Cell Phone RADIATION & 5G DANGERS | An In-Depth Exploration
#5GIsAnExtinctionEvent #SaveTheInsects #5GLiscensedToKill #SayNoTo5G #5G #No5G #5GKills #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #DEW #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #Health #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer
0 Comments
The first eight months of WWII with no fighting – was called The Phoney War. Using millimetre waves as a fifth-generation or 5G wireless communications technology is a phoney war of another kind. This phoney war is also silent, but this time shots are being fired – in the form of laser-like beams of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from banks of thousands of tiny antennas[1] – and almost no one in the firing line knows that they are being silently, seriously and irreparably injured. In the first instance, 5G is likely to make people electro-hypersensitive (EHS).[2] Perhaps it was sitting in front of two big computer screens for many of the 18 years I worked at the UN that made me EHS. When the UN Office at Vienna installed powerful WiFi and cellphone access points – designed to serve large, public areas – in narrow, metal-walled corridors throughout the Vienna International Centre in December 2015, I was ill continuously for seven months. I did my best for two and a half years to alert the UN staff union, administration and medical service to the danger to the health of UN staff of EMR from these access points, but was ignored. That’s why, in May 2018, I took the issue to the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres [transcript]. He is a physicist and electrical engineer and lectured on telecommunications signals early in his career, yet asserted that he knew nothing about this. He undertook to ask the World Health Organization to look into it, but seven months later those public access points remain in place. I received no replies to my many follow-up emails. As a result, I welcomed the opportunity to join the effort to publish an International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space because it was clear to me that, despite there having been 43 earlier scientific appeals, very few people understood the dangers of EMR. My experience as an editor could help ensure that a new 5G appeal, including the issue of beaming 5G from space, was clear, comprehensive, explanatory, and accessible to the non-scientist. The International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space is fully referenced, citing over a hundred scientific papers among the tens of thousands on the biological effects of EMR published over the last 80 years.[3] Having spent years editing UN documents dealing with space, I know that outer space is hotly contested geopolitically and any untoward event involving a military satellite risks triggering a catastrophic response.[4] Space law is so inadequate – just one example is the complexity of space liability law [5],[6] – that we could really call the Earth orbits a new Wild West. China caused international consternation in 2007 when it demonstrated an anti-satellite weapon by destroying its own satellite. Space debris is the main concern among space-faring nations, with a so-called Kessler syndrome positing a cascade of space debris that could make the Earth orbits unusable for a thousand years.[7] Does launching 20,000+ commercial 5G satellites in such circumstances sound rational to you? I live in Vienna, Austria, where the 5G rollout is suddenly upon us. Within the last five weeks, pre-5G has been officially announced at Vienna airport and 5G at the Rathausplatz, the main square in Vienna, which attracts tens of thousands of visitors to its Christmas market each December and skating rink each January, which are special treats for children. Along with birds and insects, children are the most vulnerable to 5G depredation because of their little bodies.[8] Friends and acquaintances and their children in Vienna are already reporting the classic symptoms of EMR poisoning:[9] nosebleeds, headaches, eye pains, chest pains, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, tinnitus, dizziness, flu-like symptoms, and cardiac pain. They also report a tight band around the head; pressure on the top of the head; short, stabbing pains around the body; and buzzing internal organs. Other biological effects such as tumours and dementia usually take longer to manifest, but in the case of 5G, which has never been tested for health or safety, who knows?[10] Seemingly overnight a forest of 5G infrastructure has sprouted in Austria. In the space of three weeks one friend has gone from robust health to fleeing this country, where she has lived for 30 years. Each person experiences EMR differently. For her, it was extreme torture so she and I spent her last two nights in Austria sleeping in the woods. Interestingly, as she drove across southern Germany, she suffered torture even worse than in Austria, while in northern Germany she had no symptoms at all and felt completely normal, which suggests that there has been as yet no 5G rollout there. There are no legal limits on exposure to EMR. Conveniently for the telecommunications industry, there are only non-legally enforceable guidelines such as those produced by the grandly named International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection, which turns out to be like the Wizard of Oz, just a tiny little NGO in Germany that appoints its own members, none of whom is a medical doctor or environmental expert.[11] Like the Wizard of Oz, ICNIRP seems to have magical powers. Its prestidigitation makes non-thermal (non-heating) effects of EMR exposure disappear into thin air, for taking into account the tens of thousands of research studies demonstrating the biological effects of EMR would invalidate its so-called safety guidelines.[12]It has bewitched the International Telecommunication Union, part of the UN family, into recognising these guidelines.[13] And one little email sent to ICNIRP in October 2018 to submit Professor Martin Pall’s comments on ICNIRP’s new draft guidelines conjured up an immediate explosion of interest in the sender’s online presence – which had hitherto attracted none – from companies and individuals worldwide, one country’s immigration authorities, the office of the Austrian Chancellor (head of government), a firm of lawyers in Vienna and even Interpol![14],[15] I hope that people read and share our Stop 5G Space Appeal to wake up themselves and others quickly and use it to take action themselves to stop 5G. Even eight short months of this 5G Phoney War could spell catastrophe for all life on Earth. Elon Musk is set to launch the first 4,425 5G satellites in June 2019 and “blanket” the Earth with 5G, in breach of countless international treaties. This could initiate the last great extinction, courtesy of the multi-trillion-US-dollar 5G, the biggest biological experiment and most heinous manifestation of hubris and greed in human history.[10] People’s first reaction to the idea that 5G may be an existential threat to all life on Earth is usually disbelief and/or cognitive dissonance. Once they examine the facts, however, their second reaction is often terror. We need to transcend this in order to see 5G as an opportunity to empower ourselves, take responsibility and take action. We may have already lost 80 per cent of our insects to EMR in the last 20 years.[16] Our trees risk being cut down by the millions in order to ensure continuous 5G signalling for self-driving cars, buses and trains.[17] Are we going to stand by and see ourselves and our children irradiated, our food systems decimated, our natural surroundings destroyed? Our newspapers are now casually popularising the meme that human extinction would be a good thing,[18],[19] but when the question becomes not rhetorical but real, when it’s your life, your child, your community, your environment that is under immediate threat, can you really subscribe to such a suggestion? If you don’t, please sign the Stop 5G Appeal and get active in contacting everyone you can think of who has the power to stop 5G, especially Elon Musk[20] and the CEOs of all the other companies planning to launch 5G satellites, starting in just 20 weeks from now. Life on Earth needs your help now. The transcript of my exchange with the UN Secretary-General of 14 May 2018 follows:
Note to readers: please click the share buttons below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc. Claire Edwards, BA Hons, MA – worked for the United Nations as Editor and Trainer in Intercultural Writing from 1999 to 2017. Notes [1] Delos, Peter. “The Way to a New Phased Array Radar Architecture.” TechTime: Electronics & Technology News. January 15, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://techtime.news/2018/01/ 15/analog-devices-phased-array-radar/. “Although there is a lot of discussion of massive MIMO and automotive radar, it should not be forgotten that most of the recent radar development and beamforming R&D has been in the defense industry, and it is now being adapted for commercial applications. While phased array and beamforming moved from R&D efforts to reality in the 2000s, a new wave of defense focused arrays are now expected, enabled by industrial technology offering solutions that were previously cost prohibitive.” [2] “Electrosensitive Testimonials.” We Are The Evidence. 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019.http://wearetheevidence.org/adults-who-developed-electro-sensitivity/. “WATE intends to expose the suppressed epidemic of sickness, suffering and human rights crisis created by wireless technology radiation; elevate the voice of those injured; defend and secure their rights and compel society and governments to take corrective actions and inform the public of the harm.” [3] Glaser, Lt. Z. “Cumulated Index to the Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (‘effects’) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-frequency Radiation: Report, Supplements (no. 1-9).” BEMS Newsletter B-1 through B-464 (1984). Accessed January 1, 2019. http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Zory-Glasers-index.pdf. Lt. Zorach Glaser, PhD, catalogued 5,083 studies, books and conference reports for the US Navy through 1981. [4] “Space Sustainability: A Practical Guide.” Secure World Foundation, 2014, 21. Accessed January 1, 2019.https://swfound.org/media/206289/swf_space_sustainability-a_practical_guide_2018__1.pdf. “However, as more countries integrate space into their national military capabilities and rely on space-based information for national security, there is an increased chance that any interference (either actual or perceived) with satellites could spark or escalate tensions and conflict in space or on Earth. This is made all the more difficult by the challenge of determining the exact cause of a satellite malfunction: whether it was due to a space weather event, impact by space debris, unintentional interference, or deliberate act of aggression.” [5] “Space Law: Liability for Space Debris.” Panish, Shea & Boyle LLP. 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019.https://www.aviationdisasterlaw.com/liability-for-space-debris/. “Filing a lawsuit against SpaceX for space debris is a little different than one against the commercial industry or state-sponsored launch. Since SpaceX is a private company, injured parties can file claims directly against the establishment in accord with the state’s personal injury laws. For the claim to be successful, the plaintiff will have to prove that SpaceX was negligent in some way that caused the space debris collision. Space law is notoriously complex, making it very difficult for injured parties to recover for [sic] their damages in California.” [6]Von Der Dunk, Frans G. “Liability versus Responsibility in Space Law: Misconception or Misconstruction?” University of Nebraska-Lincoln College of Law: Space, Cyber, and Telecommunications Law Program Faculty Publications 21 (1992). Accessed January 1, 2019. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/spacelaw/21/?utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu/spacelaw/ [7]Kessler, D. J., P. M. Landry, B. G. Cour-Palais, and R. E. Taylor. “Aerospace: Collision Avoidance in Space: Proliferating Payloads and Space Debris Prompt Action to Prevent Accidents.” IEEE Spectrum 17, no. 6 (1980): 37-41. [8] Morgan, L. Lloyd, Santosh Kesari, and Devra Lee Davis. “Why Children Absorb More Microwave Radiation than Adults: The Consequences.” Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 2, no. 4 (December 2014): 197-204. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S2213879X14000583. Highlights: (1) Children absorb more microwave radiation (MWR) than adults. (2) MWR is a Class 2B (possible) carcinogen. (3) The fetus is in greater danger than children from exposure to MWR. (4) The legal exposure limits have remained unchanged for decades. (5) Cellphone manuals warnings and the 20 cm rule for tablets/laptops violate the “normal operating position” regulation. [9]Electro Hypersensitivity: Talking to Your Doctor. PDF. Canadian Initiative to Stop Wireless, Electric, and Electromagnetic Pollution. http://weepinitiative.org/talkingtoyourdoctor.pdf. [10]FCC Chairman on 5G: “We won’t study it, regulate it, have standards for it.” Youtube. June 20, 2016. Accessed January 1, 2019. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bwgwe01SIMc. Notes in video: Ultra-high frequency radiation (24 to 100 GHz or more); aimed and amplified signals; massive deployment of towers; worth billions; no standards, no testing; sharing with satellite and military operations; all areas (including rural areas) to be saturated with radiation; all local deployments to be fast-tracked; everything to be microchipped. [11] Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD. “Is ICNIRP Reliable Enough to Dictate Meaning of Science to the Governmental Risk Regulators?” Between a Rock and a Hard Place(blog), April 8, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019.https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/type/gallery/. “The major problems of ICNIRP are: (1) it is a “private club” where members elect new members without need to justify selection; (2) lack of accountability before anyone; (3) lack of transparency of their activities; (4) complete lack of supervision of its activities; (5) skewed science evaluation because of the close similarity of the opinions of all members of the Main Commission and all of the other scientists selected as advisors to the Main Commission.” [12] Matthes, Rüdiger. “EMF Safety Guidelines: The ICNIRP View.” International Telecommunications Union Workshop on Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, May 9, 2013. Accessed January 1, 2019.https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/climatechange/emf-1305/Documents/Presentations/s2part1p1-Rued igerMatthes.pdf. [13] ITU Telecommunication Development Sector Study Group 2: Session on Modern Policies, Guidelines, Regulations and Assessments of Human Exposure to RF-EMF. Session 1: Recent Activities on Human Exposure to RF-EMF in ITU and ICNIRP, Geneva, Switzerland. October 10, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019.www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Study-Groups/2018-2021/Pages/ meetings/session-Q7-2-oct18.aspx. “Session 1 will discuss some of the recent activities held in ITU and describe the latest updates to the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection) guidelines.” [14] Martin L. Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University. Response to 2018 ICNIRP Draft Guidelines and Appendices on Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields (100 KHz to 300 GHz). October 8, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019.www.5gexposed.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/FINAL-Martin-L-Pall-Response-to-2018-Draft-Guidelines-8.10.18.pdf. [15] Cooperation Agreement Between The International Criminal Police Organization Interpol and The International Telecommunication Union. Plenipotentiary Conference (PP-18) Dubai 29 October–16 November 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/md/18/pp/c/S18-PP-C-0047!!MSW-E.docx. “2. In implementing the Agreement, each Party shall act within their respective areas of competence. More specifically, the implementation of the Agreement by ITU shall not exceed beyond its mandate pertaining to building confidence and security in the use of ICTs, in accordance to Plenipotentiary Conference Resolution 130 (Rev. Busan, 2014) and to its role on child online protection in accordance to Plenipotentiary Conference Resolution 179 (Rev. Busan, 2014), whereas the implementation of the Agreement by INTERPOL shall not exceed its mandate as defined by article 2 of its Constitution which include activities pertaining to cybercrime and online child exploitation”. (emphasis added) [16] Hallmann C.A., M. Sorg and E. Jongejans. “More than 75 per cent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas.” PLOS One 12, no. 10 (2017): e0185809.http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185809&type=printable. Accessed January 1, 2019. [17] Laville, Sandra. “Millions of Trees at Risk in Secretive Network Rail Felling Programme.” The Guardian, April 29, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/ apr/29/millions-of-trees-at-risk-in-secretive-network-rail-felling-programme. [18] May, Todd. “Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?” The New York Times, December 17, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/17/opinion/human-extinction-climate-change.html. [19] Davis, Nicola. “Falling total fertility rate should be welcomed, population expert says: figures showing declining birth rates are ‘cause for celebration’, not alarm.” The Guardian, December 26, 2018. Accessed January 3, 2019. www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/26/falling-total-fertility-rate-should-be-welcomed-population-expert-says. [20] “Planet Earth: Worldwide 5G Radiation from Orbit?” Letter from Claus Scheingraber, Roland Wolff and others to Elon Musk. June 18, 2018. Brunnthal, Germany. “… We are sure that your satellite project is already at an advanced stage. But even if much money has been invested, one should consider that it is only a matter of time until the fact of damaging health potential of mobile communications – and especially of 5G-mobile communication – can no longer we overlooked. Therefore we emphatically recommend not to implement the satellite project.” (Letter in German) (Letter in English) Featured image is from TruePublica What You Don't Know About 5G but Will Find Out When It's Too Late
#5GIsAnExtinctionEvent #SaveTheInsects #5GLiscensedToKill #SayNoTo5G #5G #No5G #5GKills #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #DEW #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #Health #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer 5G Licensed to Kill. The Insect Inspector investigates what you are not being told about the 5G grid1/30/2019 When it comes to #5G the insects and their population decline is the canary in the coalmine. The critical summary text with the You Tube presentation below is by mickeytwonames, publisher, 5G Licenced to Kill. The Insect Inspector investigates what you are not being told about the 5G grid 5G is a buzzword for the digitally connected world some see as the future of mankind - it comes with risks - the most immediate being that it will be the most effective pesticide since DDT. The Insect Inspector explains how this runaway untested global experiment may kill us all. Simply put, the 30-year radiation from millions of cellular phone masts is the single factor present in every region of insect decline. With the imminent addition of 5G pollution, the situation is about to get much worse. Rather than ridiculing this idea, independent experts from around the world sent me evidence to prove It. They cited papers, experiments, and surveys to show that wireless tech is damaging the ecosphere. Insects are like the canary in the coal mine. Their slump in numbers is a warning to us all. In short, 5G poses a catastrophic threat to bugs the world over. This video is a warning notice so public officials can no longer plead ignorance when rubber stamping its roll-out. 5G is a buzz word for connecting every 'smart' wireless device. The phone, software and internet giants aka Big Wireless are in a bid to dominate society with the Internet of Things - that means controlling as many of your gadgets as they can harvest your profile data from. It is also a push to build a world of industrious robots, automated vehicles and a population of addicted phone Zombies. We are being softened up to accept 5G as "inevitable." Across the media, it is being sold as "game-changing - the next big thing." What no one tells you is how much of a dangerous gamble it is to expose everything on the planet to untested ultra-high-frequency microwave radiation at an unprecedented intensity. The 5G grid, a follow-on, not a replacement for the wireless network we now use, is being built by a powerful self-regulating industry that tolerates no restraint nor criticism. Big Wireless claims 5G is a safe technology on which to build the digital society they want us to connect to. Let me outline the side effects that no one is prepared to talk about but are unavoidable. G5 devices use very high electromagnetic frequencies. Ubiquitous transmitters, planned for every school, shop, and neighbourhood, will generate billions of millimetre length waves. These signals will be the same size as most insects creating an electrical charge between the two. The energy flow also pulses creating tiny shockwaves that damage eyes, wings, antennae, and other delicate body parts. 5G communications have to be powerful enough to penetrate buildings so with nowhere to hide and under relentless bombardment, insects, trapped in an environmental microwave oven, will simply cook. Despite the evidence that 5G is an environmental hazard, the body that regulates Big Wireless has been hijacked by those it is supposed to regulate. It has gained powers and brought influence to steamroller anyone opposed to its impatience to be the first to market. With Governments everywhere lobbied with biased data, the benefits of the 5G Grid are purposely overblown and the drawbacks hidden. No tests have been run for potential damage to the environment - a failing that goes against the UN's Precautionary Principle. A risk analysis put in place after it was proved the asbestos and tobacco industries concealed known risks and dangers. Radiation levels will be100 times above the standards agreed 20 years ago. 5G safety standards are unfit for purpose. We live with wireless tech in our pockets. There is Wifi in our homes already claiming to be 5G - it is not. It is a dupe to make the term acceptable. So dismissing the link of insect decline to invisible wireless radiation is an easy option. But all the signs point to a strong connection between the two. From bugs to birdsong, small things disappearing easily escape our notice, but Insects make our life possible. Their destruction breaks a vital in the food chain. We are not going to give up the convenience of hand-held devices, but we are being hustled into expensive enslavement where we pay for the privilege of being monitored. Make no mistake when all the 5G cells are connected our children will be living in a global airport body scanner 24/7. It's critical to postpone the rollout of what scientists, environmental groups, doctors and citizens see as a potentially toxic infrastructure without a public debate. We must not blindly accept every technological development especially one we are tricked into thinking as Green. Wireless tech gobbles up a whopping 10% of the world's electricity consumption. Let us not sleepwalk towards an insect armageddon that may herald our own. 5G Licensed to Kill. The Insect Inspector investigates what you are not being told about the 5G grid. #SaveTheInsects #5GLiscensedToKill #SayNoTo5G #5G #No5G #5GKills #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #DEW #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #Health #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer The deleterious effects of EMF, RF, Microwave and now 5G radiation has been confirmed and proven. No question that all of this exposure to all living organisms as well the environment where if not stopped could be catastrophic. Awareness is growing, however, it requires a viral knowledge. Post and share all related articles on well researched and vetted information on the harmful effects to social platforms, websites (provide appropriate sourcing) and all forms of media communication to help educate others. Don't allow those attempting to call this fear porn and allow that type of ignorant nonsense to stop your efforts. Just ignore them and do it! CY Public attention about 5G has been focused on the plans of telecom companies to install millions of small cell towers on electric utility poles, on public buildings and schools, on bus stop shelters, in public parks, and anywhere they want in national parks and on federally owned land. In local urban communities there would be a cell tower approximately every 500 feet along every street. As bad as these small cell towers might seem from the standpoint of constant exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation in close proximity to the source, perhaps an even more alarming prospect will be the beaming of millimeter length microwaves at the earth from thousands of new communication satellites. The FCC gave approval to SpaceX on March 29, 2018, to launch 4,425 satellites into low orbit around the Earth. [1] The total number of satellites that is expected to be put into low and high orbit by several companies will be 20,000 satellites. [1] 5G will use Phased Array Antennas to shoot Beams of Radiation at Cell Phones These satellites will use the same type of phased array antennas as will be used by the ground-based 5G systems. This means that they will send tightly focused beams of intense microwave radiation at each specific 5G device that is on the Earth and each device will send a beam of radiation back to the satellite. [2] Previous generations of RF cellular communication used large antennas to send a blanket of radiation in all directions. The lower frequencies they used and the broad distribution of microwaves limited the numbers of cellular devices that could connect through an individual tall tower. The much shorter length microwaves used for 5G will make it possible to use small phased array antennas to send and receive signals. Phased array antennas consist of clusters of hundreds of tiny antennas that work together to shoot a ray of energy at a target just like a bullet. A cluster of these tiny antennas can be arranged in a 4 inch by 4 inch matrix. The rays of microwaves they produce will be strong enough to pass through walls and human bodies. If they were not strong enough to do this, then everyone with a 5G smartphone would have to stand outside when using the devices. [2] Each 5G product will also have multiple phased array antennas which will be used to create a powerful beam of radiation back to the 5G devices mounted on electrical utility poles or toward a specific satellite in space. These beams of radiation will also need to be strong enough to pass through walls and human flesh such as a hand or head to reach the intended destination. [2] This means that if you are in a crowded location, such as an airport or on a train, there will be hundreds if not thousands of invisible beams of radiation flying through the environment at the speed of light. As people move in that environment, their bodies will be penetrated by numerous beams of radiation as they walk or as other people walk around them with their 5G smartphones. [2] 5G Phones will be much more Powerful than Previous Phones The effective radiated power of the 5G phased array antennas in phones will be 10 times more powerful than 4G phones. No one will be free from exposure. In addition, 5G beams of microwave radiation will be received and transmitted from new computer equipment, household appliances, and automobiles. Stationary equipment such as Wi-Fi hubs in homes and offices will be permitted to use microwave beams that are 15 times stronger (300 watts) than the signals from 5G phones or 150 times stronger than 4G phones. [2] Why is 5G so Much More Dangerous than Previous Microwave Communication Systems? Arthur Firstenberg, author, researcher, and advocate for limiting RF exposure from the environment, explains the analysis of 5G radiation that was published in Microwave News in 2002. He stated: When an ordinary electromagnetic field enters the body, it causes charges to move and currents to flow. But when extremely short electromagnetic pulses enter the body [5G], something else happens: the moving charges themselves become little antennas that re-radiate the electromagnetic field and send it deeper into the body. These re-radiated waves are called Brillouin precursors. They become significant when either the power or the phase of the waves changes rapidly enough. 5G will probably satisfy both requirements. This means that the reassurance we are being given—that these millimeter waves are too short to penetrate far into the body—is not true. [2] 5G Satellites Will Fill the Skies These are the companies with the biggest plans to deploy satellites:
Arthur Firstenberg describes the plans of corporations who want to use 5G technology. He states: Honeywell has already signed a memorandum of understanding to become OneWeb’s first large customer—it plans to provide high-speed Wi-Fi on business, commercial, and military aircraft throughout the world. SpaceX would like to provide the equivalent of 5G to every person on the planet. [3] Ground-based 5G Implementation Ground-based 5G systems are already being implemented in dozens of major cities right now. Plans are being approved by hundreds of other cities, which will allow implementation in 2019 and beyond. As I explained in my previous articles, cities do not have the right to “say no” to 5G. FCC regulations prevent cities from objecting on the basis of health concerns – they only can speak to issues of esthetics and the practical matter of the placement of equipment. They are required to “say yes,” and they better do it quickly, or telecom companies will threaten them with legal action for obstructing their plans. Satellite Based 5G Implementation The first two 5G test satellites were launched by SpaceX in February of 2018. Hundreds of other satellites are expected to be launched in 2019. The full set of 20,000 satellites could be put in orbit during the next two years. To put this into perspective, as of September 2017 there were 1,738 operating satellites into orbit around the Earth. This means the number of satellites will be 11 times greater than the current number. [4 Environmental Catastrophe from Rockets used to Launch SatellitesRocket fuel is very destructive to the Earth’s ozone layer which protects us from the harsh effects of radiation from the sun. In 2017, there were 90 rocket launch attempts worldwide. [5] The rockets that use solid fuel produce massive ozone depletion. While rockets using liquid kerosene as fuel destroy less ozone, they release massive amounts of black carbon soot into the air, especially at high altitudes. If the number of annual rocket launches increases by 10 or more times, which is likely under the plans these corporations have made, computer models suggest that the combination of ozone depletion and release of black soot could produce a 3 degree warming effect over the Antarctic and reduce the ozone in the world’s atmosphere by 4%. [3] Even though it will be possible for a single rocket to put multiple satellites into orbit, we are still talking about a 10 or 20 fold increase in environmental damage over what is being produced today. [3] The 5G satellites have a relatively short lifespan, perhaps only 5 years, which means there will be high numbers of rocket launches, not just in the next few years, but in every year for the foreseeable future. [3] Mercury-based Rocket Fuel Could Spread Neurotoxins Over the Earth As bad as liquid and solid rocket fuels will be for the environment, Apollo Fusion is developing a mercury-based propulsion system for launching rockets. These ion propulsion rocket engines use powerful magnets to push away small charged particles at high speeds, which generates thrust. NASA experimented with mercury ion propulsion in the 1960s, but abandoned the research. Mercury is an extremely strong neurotoxin, which is harmful to all forms of life, especially humans. The risks of an environmental catastrophe are monumental, because if there was a malfunction and one of these engines exploded, highly toxic mercury would be spread through the atmosphere and over the Earth. [6] All the talk from telecom companies about 5G being a panacea for environmental protection and energy conservation is quite ridiculous when we think about the environmental damage that will be created by any of the rocket engines they choose to use for launching their satellites. Space Junk will Pollute the Earth Each satellite will be the size of a small refrigerator and will weigh approximately 880 pounds. [4] With a life expectancy of only 5-years [3], this means there will be a massive amount of space junk orbiting the Earth. Eventually, all those satellites will fall down to Earth and will burn up as they enter the Earth’s atmosphere. All the hazardous materials in the satellites will be released into the air and will float down to the ground as dust or in droplets of rain. Telecom Companies are Creating a Worldwide Disaster in the Name of Technological Progress 5G is promoted as being the next great wonder in the plan to advance technology to create smart cities where everything and everyone is instantly connected in real time with no lags or lost signals. Of course there will be a few costs. Everyone will be irradiated with millimeter-size, non-ionizing radiation 24 hours a day with completely unknown health effects. Studies designed to investigate harm from 5G will be completed many years after the 5G systems on the ground and in space are fully implemented. At that point it is very unlikely that telecom companies would dismantle their systems even if it is shown that their technology is causing cancer and other diseases. They would just deny the risks. They will tell us that the science was settled decades ago. They will tell us that evidence linking 5G to cancer and other diseases is just a conspiracy theory that only a few crackpots believe. Millions of people will suffer from radiation exposure with symptoms such as headaches, weakness, brain fog, impaired ability to learn and reason, chest pain, and numerous other symptoms that will baffle most conventional physicians. There is Nowhere to Hide from 5G Radiation Today, it is possible to live in a location that has reduced levels of microwave exposure. This is accomplished by choosing a living space that is far away from cell phone towers. However, in the near future, it won’t matter where we live, because 5G will irradiate us wherever we happen to live or work. Cities Can’t Say No to 5G Implementation FCC regulations have been structured in such a way that local municipalities cannot stop telecom companies from installing 5G. They are specifically prohibited from trying to delay or stop 5G implementation on the basis of health concerns. Their only recourse is to try to make the ground-based 5G system somewhat more esthetically pleasant. Based on what has been happening around the country, telecom companies are sweeping aside local resistance and gaining approval for their 5G systems in rapid succession. Can 5G Implementation be Stopped? As far as I can tell, at this point, the only way that 5G will be stopped will be by congressional action. If enough people raise a stink with their elected officials, then perhaps 5G could be put on hold while studies are done to examine the true health risks. Telecom investment in 5G has been massive. They are planning full implementation on the ground and in space in the next couple years. The time to object is now and not after hundreds of thousands of people become sick. [7] If you would like to watch an in-depth presentation on the risks and hazards of 5G, then please view the following presentation. Listen to Arthur Firstenberg discuss the history, science, and description of 5G, including 5G from satellites in space and its expected effects on all living things: Cell Phone Task Force, Taos, New Mexico, August 2, 2018 You also may wish to review some of my [John P. Thomas] previous articles about the risks of 5G and other forms of radio frequency exposure. Public Waking up to Fact that 5G has not been Proven Safe for Human Health5G Technology is Coming – Linked to Cancer, Heart Disease, Diabetes, Alzheimer’s, and Death Cell Phone and Wi-Fi Exposure to the Eyes Causes Long-Term Damage New 5G Cell Towers and Smart Meters to Increase Microwave Radiation – Invade Privacy Smart Meters: Countdown to a National Crisis of Illness and Death Will Driverless Cars Cause DNA Damage and Cancer? How Big Technology Companies Control the Minds of the Masses through Smart Phone Addiction About the Author John P. Thomas is a health writer for Health Impact News. He holds a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Michigan, and a Master of Science in Public Health (M.S.P.H.) from the School of Public Health, Department of Health Administration, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. References [1] “Planetary Emergency,” Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force. [2] “5G – from Blankets to Bullets,” Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force. [3] “WiFi in the Sky,” Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force. [4] “5G from Space,” Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force. [5] “2017 Space Launch Statistics,” – Spaceflight101. [6] “Space Startup Apollo Fusion Wants To Use Mercury as a Fuel,” Avery Thompson, Popular Mechanics, 11/20/2018. [7] Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force, Taos, New Mexico, 8/12/2018. Additional Related Articles: UN Staff Member Says 5G Is War On Humanity Dr. Martin Pall To The NIH: "5G Rollout Is Absolutely Insane." 5G Can End Humanity As We Know It Top 20 Facts on 5G: What You Need To Know About 5G Wireless and "Smart" Cells 20,000 Satellites for 5G to be Launched Sending Focused Beams of Intense Microwave Radiation Over Entire Earth
#5G #No5G #CellTowers #Satellites #5GSatellites #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #DEW #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #Health #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer American Intelligence Media Published on Oct 18, 2018 5G is no laughing matter. We need to understand what this technology will do to the human race, from physical to spiritual harms. After you listen to Michael McKibben and Douglas Gabriel discuss this subject, learn more about the technology and ways that you can protect you and your family: patriots4truth.org/2018/10/18/5g-can-end-humanity-as-we-know-it/ 5G Can End Humanity As We Know It
#Stop5G #5G #No5G #5GKills #WeaponizedTechnology #MilitaryTechnology #CrowdControl #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #IoT #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer #NetNeutrality #ChineseCommunistParty #DriverlessCars #SocialCreditScore #Tyranny Erin Elizabeth, Health Nut News reports that PC Mag 'censored' John C. Dvorak's article on 5G that was published back in August opining on it's dangers. PC Mag then fires Dvorak after 30 years. There is nothing less than a tsunami of articles reporting on the serious health dangers that 5G will bring. It has also been recently been revealed that 5G is militarized weaponized technology used for crowd control by the U.S and also originally invented by Israel as a military weapon. Everyone needs to consider why this type of technology where installation of approximately every 300-500 feet in front of homes, shopping areas, towns and cities would be a good thing when its frequencies pulsing 24/7 can harm you. Everyone also needs to consider as to why PC Mag censored and removed information written by a well respected journalist opining on concerns of 5G technology then replacing with with flowery propaganda on a dangerous technology. The FCC just removed the rights of state and local municipalities control over the installation of the 5G network thus allowing the Telecom industry to install willy-nilly in spite of costs burdens to municipalities, existing infrastructure concerns and risks. Why was this done in spite of nation wide opposition by town, city and state governments submitted to the FCC during the very shortened comment period? None is this is acceptable and censorship of truth is not an option in a Constitutional Republic. PC Mag now falls into the category of Fake News. CY John C. Dvorak's article was re-published here on August 24, 2018: The Problem with 5g by Erin Elizabeth | Oct 12, 2018 John C. Dvorak from the No Agenda Show podcast wrote for PC Magazine for THIRTY YEARS. However, while he wrote extensively for the magazine, in August of this year he wrote a less than “PC” (pun intended!) article about the dangers of 5G (read it here) entitled, “The Problem With 5G”. Unhappy with what he wrote, the magazine fired him, removed his original content, then replaced it with some industry supported drivel (read that here). (Yikes, they really didn’t like what he had to say!) RELATED STORY: And before you think that perhaps Dvorak’s work just wasn’t up to snuff, you can still find all his old columns- alive and active, here. It seems they just needed to silence his opinion. RELATED STORY: So, if you are curious about what 5G is and why’s it’s surrounded in controversy, check out the video below. (And maybe try to live as far away from it as possible.) RELATED STORY (posted from Health Nut News): Related Articles: The Problem with 5g PC Magazine deletes article about problems with 5G, and fires its author (John C. Dvorak from the No Agenda Show podcast) #Stop5G #5G #No5G #PCMag #JohnCDvorak #WeaponizedTechnology #MilitaryTechnology #CrowdControl #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #IoT #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer #FakeNews
Ben Swann Published on Oct 4, 2018 "The circus that has surrounded the Bret Kavanaugh nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court has been drowned out by 36 year old, uncorroborated accusations of sexual harassment. But the truth is that Kavanaugh's record demonstrates that he is not a constitutionalist and has acted as an enemy to the 4th and 5th Amendments." Ben Swann, Reality Check And what else occurred during this circus that all did not pay attention to? Well, there was the 5G summit held at the end of September where POTUS accelerates the implementation of 5G. https://www.cnet.com/news/white-house-hosts-5g-summit/ This is without the careful scrutiny of health concerns and why would the FCC rule that it would be FORCED on you removing the local governments rights for controlling installation of 5G. Did you know that 5G was invented by Israel as a WEAPONZIED technology? Yet, the country of Israel refuses to install. WHY? Let that sink in. https://rense.com/general96/5g-is-an-israeli-creation-of-mass-mind-control.htm And what about the new NAFTA (USMCA)? Is it really all that good? Check out this article highlighting how America will become a second-tier country and the national sovereignty is done! All of this occurring while the court of public opinion is either rallying for an individual having little concern over the United States Constitution or indoctrinating the rest to rally for no due process. Essentially the results are the same. Let that sink in. https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/north-america/item/30208-new-nafta-text-of-u-s-mexico-canada-agreement-usmca-revealed How does a president's mantra for a great America allow for these atrocities to occur? If you cannot see what just also transpired behind the Kavanaugh circus then you are not truly paying attention and are allowing your emotions to control your thinking and will not accept the unthinkable. Does anyone have critical thought anymore? Get your emotions put aside and see it this for what it is! Maybe the fooling and the deceiving of ALL American citizens is the real October surprise. Every bit was orchestrated and endorsed by all. The ‘near perfect’ psyop just occurred. Most of you are all freaking asleep. Related Article: Bret Kavanuagh Confirmed Possibly Most Conservative Supreme Court Since 1934. Really? 3 Constitutional Reasons Why Kavanaugh Should Not Be On The Supreme Court
#BenSwann #RealityCheck #JudgeKavanaugh #NAFTA #USMCA #5G #Stop5G #StopTechnocracy #SCOTUS #USConstitution #POTUS #MindControl #WeaponizedTechnology #Psyop By B.N. Frank According to pro-industry publication, Smart Cities Dive:
The Dive has already published articles about citizens who aren’t keen on 5G technology or “Smart Cities.” However, they are still pro-industry. Keep that in mind if/when you read their articles. Of course, most – but not all – articles published by pro-industry publications are going to be pro-tech everything. And some – but not all – articles published by the mainstream media include inaccurate information about harm caused by exposure to technology. Regardless, decades of research has already proven that exposure to cell towers and all sources of cell phone and wireless radiation can be harmful and in more ways than cancer risk. That’s why there are an increasing number of American children, teenagers, doctors, environmental organizations, firefighters, municipal organizations, tribal groups and more who aren’t happy AT ALL about having no control over wireless infrastructure installation in front of their homes and throughout in their communities. They are not backing down. One municipality enacted an “urgency ordinance” after it received 145 letters from concerned citizens expressing their worries over new 5G towers. The Federal Communications Commission is NOT a health or environmental protection organization. However, their job is to regulate The Telecom Industry (aka Big Wireless). They are supposed to protect the public but they are not. This isn’t a new thing either. Activist Post has covered FCC shenanigans many times. Current FCC Commissioner, Brendan Carr, current FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, and former FCC Chairman, Tom Wheeler all seem to have sold out to The Telecom Industry. Many of our elected officials have as well – but fortunately not all of them. For more information on what you can do to stop wireless infrastructure from being installed throughout your community, visit the following websites:
U.S. Conference of Mayors Will Sue FCC If They Eliminate Local Control Over 5G Small Cell tower And Infrastructure Installation
#Stop5G #5G #No5G #FCC #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #U.S.CouncilOfMayors #WiFi #CellTowers #IoT #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer Environmental Health Trust provides extensive information on 5G, EMF. Microwave, Wireless Issues, as well as actionable tools for protecting children, communities and schools. The article re-posted reflects the high degree of professionalism and comprehensive reviews on these concerning issues such as 5G and steps that can be taken to reduce environmental risks and is an outstanding resource! CY What You Need To Know About 5G Wireless and “Small” Cells 20 Facts About 5G BY - Environmental Health Trust Download a PDF of this information on a two page EHT Factsheet on 5G and Health. The factsheet is hyperlinked (blue text) to research and sources. It is a great resource for policymakers. Nationwide, communities are being told by wireless companies that it is necessary to build “small cell” wireless facilities in neighborhoods on streetlight and utility poles in order to offer 5G, a new technology that will connect the Internet of Things (IoT). At the local, state, and federal level, new legislation and new zoning aim to streamline the installation of these 5G “small cell” antennas in public rights-of-way. 1. 5G “small cell antennas are to be placed in neighborhoods everywhere.
Wireless antennas emit microwaves — non-ionizing radiofrequency radiation — and essentially function as cell towers. Each installation can have over a thousand antennas that are transmitting simultaneously. Examples of how small cells are not small include:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) estimates and is supporting that millions of these wireless transmitters will be built in our rights-of-way, directly in front of our homes. 4. 5G will add an extra layer — not replace — our current wireless technology. 5G will utilize current 3G and 4G wireless frequencies already in use and also add even more radiation. Higher frequency — submillimeter and millimeter waves — will be used in 5G in order to transmit data at superfast speeds. 5. Community authority is being overruled at every level. Communities are being stripped of their right to make decisions about this new technology. ”Streamlining” means almost automatic approval. Public notice and public hearings are being eliminated. Even if every homeowner on the block opposes the antennas on their street, the opposition will be disregarded with new regulations moving forward at the federal and state level. 6. Cell phone companies have confirmed that 5G “small” cell towers do not need to be placed every hundred feet (despite industry statements that densely placed small cells are needed in close vicinity to homes). Verizon’s CEO, Lowell McAdam stated on camera that 4G and 5G antennas will work from 3,000 feet away on Macro Towers. This statement proves that Verizon DOES NOT need to place 5G small cells in residential areas every 500 to 1,000 feet. “When [Verizon] went out in these 11 [5G test] markets, we tested for well over a year, so we could see every part of foliage and every storm that went through. We have now busted the myth that [5G frequencies] have to be line-of-sight — they do not. We busted the myth that foliage will shut [5G] down . . . that does not happen. And the 200 feet from a home? We are now designing the network for over 2,000 feet from transmitter to receiver, which has a huge impact on our capital need going forward. Those myths have disappeared.” -Lowell McAdam, CEO of Verizon “[Verizon 5G] is really high frequency [28,000 MHz and 39,000 MHz], so everybody thinks it doesn’t go very far, but it’s a really big pipe and so that’s what allows you to gain the super fast speeds . . We’re 3,000 feet away from our radio node. the cool thing about this is that we did not move the radio node. . . here even 3,000 feet away, we’re still getting 1,000 [Megabits per second] speeds . . . So now we’ve driven about 1/3 of a mile away [1,760 feet] from the radio node. we are still getting very good speeds even though we have foliage in between [800 Megabits per second].” -Jason L., Verizon Field Engineer 7. Scientists worldwide are calling for a halt to the 5G Roll-out. Scientists from all over the world have issued a declaration calling for a moratorium on the increase of 5G cell antennas citing human health effects and impacts to wildlife. “We recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry…RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.” — The 5G Scientific Appeal (An Appeal signed by more than 250 scientists and doctors from 35 countries)
“Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being.” – EMF Scientific Appeal The public is unaware that peer reviewed, published science indicates that exposures to wireless radiation can increase cancer risk, alter brain development and damage sperm. This radiation is also associated with headaches, hormone changes, memory problems and sleep problems. Most people are also unaware that wireless technology was never tested for long-term safety decades ago when the technology was first introduced. Children are more vulnerable to this radiation and that the accumulated scientific evidence shows harmful effects. “There is a substantial body of evidence that this technology is harmful to humans and the environment. The 5G millimeter wave is known to heat the eyes, skin and testes… Of particular concern are the most vulnerable among us — the unborn, children, the infirm, the elderly and the disabled. It is also expected that populations of bees and birds will drastically decline.” Letter from oncologist Lennart Hardell MD & Colleagues “A growing body of scientific literature documents evidence of nonthermal cellular damage from non-ionizing wireless radiation used in telecommunications. This RF EMR has been shown to cause an array of adverse effects on DNA integrity, cellular membranes, gene expression, protein synthesis, neuronal function, the blood brain barrier, melatonin production, sperm damage and immune dysfunction”. –Dr. Cindy Russell 2018 paper entitled “5 G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and environmental implications.” Read more published research studies. 9. Scientists state that wireless radiation is a human carcinogen. Several researchers have published their opinion in multiple papers that cellular radiation- radiofrequency radiation (the type that cell towers emit) is a human carcinogen based on the current body of science. In 2018, the US National Toxicology Program study peer review scientists concluded “clear evidence of cancer” from cellular radiation exposure in the largest US animal study ever done on the issue. Examples of this published research includes:
10. Antennas near homes decrease property values. Studies show property values drop up to 20% on homes near cell towers. Would you buy a home with a mini cell tower in the yard? Read research studies that show decreased property value from cell towers near homes. 11. Experts state that 5G Small Cell Wireless streaming bills do not make financial sense. The California Department of Finance rejected California’s 5G small cell wireless infrastructure bill S. 649 stating that, “Finance opposes this bill… this bill goes too far by usurping city and county zoning authority for infrastructure development, and it potentially imposes reimbursable, state-mandated costs on cities and counties.” 12. Microwave antennas in front yards present several worker and public safety issues. Unions have already filed comments that workers were injured, unaware they were working near transmitting antennas. How will HVAC workers, window washers, and tree cutters be protected? The heavy large equipment cabinets mounted on poles along our sidewalks also present new hazards. Cars run into utility poles, often, what then? US Department of Labor letters and reports of cell tower health and safety issues. 13. Fiber is the solution and the safe alternative. Worldwide, many regions are investing in wired fiber optic connections which are are safer, faster, more reliable, provide greater capacity, and are more cyber-secure. Read “Re-Inventing Wires: The Future of Landlines and Networks,” by the National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy 14. Wireless Companies warn investors of risks but neglect to inform consumers and neighbors living near towers. Crown Castle (a company building small cell infrastructure throughout the USA) has a statement in their 2016 10-K Annual Report that says: “If radio frequency emissions from wireless handsets or equipment on our wireless infrastructure are demonstrated to cause negative health effects, potential future claims could adversely affect our operations, costs or revenues… We currently do not maintain any significant insurance with respect to these matters.” Read similar warnings from Crown Castle, Verizon and other wireless companies in their Annual Reports. 15. Antennas near our homes will affect our sleep. Wireless radiation alters sleep patterns in replicated research in both animals and humans. For example, an animal study found an hour of exposure to RFR caused a one-hour delay for rats to drift into REM or deep sleep. Human studies have found exposure reduces REM sleep, alters the EEG signal and results in altered performance. 16. Cellular Radiation Negatively Impacts Birds and Bees Published research finds the frequencies impact wildlife. For example studies have found that the radiation alter bird navigation and disturb honeybee colonies. Research on EMF and Bees. Research on Wildlife 17. US Cities and Entire Countries are voting to halt 5G Petaluma and Mill Valley California have voted on policies to halt 5G. Petaluma City Council voted to prohibited small cell installation on city-owned light poles and other city-owned street furniture and established a 500-foot setback from a small cell to any residence.
18. The FCC is not monitoring radiation exposures from cell installations and many cell towers are in violation of the radiation limits. The Wall Street Journal did an investigative report in 2014 examining over 5,000 cell antennas sites and found that 1 in 10 sites violated the rules during safety audits for carriers and local municipalities “underscoring a safety lapse,” yet the FCC has issued just two citations to cell carriers since 1996 because “the FCC says it lacks resources to monitor each antenna.” A CBS Atlanta investigation also found radiation excesses up to 400 percent of the limit close up to the antennas on rooftop posing serious health risks especially to any worker coming on the roof.
19. The American Academy of Pediatrics is one of many medical organizations that is calling for federal action to protect children. For example, the American Academy of Pediatrics webpage on Cell Towers states: “An Egyptian study confirmed concerns that living nearby mobile phone base stations increased the risk for developing:
“Children are not little adults and are disproportionately impacted by all environmental exposures, including cell phone radiation. Current FCC standards do not account for the unique vulnerability and use patterns specific to pregnant women and children. It is essential that any new standard for cell phones or other wireless devices be based on protecting the youngest and most vulnerable populations to ensure they are safeguarded throughout their lifetimes.” –2013 AAP Letter to the FCC and FDA calling for a review of RF guidelines 8/29/2013 See a list of action and statements by medical organizations here. 20. Firefighters fought hard to oppose 5G small cells in California The International Association of Firefighters has officially opposed cell towers on their stations since 2004 after a study found neurological damage in firefighters with antennas on their station. In 2017, when 5G “small cells were coming to California via a 5G streamlining bill (SB649), firefighter organizations came out in strong opposition to the bill and cited the many peer-reviewed studies. They requested that 5G towers not be installed on firehouses. They were successful and SB649 was amended to exempt their stations from the deployment due to their health concerns. KEY RESEARCH AND REPORTS 5G Frequencies Are Absorbed Into the Skin Physicists found that the higher millimeter frequencies intended for 5G use are preferentially absorbed into the sweat duct at much higher rates than other organ tissues. Read two published studies “The Modeling of the Absorbance of the Sub-THz Radiation by Human Skin.” The human skin as a sub-THz receiver – Does 5G pose a danger to it or not? Paul Ben-Ishai, PhD Lecture. 5G Frequencies Are Used As Weapons Millimeter frequencies – used in 5G applications- have the capacity to cause a severe burning sensation in the skin and are used by the U.S. Department of Defense in crowd control guns called Active Denial Systems. The frequencies are able to cause this burning sensation due to the way the radiation frequencies are absorbed into the sweat gland. Landmark US National Toxicology Program (NTP) Study Finds “Clear Evidence of Cancer” and DNA Damage The NTP studies found male rats exposed for two years to cell phone radiation developed significantly increased gliomas (brain cancer) and schwann cell tumors, the very same types of tumors increased in long-term human cell phone users. NIH/ NTP presentation on DNA results states “exposure to RFR has the potential to induce measurable DNA damage under certain exposure conditions.” Press Coverage, on Peer Review Report Cell Tower Radiation is Linked To Damage in Human Blood A published study compared people living close and far from cell antennas and found people living closer to cellular antennas had changes in blood that predicts cancer development. Read Zothansiama et al, 2017. Read a Compilation of Research on Cell Tower Radiation TAKE ACTION Contact local, state and federal elected officials in person. Share this information with your friends, family and community. Ask for government policy that reduces RFR exposure to the public. Citizens in all states must organize and take action to halt legislation that increases cell antennas in neighborhoods. This EHT fact sheet has links to to scientific resources and key facts from this page. Please download it and send it to your elected officials and community. 5G Fact sheet in Color RESOURCES TO LEARN MORE Link to Federal Legislation You Can Take Action On Link to US States With Streamlining Bills You Can Take Action On CRITICAL LINKS TO INFORMATION ON 5G Whatis5g.info on the human and environmental impact of 5G Physicians for Safe Technology Win19.org Resources on Small Cells and 5G My Street My Choice: Critical information and links to help residents fight 5G Small Cells. KEY RESEARCH AND REPORTS
BioInitiative 2012: A Comprehensive Report by Independent Scientists on the Science of Electromagnetic Radiation Dr. Moskowitz, University of California at Berkeley Dr. Lennart Hardell of Örebro University Sweden The Baby Safe Project: EPA Recognized Awareness Program on Pregnancy and Wireless “This is a unique situation in the history of the human kind when the whole human population will be exposed to man-made devices emitting non-ionizing radiation that was insufficiently tested before deployment. What is and what will be the responsibility of the scientists, decision-makers and industry leaders who permit deployment of insufficiently tested technology that will affect us all? The answer is simple – no responsibility… because if any health problems will show up in the future, these will most likely take tens of years of time to manifest and, by then the persons that currently enable deployment of insufficiently tested radiation-emitting 5G technology will be retired or the proverbial ‘six feet under.’” -Dr. Darius Leszczynski, July 18th, 2018 in Assumption of Safety for 5G by Government Agencies, No Science. Top 20 Facts on 5G: What You Need To Know About 5G Wireless and “Small” Cells
#Stop5G #5G #No5G #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #CellTowers #IoT #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer #NoSmartMeters #NoAMRWaterMeters #LEDLights #SmartMeters #AMRWaterMeters The article from PCMag opining on the problems with 5G is critically important. Why? A major on line publisher PCMag is talking about it helping to make this issue go mainstream and raise awareness. It's good to see that a well known online publication and author express concerns on a technology such as 5G that needs serious consideration for burial and prevented from implementation. This article provides excellent reasons as to why. CY "The technology might be the problem, but even worse for the companies behind it is the perception that 5G is already unsafe before they even get it on a single pole." JCD By John C. Dvorak Original Posting on PC: August 22, 2018 12:21PM EST If you read the barrage of scary literature about 5G mobile phone technology, specifically the use of millimeter wave frequencies to transmit data, you must conclude that it is a bad bet. I'm not saying this because the technology does not work. It's a bad bet because so little is known about the effects of millimeter waves (30GHz-300GHz). While these frequencies only permeate a small fraction of the human epidermis (the skin), the effect on the cornea, in particular, needs serious research. Because the industry is too cheap to study the health effects of the technology itself, it lets this sort of product out the door despite the fact that it has already been weaponized by the military. These frequencies are so poor at travelling long distances, they need a transmitter on nearly every telephone pole and light pole to make 5G work. 5G is already getting some bad publicity, which could result in everything from bans on the technology to equipment destruction by vigilantes. Of course, when you read deeper into what the chip and telecom companies are trying to do, you quickly discover that many systems calling themselves 5G are currently 4G mods using 5G as a marketing tool. Let's ignore that scam and stay focused on millimeter waves. As usual, the mostly arrogant (or naïve) technology industry is caught flat-footed at the negative reaction. It always figures that the stupid public will buy into anything new and jazzy if it makes their handheld phone seem a little faster, and even pay more for the privilege of the upgrade. One of the ways the industry has made this all work in the past is by quick implementation followed by a "Hey look it works! Nobody was killed" approach. That cannot happen with true 5G, which needs all these mini-towers all over the place. That leaves plenty more time for the public to get a clue and be freaked out. When you do a search for "5G is Safe" on Google and Bing, you get a number of negative stories and a laundry list of why some people believe it's unsafe. Companies may as well begin to market a 5G mobile phone with a skull and crossbones on it. If this bad PR is somehow reversed and 5G takes over the market, I will be shocked. The way it is going does not bode well for any of it. John C. Dvorak Columnist, PCMag.com John C. Dvorak is a columnist for PCMag.com and the co-host of the twice weekly podcast, the No Agenda Show (Full biography linked to the name) Source: https://www.pcmag.com/commentary/363244/the-problem-with-5g Excerpts from the comments posted on PCMag for this article provided by smart and obviously critical thinkers. Go directly to the article for more excellent information they provide. "Every piece of independent research (and their are thousands of studies) shows devastating biological harm. There are no studies that indicate no harm (except for a few lame industry studies that cannot be taken seriously given their funding sources). For those who believe the government has standards - they do not. The one standard for microwave exposure is based on heating (thermal) effects and is designed only for workers who may be actually working ON a cell tower. In 1996, the federal government stripped away our rights to reject placement of microwave/ RF emitting devices in the FCC act of 1996 section 704 based on biological, health and environmental concerns. Which is why we’re seeing these towers spring up on school campuses!" CS "As the Harvard School of Ethics' expose "Captured Agency" shows, the FCC has been hijacked by Big Wireless, which makes the tobacco industry look like Mr. Rogers. None of these technologies have been safety tested for long-term exposure, especially to multiple sources with 24/7 exposure." TD "We know there are going to be huge profits for the telecoms and for the government as it sells off these airwaves. (H.R.4953/S.1682 (AIRWAVES)) We know that the Chairman of the FCC is a Verizon connection. And DON’T forget the cost of 5G to the public which includes the network deployment of short-lifespan satellites via suborbital rockets. WHAT’S that going to cost the public? Now, these satellites will not only cost the public BUT will also cause serious atmospheric harm due black carbon emissions which will affect the ozone." CKC Update October 14, 2018 Related Article PC Magazine deletes article about problems with 5G, and fires its author (John C. Dvorak from the No Agenda Show podcast) The Problem With 5G
#Stop5G #5G #No5G #CellTowers #EMFHarms #RFHarms #WiFi #CellTowers #IoT #Health #MicrowaveTechnology #StopTechnocracy #Wireless #Cancer #NoSmartMeters #NoAMRWaterMeters #LEDLights #SmartMeters #AMRWaterMeters |
Archives
September 2020
Categories
All
|