The article from PCMag opining on the problems with 5G is critically important. Why? A major on line publisher PCMag is talking about it helping to make this issue go mainstream and raise awareness. It's good to see that a well known online publication and author express concerns on a technology such as 5G that needs serious consideration for burial and prevented from implementation. This article provides excellent reasons as to why. CY "The technology might be the problem, but even worse for the companies behind it is the perception that 5G is already unsafe before they even get it on a single pole." JCD By John C. Dvorak Original Posting on PC: August 22, 2018 12:21PM EST If you read the barrage of scary literature about 5G mobile phone technology, specifically the use of millimeter wave frequencies to transmit data, you must conclude that it is a bad bet. I'm not saying this because the technology does not work. It's a bad bet because so little is known about the effects of millimeter waves (30GHz-300GHz). While these frequencies only permeate a small fraction of the human epidermis (the skin), the effect on the cornea, in particular, needs serious research. Because the industry is too cheap to study the health effects of the technology itself, it lets this sort of product out the door despite the fact that it has already been weaponized by the military. These frequencies are so poor at travelling long distances, they need a transmitter on nearly every telephone pole and light pole to make 5G work. 5G is already getting some bad publicity, which could result in everything from bans on the technology to equipment destruction by vigilantes. Of course, when you read deeper into what the chip and telecom companies are trying to do, you quickly discover that many systems calling themselves 5G are currently 4G mods using 5G as a marketing tool. Let's ignore that scam and stay focused on millimeter waves. As usual, the mostly arrogant (or naïve) technology industry is caught flat-footed at the negative reaction. It always figures that the stupid public will buy into anything new and jazzy if it makes their handheld phone seem a little faster, and even pay more for the privilege of the upgrade. One of the ways the industry has made this all work in the past is by quick implementation followed by a "Hey look it works! Nobody was killed" approach. That cannot happen with true 5G, which needs all these mini-towers all over the place. That leaves plenty more time for the public to get a clue and be freaked out. When you do a search for "5G is Safe" on Google and Bing, you get a number of negative stories and a laundry list of why some people believe it's unsafe. Companies may as well begin to market a 5G mobile phone with a skull and crossbones on it. If this bad PR is somehow reversed and 5G takes over the market, I will be shocked. The way it is going does not bode well for any of it. John C. Dvorak Columnist, PCMag.com John C. Dvorak is a columnist for PCMag.com and the co-host of the twice weekly podcast, the No Agenda Show (Full biography linked to the name) Source: https://www.pcmag.com/commentary/363244/the-problem-with-5g Excerpts from the comments posted on PCMag for this article provided by smart and obviously critical thinkers. Go directly to the article for more excellent information they provide. "Every piece of independent research (and their are thousands of studies) shows devastating biological harm. There are no studies that indicate no harm (except for a few lame industry studies that cannot be taken seriously given their funding sources). For those who believe the government has standards - they do not. The one standard for microwave exposure is based on heating (thermal) effects and is designed only for workers who may be actually working ON a cell tower. In 1996, the federal government stripped away our rights to reject placement of microwave/ RF emitting devices in the FCC act of 1996 section 704 based on biological, health and environmental concerns. Which is why we’re seeing these towers spring up on school campuses!" CS "As the Harvard School of Ethics' expose "Captured Agency" shows, the FCC has been hijacked by Big Wireless, which makes the tobacco industry look like Mr. Rogers. None of these technologies have been safety tested for long-term exposure, especially to multiple sources with 24/7 exposure." TD "We know there are going to be huge profits for the telecoms and for the government as it sells off these airwaves. (H.R.4953/S.1682 (AIRWAVES)) We know that the Chairman of the FCC is a Verizon connection. And DON’T forget the cost of 5G to the public which includes the network deployment of short-lifespan satellites via suborbital rockets. WHAT’S that going to cost the public? Now, these satellites will not only cost the public BUT will also cause serious atmospheric harm due black carbon emissions which will affect the ozone." CKC Update October 14, 2018 Related Article PC Magazine deletes article about problems with 5G, and fires its author (John C. Dvorak from the No Agenda Show podcast) The Problem With 5G
#Stop5G #5G #No5G #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #CellTowers #IoT #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer #NoSmartMeters #NoAMRWaterMeters #LEDLights #SmartMeters #AMRWaterMeters
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
September 2020
Categories
All
|