer except for what is necessary, in calculating gross consumption of the utilities services, to bill for the amount of the utility used by the consumer. The revised language is to make it clear that the consumer, not the utility, owns consumer information and any information that is unnecessary for billing may be released only for good and valuable consideration received by the consumer from the utility through a written agreement. Additionally, the utility may not sell the information, whether it identifies the consumer or not, nor may it aggregate the information to sell it, unless each individual consumer owner has given permission in writing to the utility. [CJF emphasis]
There is something ‘missing’ from this exemplary bill, in my opinion.
There is no mention of--nor does it address—the connection(s) between the fast-approaching and dramatically health-dangerous 5G broadband, which will require small cell towers placed every 300 feet that probably will have definite tie ins to AMI Smart Meters, the “key feedback loop” for the Internet of Things (IoT) reporting system for personal in-home data sharing, the concerns about which were discussed and neutralized in HB 2872.
More....
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/01/oklahomas-exemplary-ami-smart-meters-removal-consumer-protection-bill-model-states-follow.html?winst=1517333615545&of=0
However
What would FEPA do? Of course! Who would have guessed?
More NON-CONSENTUAL surveillance of American Citizens!
Be it Smart Growth, Smart Grid, GPS tracking, Technology in Cars Tracking Your Every Move, naming several, where all of this is growing exponentially taking the American Citizens at lightning speed into a technocratic dictatorship. It’s time to wake up and take a stand against this.
| Published January 12, 2018 Red Kudzu Excerpt from the commentary: “Fundamental problem on the data privacy end is that collecting and holding and sharing massive amounts of data on free born American citizens is not something that a free society should be doing. That is something that totalitarian societies like China do. This is not something the United States of America does. The scheme would have an intimidating effect on citizens because if a citizen doesn’t know what the government has on him that is going to affect his behavior. When especially he knows that all this data from different agencies would be sharing the data and repurposing it beyond the purposes for which he turned it over. So this is a step in a very dangerous direction for a free society.” Red Kudzu List of U.S. Senate to contact and to oppose FEPA: Members of the committee: Johnson, Ron (WI) – Chairman, McCain, John (AZ) Portman, Rob (OH) Paul, Rand (KY) Lankford, James (OK) Enzi, Michael B. (WY) Hoeven, John (ND) Daines, Steve (MT) McCaskill, Claire (MO), - Ranking Member Carper, Thomas R. (DE) Heitkamp, Heidi (ND) Peters, Gary C. (MI) Hassan, Margaret Wood (NH) Harris, Kamala D. (CA) Jones, Doug (AL) Contact members of the U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/about Tell them to OPPOSE H.R. 4174 and S 2046 Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr14ZmrQGu0 |
Have the Town Board and the Town Supervisor’s initiatives for the past eight years taken Glenville in the right direction be it fiscally and commercially along with adding benefits such as park improvements? Yes. And thank you Supervisor Koetzle for taking Glenville out of the near crap hole the town was precariously heading into prior.
However, not all is perfect and it is critical to take all of the Town Board to task when necessary.
Really, no surprise that the Town of Glenville Comprehensive Plan updated October 2017 was so easily passed. This plan is, of course, all about improvements be it long or short term. The plan does contain some very sensible, well thought out and well planned goals along with some practical objectives. However, it does have those 'lovely' platitudes. And it is riddled with well hidden Agenda 21/2030 driven goals (who advised those planners when drafting where one can only wonder).
If anyone is not familiar with the Agenda 21/2030 scheme it is imperative to get familiarized and educated NOW! There are several resources to bring all up to speed. An excellent place to start is Technocracy News & Trends.
There have been minimal attempts to educate the board by residents several years ago where sadly all simply ignored the warnings. In summary this scheme will undermine every right you ‘think’ you have and take full control over every aspect of your life. The scheme includes ‘feel good’ ideas, plans and platitudes to get you hooked into thinking all are great. It is NOT. It is a global scheme affecting all countries such as the USA where is filters down to state then to local levels such as town governments for the most efficient implementation. Once one truly understands this scheme they will also understand how diabolical it really is. Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) and Public-Private Partnerships such as the NY Smart Grid are working alongside towns to direct what will get accomplished and its timing. Get educated on this!
Agenda 21/2030 was necessary for a brief review as the theme for Smart Growth is directly associated.
Automatic Read Water Meters (AMR) is part of the Smart Growth agenda. Once all infrastructure is fully in place that would include the necessary software and devices to capture the constant emitting of RF signals your privacy rights under the 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution will be completely stripped as these signals will document 24/7 of water used by all residents with these AMR devices.
Why would anyone consider this type of surveillance even remotely necessary? The answer is To Control You. Does the Town Board understand this? Who knows? What is obvious is that the song and dance about cutting costs only applies to the Town on this matter.
At 21:00 minutes in the You Tube link that is provided Koetzle discusses about the significant investments that ‘help us’ cut costs. Who is “us”? When on page 100 of the Town’s New Comprehensive Plan updated October 2017 where it includes that the billing structure for the water bills will change how does that equate in helping the residents? Just wait. 2018 will still be one bill. However, here comes those capital investments that Koetzle discusses where, mark, my words, it will be changed to a higher billing frequency of more than once per year and that cost will go up. Somebody is paying for all of that. Who might that be?
At the 20:07 minute mark in the You Tube link provided Koetzle discusses about the cleanup of environmental hazards that have been completed providing specifics and expresses his concerns about matters “that threaten the health of our residents”.
Good to hear that. However, if that is the case why is the Town attempting to force AMR Water Meters into the Glenville residents’ homes when it’s now established radio frequencies harm health? Look up Agenda 21/2030 for the answer. They think it’s only about efficiency or possibly they know the hidden agendas and otherwise spew that it’s about efficiency in running the Town and are also very likely advised (by NGOs and others) how to tell the residents otherwise.
Along with the health destructive causes from Electric Utility Smart Meters, Cell Phones, Wi-Fi and Cell Towers to name the more obvious, AMR Water Meters are an additional health hazard on every resident. Along with the invasion of privacy that is compromised awareness is growing in efforts to protect each and every individual’s privacy. And the industries involved are withholding what is already known.
Two points to be made to verify and prove these concerns are as follows:
- On October 1, 2017, the International Classification of Diseases added a new Diagnostic Code for Exposure to Radio Frequencies (RF) as a legitimate and billable Health Condition. Previously, there was a diagnostic code for non-ionizing radiation only.
Exposure to Radio Frequencies is now recognized as causing harm.
Go to the ICD’s website: http://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/V00-Y99/W85-W99/W90-/W90.0XXA
- A bill introduced on January 3rd by New York Sen. Kevin Parker (D) would allow customers to opt out of installing Smart meter’ technology. Although NY Senate Bill SO7214 focuses more towards electric and gas utilities it does include radio frequency technology. And this does now prove that even many in the legislature in New York State are now recognizing that these technologies are a problem and need to allow anyone to opt out. And that would include without penalty or threats by the commission except for a potential fee for removal.
All of these technologies are spying devices and violates your constitutional rights.
To have the option to opt out without penalties to threats is paramount.
The text of this bill can reviewed here: https://legiscan.com/NY/bill/S07214/2017
At 28:14 minutes Koetzle then discusses the plan for amending zoning and codes “in accordance with the Town Comprehensive Plan". And it will be hard work of ‘synching our code with the plan’. As AMR Water Meters are frequently referenced in the plan does this mean that a code ‘mandating’ the installation of an AMR Water Meter having radio frequency technology now known to cause medical harm will be one of them? If so, isn’t that ‘willful harm’ and as all board members are sworn in oath to the Constitution. Therefore, wouldn’t that now be consider as treason? How about the violation of the 4th Amendment rights?
Thus a message going to the Town Supervisor, Commissioner of Public Works and the Town Board where ‘thank you’ for what has been truly positive. However, is the position for Smart Growth going to remove the rights of the citizens along with without any redress as the result in order to move full speed ahead on this agenda? And that is exactly what Agenda 21/2030 does to affected citizens. The Town of Glenville has enjoyed excellent improvements. However, it does not appear that the plans installing technology violating rights of the residents are of any concern to any or all of those involved. Here’s hoping that changes.
There is a simple solution. An opt-out of an AMR Water Meter without any penalty or fee is all that is needed.
January 17, 2018 – Town Board Meeting, Town of Glenville https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu7qKugJXvg
www.technocracy.news/index.php/2017/11/06/rise-water-data-means-control-water-land/
A bill introduced on January 3rd by New York Sen. Kevin Parker would allow customers to opt out of installing Smart meter’ technology.
Without question this is a critical bill to move forward and get passed. What this bill does not appear to list are the Smart Water Meters although the criteria designating this technology stated under this bill would qualify for inclusion. As of now the bill list meters related to electric or gas corporations.
Smart Water Meters do need to get included. Writing and calling Senator Parker, contact Senator Parker’s Office, and all member of the energy committee to support and suggest the addition of smart water meters to the bill. Requesting one’s representative to co-sponsor would strengthen the chance to get out committee.
As of this posting the list of members of the Energy Committees may or may not correctly reflect (updated) the 2018 members.
Links for the both the NY Senate or Assembly: New York Senate Energy and Telecommunications Committee and the Assembly Standing Committee on Energy.
Having the ability to get removed or prevent the installation of any smart meter is essential. As more understand the connection of so many confirmed health impacts that these devices create and the invasive technology compromising privacy is understood the demand by New Yorkers will only explode. It would be great if it were nipped in the bud now!
By Mike Maharrey
Tenth Amendment Center
January 5, 2018
ALBANY, N.Y. (Jan. 5, 2018) – A bill introduced in the New York Senate would allow customers to opt out of installing “smart meter” technology on their homes and businesses. Passage of this bill would allow New Yorkers to protect their own privacy, and it would take a step toward blocking a federal program in effect.
Sen. Kevin Parker (D-Brooklyn) introduced Senate Bill 7214 (S7214) on Jan. 3. The legislation would allow New Yorkers to opt out of any utility company smart meter program with no penalty.
Smart meters monitor home energy usage in minute detail in real time. The devices transmit data to the utility company where it gets stored in databases. Anybody with access to the data can download it for analysts. Without specific criteria limiting access to the data, these devices create significant privacy issues. Smart meters can also be used to remotely limit power usage during peak hours.
S7214 provides a comprehensive smart meter opt-out right for utility customers.
It shall be the right of every customer of an electric and/or gas corporation, at no penalty, fee or service charge to decline the permission of his or her electric and/or gas corporation, (a) to replace an existing meter at such customer’s premises that is assigned to such customer’s account with a two-way smart meter or (b) to install any two-way smart meter device at his or her property without such customer’s consent.
The legislation would also require utility companies to give customers 90-day notice before installing smart meter technology with a right to decline installation. It would further allow a customer to require removal of a smart meter with no charge for one year after installation.
S7214 is a companion bill to A3066 currently pending in the New York Assembly.
Privacy Concerns
The proliferation of smart meters creates significant privacy concerns. The data collected can tell anybody who holds it a great deal about what goes on inside a home. It can reveal when residents are at home, asleep or on vacation. It can also pinpoint “unusual” energy use, and could someday serve to help enforce “energy usage” regulations. The ACLU summarized the privacy issues surrounding smart meters in a recent report.
“The temptation to use the information that will be collected from customers for something other than managing electrical loads will be strong – as it has been for cell phone tracking data and GPS information. Police may want to know your general comings and goings or whether you’re growing marijuana in your basement under grow lights. Advertisers will want the information to sell you a new washing machine to replace the energy hog you got as a wedding present 20 years ago. Information flowing in a smart grid will become more and more ‘granular’ as the system develops.”
The privacy issues aren’t merely theoretical. According to information obtained by the California ACLU, utility companies in the state have disclosed information gathered by smart meters on thousands of customers. San Diego Gas and Electric alone disclosed data on more than 4,000 customers. The vast majority of disclosures were in response to subpoenas by government agencies “often in drug enforcement cases or efforts to find specific individuals,” according to SFGate.
“Mark Toney, executive director of the Utility Reform Network watchdog group, said the sheer number of data disclosures made by SDG&E raised the possibility that government agencies wanted to sift through large amounts of data looking for patterns, rather than conducting targeted investigations.”
No Smart Meter, No Data
Refusing to allow a smart meter on your property is the only sure-fire way to ensure your energy use data won’t fall into the hands of government agents or private marketers, or end up stored in some kind of government database. Passage of S7214 would make opting out a legal option for New Yorkers and give them control over their own privacy.
Impact on Federal Program
The federal government serves as a major source of funding for smart meters. A 2009 program through the U.S. Department of Energy distributed $4.5 billion for smart grid technology. The initial projects were expected to fund the installation of 1.8 million smart meters over three years.
The federal government lacks any constitutional authority to fund smart grid technology. The easiest way to nullify such programs is to simply not participate. A3066 would make that possible. If enough states pass similar legislation, and enough people opt out, the program will go nowhere.
We’ve seen a similar opt-out movement undermining Common Core in New York. Opting out follows a strategy James Madison advised in Federalist #46. “Refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union” provides a powerful means to fight back against government overreach. Such actions in multiple states would likely be effective in bringing down federal smart meter programs.
UP NEXT
S7214 was referred to the Senate Energy and Telecommunications Committee where it will need to pass by a majority vote before moving forward in the legislative process.
Source: http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2018/01/new-york-bill-would-allow-customers-to-opt-out-of-smart-meters-undermine-federal-program-3/
________________________________________________________________________
7214
IN SENATE
January 3, 2018
___________
Introduced by Sen. PARKER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Energy and Telecommuni-
cations
AN ACT to amend the public service law, in relation to advanced metering
infrastructure devices for residential services
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
bly, do enact as follows:
1 Section 1. The public service law is amended by adding a new section
2 67-b to read as follows:
3 § 67-b. Advanced metering infrastructure devices for electric and gas
4 services. 1. The commission shall not allow for the installation of any
5 advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) device by an electric and/or gas
6 corporation unless such device meets or exceeds the following standards
7 for AMI performance and safety, which shall include:
8 (a) Federal Communications Commission standards for intentional and
9 unintentional radio frequency emissions and any other relevant standards
10 related to radio frequency exposure;
11 (b) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) specifications for
12 meter accuracy and performance; and
13 (c) any other standards, requirements and guidelines established by
14 the commission to protect customer health and safety and ensure, to the
15 fullest extent possible, the protection and encryption of customer
16 personal, financial and energy usage information. The commission shall
17 promulgate regulations necessary to effectuate this subdivision.
18 2. For purposes of this section advanced metering infrastructure shall
19 include:
20 (a) a one-way smart meter, which shall mean a device designed to
21 utilize one-way communications systems, including but not limited to:
22 (i) power line carrier; (ii) radio frequency; (iii) wireless fidelity
23 network; (iv) telephony; and (v) the internet to transmit customer usage
24 data to an electric and/or gas corporation for the purposes of billing;
25 and be designed to be capable of measuring and storing customer electric
26 and/or gas usage data, including time of use in real time; or
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD08581-01-7
S. 7214 2
1 (b) two-way smart meter, which shall mean a device that is designed to
2 utilize two-way communications systems, including but not limited to:
3 (i) radio frequency; (ii) wireless fidelity network; or (iii) the inter-
4 net to transmit electric usage and pricing data between an electric
5 and/or gas corporation and its customers, where such device is capable
6 of (A) measuring usage data and transmitting such data in intervals of
7 at least once per day; (B) receiving in real-time, per-kilowatt hour
8 (kWh) and/or per (therm) gas and electric supply and delivery rates; (C)
9 detecting customer service disruptions and transmitting such information
10 to an electric and/or gas corporation; and (D) storing customer usage
11 data.
12 3. It shall be the right of every customer of an electric and/or gas
13 corporation, at no penalty, fee or service charge to decline the permis-
14 sion of his or her electric and/or gas corporation, (a) to replace an
15 existing meter at such customer's premises that is assigned to such
16 customer's account with a two-way smart meter or (b) to install any
17 two-way smart meter device at his or her property without such custom-
18 er's consent.
19 4. An electric and/or gas corporation may not install a two-way smart
20 meter on a customer's premises that is assigned to such customer's
21 account unless it shall provide written notice to the customer no less
22 than ninety days prior to the scheduled installation of such meter. Such
23 notice shall provide that:
24 (a) the customer shall have the right to decline his or her electric
25 and/or gas corporation from installing a two-way smart meter with no
26 fee, penalty or service charge;
27 (b) the customer may, at any point during a period of three hundred
28 sixty-five days following the installation of a two-way smart meter,
29 require the removal of such device with no fee, penalty or service
30 charge;
31 (c) the customer may be liable for a fee to be determined by the
32 commission for the removal of a two-way smart meter device if the
33 customer requests the removal more than three hundred sixty-five days
34 following the installation of such meter at his or her premises.
35 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
https://legiscan.com/NY/bill/S07214/2017
Archives
September 2020
March 2020
January 2020
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
Categories
All
1st Amendment Rights
2nd Amendment Rights
4th Amendment Rights
5G
Agenda 21/2030
Child Abuse
Christianity
Climate Change 'Hoax'
Coronavirus COVID 19
Coronavirus COVID-19
Cybersecurity
Deep State
DEW Directed Energy Weapons
EMF
Fake News
False Flags
GeoEngineering
GMO's
Gun Control
Health
Immigration
IoT
Islam
LED Light
Mid Term Elections 2018
Natural Born
News
New York
No Fluoride
NWO
Organic
Police State
SCOTUS
Secret Government
Smart Grid
Smart Meters
Technocracy
Town Of Glenville
U.S. Constitution
Vaccines
Weather Warfare
WiFi